Well, no. I would, however, suspect a study put out by a group whose conclusions fall exactly in line with the goals of that group.
It’s also worth nothing that I can’t get any of their own links to their studies to work.
I always like cites from sites I know who they are. On a medical matter, the AMA is going to be biased, but I have a good guess which way.
Well thanks for looking it over. Yeah without the background information it fails to provide (I couldn’t find it either) it’s just not helpful. No doubt they were very careful and all but we aren’t just going to take their word for it.
If I could squash dissent with data it would not be a topic worthy of debate.