# How much can a lame duck Congress do?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 5, 2018, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021 "2018-11-05T17:31:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PoppaSan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/poppasan/32/189_2.png) [@PoppaSan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PoppaSan)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2018, 5:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/1 "2018-11-05T17:31:10Z")

</div>

IIRC, the existing Congress meets in session after the election for a few weeks. How much of the Trump agenda can they ram through if the vote switches party dominance in either body? What do the numbers need to be to be veto proof?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PastTense](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pasttense/32/14550_2.png) [@PastTense](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/PastTense)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2018, 6:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/2 "2018-11-05T18:21:31Z")

</div>

They can certainly fill all vacant judicial and executive branch positions which need Senate confirmation. I don’t know where they are in the budget process but these can also be passed.

There may be some urgent legislation with bipartisan support which can be passed.

Other legislation would be held up by Senate filibusters.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jophiel](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jophiel/32/66_2.png) [@Jophiel](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jophiel)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2018, 6:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/3 "2018-11-05T18:27:14Z")

</div>

Note that some agenda items might see a little more push back than they otherwise would. It’s amazing how many people develop a conscience when they know they’re in the final days and party unity doesn’t matter so much any more. So I wouldn’t bet on any last second pushes to repeal the ACA or things like that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RTFirefly](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/c77e96/32.png) [@RTFirefly](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RTFirefly)\
**Post date:** [November 5, 2018, 6:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/4 "2018-11-05T18:32:23Z")

</div>

Legally, a lame-duck Congress is still Congress, and can do anything that Congress can do.

From a political/practical standpoint, who knows? Also, the lame duck period has the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays; Congresscritters who aren’t coming back in January might not be incredibly eager to hang around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dalej42](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/67e7ee/32.png) [@dalej42](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dalej42)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 4:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/5 "2018-11-06T04:11:48Z")

</div>

> [@RTFirefly](#):
>
> Legally, a lame-duck Congress is still Congress, and can do anything that Congress can do.
> 
> From a political/practical standpoint, who knows? Also, the lame duck period has the Thanksgiving and Christmas holidays; Congresscritters who aren’t coming back in January might not be incredibly eager to hang around.

Exactly, even at a lot of companies, a lot of major projects don’t take place between Thanksgiving week and the New Year.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LoneRhino](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lonerhino/32/1311_2.png) [@LoneRhino](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LoneRhino)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 6:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/6 "2018-11-06T06:43:20Z")

</div>

The people that lost the election might feel a little vindictive, but I would imagine that the ones that are retiring from congress want to spend as little time in Washington as possible.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Wesley\_Clark](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wesley_clark/32/20581_2.png) [@Wesley\_Clark](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Wesley_Clark)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 12:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/7 "2018-11-06T12:36:26Z")

</div>

Due to the filibuster, I assume nothing but passing a budget or appointing judges.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![flurb](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/51bf81/32.png) [@flurb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/flurb)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/8 "2018-11-06T14:54:16Z")

</div>

If the current predictions hold (i.e. Dems take the house and Repubs hold the Senate) then I don’t expect a lame duck session to do much of anything. If by some miracle Dems take the Senate majority, McConnel will push through every single judicial nominee currently in the hopper.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 3:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/9 "2018-11-06T15:28:17Z")

</div>

How much has this Congress been able to accomplish even without being lame ducks?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/10 "2018-11-06T15:39:55Z")

</div>

If the republicans lose control of either house I imagine they will be encouraged to do as much damage as possible before the new congress gets seated.

If they maintain control of both houses they’ll relax and not be in any rush.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Whack-a-Mole](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/whack-a-mole/32/141_2.png) [@Whack-a-Mole](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Whack-a-Mole)\
**Post date:** [November 6, 2018, 3:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/11 "2018-11-06T15:42:41Z")

</div>

> [@Wesley\_Clark](#):
>
> Due to the filibuster, I assume nothing but passing a budget or appointing judges.

Can’t McConnell end the filibuster if he wants to?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![EddyTeddyFreddy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/eddyteddyfreddy/32/18796_2.png) [@EddyTeddyFreddy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/EddyTeddyFreddy)\
**Post date:** [November 8, 2018, 3:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/12 "2018-11-08T15:33:05Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> Can’t McConnell end the filibuster if he wants to?

I’m having trouble finding a cite, but my understanding is that the standing rules of the Senate can normally only be changed at the start of a new session.

Edit: Looking further, a rule can be amended with 67 votes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Guest-starring\_Id](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guest-starring_id/32/21736_2.png) [@Guest-starring\_Id](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Guest-starring_Id)\
**Post date:** [November 11, 2018, 5:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/13 "2018-11-11T17:58:24Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> How much has this Congress been able to accomplish even without being lame ducks?

And will be gridlocked into accomplishing even less as President Vilest of Spermbirds will get into some serious locking of horns with Congress now.

> [@LoneRhino](#):
>
> The people that lost the election might feel a little vindictive, but I would imagine that the ones that are retiring from congress want to spend as little time in Washington as possible.

Ryan, Corker, Flake, et al will be very, very fucking glad to rid themselves of the toxicity of Washington. Yes, even Ryan - that spineless, venal, disingenuous milksop of a weasel - will heal his shat-on soul, might even become a genuine person again, no longer under the shadow of President Empty-Headed Animal Food Trough-Wi-_perrrrr_.

\*Cool Belew-inspired username, btw.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [November 12, 2018, 5:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/14 "2018-11-12T05:54:02Z")

</div>

IIRC, state legislatures also often have lame-duck sessions which are sometimes used to reduce the power of an incoming Administration. In Britain, etc. the House of Commons is dissolved before an election. Are there other countries besides U.S.A. where lame-duck sessions are built into the system?

After the passage of the 20th Amendment, lame-duck sessions were the exception. From the end of World War II until the turn of the century the House met in lame-duck only in '48 (just for 1½ hours on 31 December), '50, '70, '74, '80, '82, '94 and (with Senate adjourned) '98. [Cite (pdf).](https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R45154.pdf) Most of those sessions were called for special reasons. The '74 session, for example, was needed because Watergate had used up much of the time needed for legislation. The '80 and '82 sessions were because of needed spending bills.

Although both houses of Congress were switching from D to R after '94, the D’s did not use that lame-duck session mischievously. The extra meeting was solely to pass a new bipartisan GATT bill. The meeting in '98 was called by the R’s to pass an impeachment resolution.

Beginning in 2000, OTOH, _every_ Congress (both House and Senate) has had a lame-duck session. This may have been in part due to the need to pass continuing spending resolutions. The lame-duck 2008 meeting, needed to cope with the financial crisis anyway, also targeted Bush’s use of his own lame-duck powers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hari\_Seldon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hari_seldon/32/5173_2.png) [@Hari\_Seldon](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hari_Seldon)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2018, 1:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/15 "2018-11-16T01:44:06Z")

</div>

I read in the Times that the lame duck session would last only 12 days. The main business will be to pass a continuing budget resolution, which Trump has threatened to veto if it doesn’t include funding for the wall. I don’t know whether the parties can get together enough to override. I can’t see them doing anything substantive in 12 days. And there is no hurry on confirming judges now. Unfortunately.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bump](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7c8e57/32.png) [@bump](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bump)\
**Post date:** [November 16, 2018, 5:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-can-a-lame-duck-congress-do/824021/16 "2018-11-16T17:06:39Z")

</div>

> [@Whack-a-Mole](#):
>
> If the republicans lose control of either house I imagine they will be encouraged to do as much damage as possible before the new congress gets seated.

And here you go…

> **[The GOP Congress should use the lame duck session to take another whack at...](https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/commentary/2018/11/15/the-gop-congress-should-use-the-lame-duck-session-to-take-another-whack-at-obamacare/)**
>
> We've entered the last two months of the 115th Congress, and the last Congress under Republican control for who-knows-how-long. Many Republicans...
