How much is a trillion dollars?

Here’s your mistake. If it worked like this, you’d be right, there would be no effective creation of money.

However, if I borrow $9,000 from bank A, and then I buy something from X, where are we?

I have $9000 worth of stuff, and I owe the bank $9,000.

X has $ 9,000 dollars that he didn’t need to borrow to get. (say, he’s a painter, and sold a painting made with stuff X had on hand).

So now, you have $10,000. It’s in the bank-you have an IOU worth 10k. +10k
Bank A has $2,000 cash, and an IOU worth 8k that I gave it. It also owes you 10k. Net worth=0

I have a painting, worth 9k. I also owe the bank 9k. Net worth, =0

But X has $9,000 and doesn’t owe anyone anything. Now we’ve created money.

X now goes to his bank, deposits the 9,000, and the cycle begins again.

$10,000 in “high-powered money”. Let’s simplify by imagining this to be cash. Absent some counterfeiter, there’s always going to be $10,000 of cash in the economy. As I show above, that doesn’t prove that there is $10,000 in money in the economy

And this is why the FDIC now guarantees bank accounts up to (I think), 100,000. Lots more money than I have, anyway. So if a bank can’t pay, the money isn’t lost-it’s insured. Not like the great depression, where when a bank couldn’t pay, the money went poof.

Also, reserve requirements reduce this risk–a bank with 10 billion in deposits is pretty sure that it won’t have $10 billion of withdrawals. It might have 50 million, though. So it might want to keep only 50 million in cash on hand.

A 10% deposit requirement makes the bank keep $1 billion on hand. The point is to set this level far higher than the average cash need-so that it’s very very unlikely that the demand for withdrawals will be greater than the cash-on-hand.

Sorry, in my rush to post a response I neglected to stop and think through the fractional reserve money creation process and shortcut straight to the end result.

There’s a pile of real world cash I have in my hand = $10,000

I deposit that $10,000 in Bank A

Bank A keeps $2,000 in reserve and happily lends Person B $8,000

Person B deposits their new $8,000 in Bank B (there are now $18,000 sitting in bank accounts)

Bank B keeps $1,600 of Person B’s money and lends out $6,400 to Person C.

Person C deposits their new $6,400 in Bank C (there are now $24,400 sitting in bank accounts)

etc. etc

See what I mean about creating money?

Yes, but it’s an inevitable result of the system-not of any individual actor. No one entity can “print” money-no bank can lend more than the deposits it has.

OK, I think I got it now, thanks for the patient explanation.