I don’t follow what it is you’re trying to say. To recap:
You said the primary purpose of the show is to titillate with nudity. Everyone else has repeatedly explained to you that the nudity is for deprivation, not titillation.
Here are the wrong things you’ve said in this thread:
The problem with Naked And Afraid is the only reason to watch is the nakedness
Wrong. Primitive Survival is the reason to watch, not nudity. Especially gratifying are some of the bushcraft masterpieces these people engineer.
The nudity can’t be seen, is not the drawcard, and doesn’t affect the competitors.
Wrong. Any tiny amount of modesty clothing would be converted into cordage. In other words, it would be cheating based on the premise of the show.
if the nudity supposedly matters to the contestants, either via modesty or vulnerability, then taking that element away by blurring is, as I said, weird.
“Supposedly” matters? Being naked during cold and rainy nights is very different than being clothed. I mean, you get that, right? Clothes protect you from bugs and cold and (in some cases) rain?
It takes it away from the audience, and the element of the contestants afraid they’d be seen by the audience.
This is such a bizarre train of thought. The vulnerability isn’t “I’m afraid to be seen naked.” The vulnerability is “I hope no gross river critters crawl up my peehole while I’m noodling.” Blurring does nothing to take that vulnerability away.
And if they are covered up by blurs, they may as well be covered up by fig-leaves, for all the difference it makes.
You only think that because you’re fixated on the public’s (your) consumption of that nudity. At no point have you ever thought of the nudity in any context other than titillation. Is there really no such thing as non-sexual nudity in your country?