# How many phone cameras is enough?

**URL:** https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share
**Created:** [October 11, 2018, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809 "2018-10-11T15:44:05Z")
**Posts on this page:** 20
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 3:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/1 "2018-10-11T15:44:05Z")

</div>

[Samsung is coming out with a new phone with 4 rear cameras](https://9to5google.com/2018/10/11/sasmung-galaxy-a9-official-four-cameras/amp/). Is this enough? Will it stop there, or will somebody decide that they need more, such as 8 so that you can do everything in 3D?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Lucas\_Jackson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lucas_jackson/32/303_2.png) [@Lucas\_Jackson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lucas_Jackson)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 4:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/2 "2018-10-11T16:35:33Z")

</div>

Not being a Luddite, I could care less how many cameras they put in my phone as long as it does everything else it needs to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Gatopescado](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/gatopescado/32/5711_2.png) [@Gatopescado](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gatopescado)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 4:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/3 "2018-10-11T16:52:28Z")

</div>

4 rear cameras. How very “South Park”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 4:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/4 "2018-10-11T16:55:42Z")

</div>

They’re doing this because a set of 3 separate cameras for wide angle, normal and telephoto is more compact and more reliable (and perhaps cheaper) than one camera with a zoom lens. The 4th camera is for depth-of-field effects, e.g. to blur the background.

I think they should have added a 5th one on the opposite end of the camera, with a wide angle lens, to allow true 3D photos. Honestly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MichaelEmouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/michaelemouse/32/101_2.png) [@MichaelEmouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MichaelEmouse)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 4:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/5 "2018-10-11T16:58:37Z")

</div>

They seem to have included 1 general purpose camera with 3 specialist cameras. However, if you were using those cameras as an array of cameras rather than 4 alternative cameras, what sorts of things could you do?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 5:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/6 "2018-10-11T17:00:20Z")

</div>

p.s. The new [LG V40](https://www.techradar.com/reviews/lg-v40-thinq) phone also has 5 cameras total: 3 rear cameras (normal, wide-angle and telephoto) and 2 front cameras (normal and wide-angle). The wide-angle front camera sounds useful for people who often take group selfies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/7 "2018-10-11T17:06:55Z")

</div>

> [@MichaelEmouse](#):
>
> They seem to have included 1 general purpose camera with 3 specialist cameras. However, if you were using those cameras as an array of cameras rather than 4 alternative cameras, what sorts of things could you do?

The depth-of-field camera is only used to supplement the other 3 cameras. The image processing software uses that information to determine which part of the photo is the foreground, and apply effects - e.g. blur the background.

Combining the telephoto/normal/wide camera data would allow for a wide-angle image with really good detail in the middle of the image.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![MichaelEmouse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/michaelemouse/32/101_2.png) [@MichaelEmouse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MichaelEmouse)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 5:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/8 "2018-10-11T17:17:19Z")

</div>

> [@scr4](#):
>
> The depth-of-field camera is only used to supplement the other 3 cameras. The image processing software uses that information to determine which part of the photo is the foreground, and apply effects - e.g. blur the background.

Thanks. The depth information and processing reminds me of light-field cameras. Any chance to see those being used in any significant way, even outside smartphones?

> [@scr4](#):
>
> Combining the telephoto/normal/wide camera data would allow for a wide-angle image with really good detail in the middle of the image.

So it would replicate the human eye in that way.

Since the cameras are next to each other, would you have a 3D effect?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 6:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/9 "2018-10-11T18:16:34Z")

</div>

> [@scr4](#):
>
> They’re doing this because a set of 3 separate cameras for wide angle, normal and telephoto is more compact and more reliable (and perhaps cheaper) than one camera with a zoom lens. The 4th camera is for depth-of-field effects, e.g. to blur the background.
> 
> I think they should have added a 5th one on the opposite end of the camera, with a wide angle lens, to allow true 3D photos. Honestly.

Just to add a little; they’re all what are called fixed-focal length lenses, which means no moving parts, save the focusing mechanism, if they all even have that.

Your average point and shoot camera has both a zoom lens (variable focal length) and autofocus, but that’s fairly bulky, involves a lot of moving parts, and is usually, but not always faster at any given focal length than the fixed equivalent.

So it makes sense- the DSLR equivalent would be having multiple primes instead of a single zoom.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 6:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/10 "2018-10-11T18:55:57Z")

</div>

> [@scr4](#):
>
> They’re doing this because a set of 3 separate cameras for wide angle, normal and telephoto is more compact and more reliable (and perhaps cheaper) than one camera with a zoom lens.

Yes, I already knew this. But there is still room to add more, such as a 4x telephoto, a 10x telephoto, a fisheye, a macro, an infrared, probably a few more.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Projammer](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/projammer/32/559_2.png) [@Projammer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Projammer)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 7:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/11 "2018-10-11T19:11:10Z")

</div>

Let me know when there’s one for x-ray vision.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/12 "2018-10-11T19:35:59Z")

</div>

> [@Projammer](#):
>
> Let me know when there’s one for x-ray vision.

[You get that with the infrared](https://www.google.com/search?q=sony+infrared+camera+see+through+clothes&oq=sony+infrared+camera+see+through+clothes&gs_l=mobile-heirloom-serp.12...0.0.1.1666.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0....0...1c..34.mobile-heirloom-serp..7.8.2105.g-7H2k7mN9k).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scr4](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/59ef9b/32.png) [@scr4](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/scr4)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/13 "2018-10-11T19:48:17Z")

</div>

> [@Darren\_Garrison](#):
>
> Yes, I already knew this. But there is still room to add more, such as a 4x telephoto, a 10x telephoto, a fisheye, a macro, an infrared, probably a few more.

You mean [like this](https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2018/4/10/17218758/light-l16-review-camera-photos)? (No IR though)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Doctor\_Jackson](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doctor_jackson/32/32_2.png) [@Doctor\_Jackson](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Doctor_Jackson)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 7:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/14 "2018-10-11T19:57:52Z")

</div>

If they would just put a razor blade on each camera one could see in real time how close a shave they were getting…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/15 "2018-10-11T20:37:49Z")

</div>

> [@MichaelEmouse](#):
>
> They seem to have included 1 general purpose camera with 3 specialist cameras. However, if you were using those cameras as an array of cameras rather than 4 alternative cameras, what sorts of things could you do?

There are some phones that do that - in theory, you can use an array of cameras to achieve some of the benefits that you’d get from a larger sensor (which you can’t fit in a slim device) - higher resolution, better light sensitivity, lower noise, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![BeenJammin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beenjammin/32/448_2.png) [@BeenJammin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BeenJammin)
#### Post date: [October 11, 2018, 9:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/16 "2018-10-11T21:42:51Z")

</div>

The only reason these phone makers are coming out with more cameras is because they don’t have the software chops to get the job done with 1 really good camera - like Google and their Pixels. The just-released Pixel3 has arguably the best overall camera experience ever with just 1 lens. They have some really smart people working in that department.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Darren\_Garrison](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/darren_garrison/32/92_2.png) [@Darren\_Garrison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darren_Garrison)
#### Post date: [January 1, 2019, 12:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/17 "2019-01-01T00:38:03Z")

</div>

Take a look at [this](https://www.androidpolice.com/2018/12/31/nokia-9-pureview-and-its-five-rear-cameras-leak-once-again/) sucker.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2019, 5:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/18 "2019-01-02T05:08:50Z")

</div>

> [@BeenJammin](#):
>
> The only reason these phone makers are coming out with more cameras is because they don’t have the software chops to get the job done with 1 really good camera - like Google and their Pixels. The just-released Pixel3 has arguably the best overall camera experience ever with just 1 lens. They have some really smart people working in that department.

Absolutely! Mediocre engineers have always thrown more hardware at problems best solved in software.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Bear\_Nenno](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bear_nenno/32/3358_2.png) [@Bear\_Nenno](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bear_Nenno)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2019, 7:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/19 "2019-01-02T07:13:32Z")

</div>

> [@BeenJammin](#):
>
> The only reason these phone makers are coming out with more cameras is because they don’t have the software chops to get the job done with 1 really good camera - like Google and their Pixels.

That’s not true. That’s like saying a professional photographer needs all those lenses because his camera is inferior to a point and shoot.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![gaffa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e68b1a/32.png) [@gaffa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gaffa)
#### Post date: [January 2, 2019, 1:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809/20 "2019-01-02T13:56:05Z")

</div>

> [@Bear\_Nenno](#):
>
> That’s not true. That’s like saying a professional photographer needs all those lenses because his camera is inferior to a point and shoot.

I take it you have not seen any examples of what Google has accomplished with computational photography. DP Review has done a number of articles on it and they are generally considered the authority on camera phones.

> **[5 ways Google Pixel 3 camera pushes the boundaries of computational photography](https://www.dpreview.com/articles/7921074499/five-ways-google-pixel-3-pushes-the-boundaries-of-computational-photography)**
>
> At a time when manufacturers are adding triple and even quad-cameras to their flagship smartphones, Google is sticking with one main camera. But given the sophistication of the company's computational efforts, we think it's the right approach for...

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-many-phone-cameras-is-enough/822809.md?page=2)
