Agreed with all of this. I don’t actually care, exactly, about my ancestry. I saw a show recently where a man was trying to clear the name of his great-great-uncle who’d been accused of murder and seemed genuinely upset when it turned out that the conviction was likely justified. That’s not how I feel at all. It’s just that I like history, and researching your personal history is an interesting way of learning more. You get to know more about ordinary people; what was interesting to me was how little my family moved (I’ve only really researched my father’s side).
So I genuinely find it interesting that I am literally walking streets that ancestors of mine from 500 years ago walked - I live about 300m from the last known home of my longest-distant named ancestor - people I can put names to, so know it’s not just likely that they walked these streets, but I know it for certain. 500 years of non-movement is not as exotic as being adventurous and travelling across the world, but in a city where everyone assumes there’s a lot of movement in and out, it’s interesting to discover that, for a lot of working class people, that wasn’t true in the slightest.
It does give me a sort of feeling of connection to the place I live. Those big trees, there, that we walk in the shade of, my great-great-great-grandparents walked past when they were saplings.
But if it had turned out that my ancestors had come from all over I’d have liked that too and would have learned more that way as well.