# How much money does Buffet's secretary make?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 2, 2012, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578 "2012-02-02T21:10:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 9:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/1 "2012-02-02T21:10:01Z")

</div>

According to [the press in recent months,](http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/business/2012/01/warren-buffett-and-his-secretary-talk-taxes/) Warren Buffet’s secretary pays 35.6% of her income in taxes. Presumably this includes both federal and state taxes, since the highest marginal federal income tax rate is 35%.

So how much money is she actually earning? I’m guessing it’s around $1M per year taxable; that would result in a federal tax rate of 32.4%, leaving some room for state taxes.

Can anyone confirm that her income is in that ballpark?

If so, that’s quite a handsome salary for a “secretary;” I would assume that for this kind of money, her duties are more like that of an executive assistant or personal valet. Anyone seen her detailed job description?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gazpacho](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6f9a4e/32.png) [@gazpacho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gazpacho)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 9:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/2 "2012-02-02T21:13:59Z")

</div>

You are leaving out payroll taxes. Which I do not know if people include or not in these calculations. Which are either about 7.5% or 15% depending if you believe that the employers contribution is part of what people get paid.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dewey\_Finn](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dewey_finn/32/4222_2.png) [@Dewey\_Finn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dewey_Finn)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/3 "2012-02-02T21:16:31Z")

</div>

[This article](http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2012/01/25/warren-buffetts-secretary-likely-makes-between-200000-and-500000year/) from Forbes suggests between $200,000 and $500,000.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![anson2995](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/c77e96/32.png) [@anson2995](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/anson2995)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/4 "2012-02-02T21:51:00Z")

</div>

Some of the folks in the press have made wild guesses based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what was actually said. The secretary, Debbie Bosanek, is not paying a federal tax rate of 35.6%. [Per the Omaha World-Herald](http://www.omaha.com/article/20120127/NEWS01/301279949/672):

> [@](#):
>
> That rate is for everything Bosanek pays to the federal government — income taxes as well as payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare.

The article also says that while both she and Buffet have declined to reveal her salary, Buffett told the Times of London a few years ago that she makes around $60,000.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![obbn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/d6d6ee/32.png) [@obbn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/obbn)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/5 "2012-02-02T21:59:57Z")

</div>

> [@Dewey\_Finn](#):
>
> [This article](http://www.forbes.com/sites/paulroderickgregory/2012/01/25/warren-buffetts-secretary-likely-makes-between-200000-and-500000year/) from Forbes suggests between $200,000 and $500,000.

Oh, that is hilarious. All this time the press has made it seem that she was an ordinary secretary making around 30k a year. So, the whole “outrage” is misplaced by a distortion of the facts. She IS a secretary, but she is a HIGHLY paid secretary. Why the outrage then, she makes a shit ton of money? No, not as much a Buffet of course, but a ton. Also, as expressed so many times before, most of Buffet’s taxable liability is from capital gains and not earned income. Big difference in tax rates between the two forms of income.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 10:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/6 "2012-02-02T22:03:51Z")

</div>

> [@obbn](#):
>
> Oh, that is hilarious. All this time the press has made it seem that she was an ordinary secretary making around 30k a year. So, the whole “outrage” is misplaced by a distortion of the facts. She IS a secretary, but she is a HIGHLY paid secretary. Why the outrage then, she makes a shit ton of money? No, not as much a Buffet of course, but a ton.\*\* Also, as expressed so many times before, most of Buffet’s taxable liability is from capital gains and not earned income. Big difference in tax rates between the two forms of income.\*\*

(Bolding mine)

Uhhh…that’s the whole point.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![obbn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/o/d6d6ee/32.png) [@obbn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/obbn)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 11:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/7 "2012-02-02T23:26:41Z")

</div>

> [@beowulff](#):
>
> (Bolding mine)
> 
> Uhhh…that’s the whole point.

If the whole point is that we must stop the rich people from _gasp_ making money from capital gains, I will ask if we should also stop the same thing from happening to the middle class as well? Plenty of middle class people increase their net worth by investing in stocks, precious medals and the like. Should we go ahead and punish them as well by taking away the lower tax rate on capital gains?

I am certainly not rich, but I am not jealous enough of those who are to want to tax them into oblivion. They are rich for the most part because they did the things that I didn’t do to get rich. Be it have the brains, the drive or the skill or even the luck. But I really don’t get this whole punish the rich for being rich thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 11:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/8 "2012-02-02T23:36:26Z")

</div>

> [@obbn](#):
>
> I am certainly not rich, but I am not jealous enough of those who are to want to tax them into oblivion. They are rich for the most part because they did the things that I didn’t do to get rich.

The current capital gains tax rate of 15% (for higher incomes and ignoring the short term tax rate) is the lowest it’s been since just after WWII.

It’s perfectly reasonable to argue that returning to Clinton (varied between 21 and 29%), Bush41 (~28-29%), or Reagan (~20-28%) levels of taxation on capital gains will not tax the rich into oblivion.

The idea is that an increase in capital gains to previously levels (even to 20 or 25%) did not tax the past rich into oblivion and let them pay federal taxes more in line with the rest of us. How is getting them to pay closer to the share of taxes paid (by percentage of income) by the rest of us the same as taxing them into oblivion?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Duckster](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/duckster/32/1244_2.png) [@Duckster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Duckster)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2012, 11:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/9 "2012-02-02T23:44:44Z")

</div>

> [@obbn](#):
>
> If the whole point is that we must stop the rich people from _gasp_ making money from capital gains, I will ask if we should also stop the same thing from happening to the middle class as well? Plenty of middle class people increase their net worth by investing in stocks, precious medals and the like. Should we go ahead and punish them as well by taking away the lower tax rate on capital gains?

I think you are missing the point. The disposable net income of “ordinary” people does not really allow them to build up a sizable nest egg, let alone use $100 bills to light cigars. The “rich” take advantage of their income in capital gains where their disposable net income allows for accumulating considerable wealth. The tax rates on these folks are different, skewed to the benefit of the wealthy.

In other words, the price of a loaf of bread, a gallon of milk, a pound of hamburger and a dozen eggs might be the same for both individuals. However, one has to choose which _one_ to buy this week while the other can buy the entire weekly production, every week, of all the items, and their wealth continues to go up. Yes, I’m painting with a wide brush. And yes, life isn’t fair so deal with it. The perception is (and perception is reality) an overt sense of inequity and unfairness.

In this scenario, for the sake of the argument, equity would be an identical tax rate, regardless of how that income is earned, i.e., a flat tax. Then there is the possibility of an additional tax on the wealthy because, yes, they can afford it. And yes, you can argue all that until the cows come home as well. But when so many middle class are out of work, with no money, their reality can bring even the wealthy down (however you want to define that term). Yeah, I just saw _Soylent Green_ again.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 1:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/10 "2012-02-03T01:00:32Z")

</div>

Not much, but she gets all the tequila she can drink, and a stipend for Hawaiian shirts.

Ohhh… **Warren** Buffett’s secretary. Never mind. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dracoi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/90db22/32.png) [@dracoi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dracoi)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 1:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/11 "2012-02-03T01:43:33Z")

</div>

> [@Duckster](#):
>
> I think you are missing the point. The disposable net income of “ordinary” people does not really allow them to build up a sizable nest egg, let alone use $100 bills to light cigars. The “rich” take advantage of their income in capital gains where their disposable net income allows for accumulating considerable wealth. The tax rates on these folks are different, skewed to the benefit of the wealthy.

We may be rapidly departing GQ territory, so don’t take the following statements as opinion or argument, simply as a summary of the reasoning that went into the laws we have now.

The idea is that the rich DON’T light their cigars with $100 bills. To a large extent, they start companies, and these companies not only hire wage-earners, but they pay taxes themselves. So if Buffett invests $10 billion in Company X and Company X increases in value to $20 billion, there has - in theory, at least - already been $3.5 billion in tax paid (35% of the $10 billion that presumably came from profit). Had the company not paid those taxes, Buffet’s value would have been 23.5 billion. So if Buffet pays another 1.5 billion (15%), we’re really just taxing the same money a second time.

So… while the rich investor is paying a lower rate when we look at only the individual entity, the lower rate is paid on investments that produce jobs and pay taxes themselves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 1:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/12 "2012-02-03T01:51:50Z")

</div>

There doesn’t seem to be a real GQ type answer to the OPs question, since neither Buffet nor his secretary seem to be publishing her exact salary, at least from what I can tell. And since I’ve seen no details on exactly what taxes Buffet was including (or not including) in her rate, I don’t thing a lot can be determined from that either.

The fact remains that Buffet doesn’t pay as much of a percentage as she does because he has no salary, and thus pays no income tax, while she does and so she does. He also has owns a business, so he has more write offs than she does, since she works for him. He also makes huge charitable contributions that he can use to defray even more of his taxes, something that even if she makes a million a year she couldn’t match. You can parse that any way you like, depending on your political orientation, but anything more along these lines should be in GD, since there doesn’t seem to be a factual GQ answer to the question.

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 1:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/13 "2012-02-03T01:52:42Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> We may be rapidly departing GQ territory, so don’t take the following statements as opinion or argument, simply as a summary of the reasoning that went into the laws we have now.
> 
> The idea is that the rich DON’T light their cigars with $100 bills. To a large extent, they start companies, and these companies not only hire wage-earners, but they pay taxes themselves. So if Buffett invests $10 billion in Company X and Company X increases in value to $20 billion, there has - in theory, at least - already been $3.5 billion in tax paid (35% of the $10 billion that presumably came from profit). Had the company not paid those taxes, Buffet’s value would have been 23.5 billion. So if Buffet pays another 1.5 billion (15%), we’re really just taxing the same money a second time.
> 
> So… while the rich investor is paying a lower rate when we look at only the individual entity, the lower rate is paid on investments that produce jobs and pay taxes themselves.

You can’t be serious.  
When Facebook goes public, a lot of early investors are going to make a lot of money, and **none** of that will have come from income that had taxes paid on it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dracoi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/90db22/32.png) [@dracoi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dracoi)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 2:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/14 "2012-02-03T02:02:28Z")

</div>

> [@beowulff](#):
>
> You can’t be serious.  
> When Facebook goes public, a lot of early investors are going to make a lot of money, and **none** of that will have come from income that had taxes paid on it.

Are you asserting that Facebook employs no Americans, and pays no income taxes on profits?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 2:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/15 "2012-02-03T02:08:25Z")

</div>

Since it seems like the available factual information was provided in the first few posts, and further discussion is best suited to GD, let’s move this over there.

Colibri  
General Questions Moderator

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![beowulff](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/beowulff/32/542_2.png) [@beowulff](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/beowulff)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/16 "2012-02-03T02:09:23Z")

</div>

> [@dracoi](#):
>
> Are you asserting that Facebook employs no Americans, and pays no income taxes on profits?

Read my post more carefully.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Happy\_Fun\_Ball](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/happy_fun_ball/32/17664_2.png) [@Happy\_Fun\_Ball](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Happy_Fun_Ball)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 4:50am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/17 "2012-02-03T04:50:19Z")

</div>

> [@obbn](#):
>
> \<snip\> but I am not jealous enough of those who are to want to tax them into oblivion.

Tax them into oblivion? Who the fuck is wanting them to be taxed into oblivion? Talk about a straw man.

Personally I would think it was a-OK if they paid the same 30 odd% rate that I pay on the money I make. I could even be talked into a flat tax given certain requirements, but I still feel it is bullshit that people who live off of capital gains and dividends pay lees than half the rate that I do. And that includes members of my own family. It has nothing to do with jelousy, it has to do with fairness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![XT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/xt/32/456_2.png) [@XT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/XT)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/18 "2012-02-03T04:52:46Z")

</div>

What is this ‘fairness’ thing, and how do you quantify it?

-XT

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Great\_Antibob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/e47c2d/32.png) [@Great\_Antibob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Great_Antibob)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 5:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/19 "2012-02-03T05:01:51Z")

</div>

> [@xtisme](#):
>
> What is this ‘fairness’ thing, and how do you quantify it?

A subjective quantity and quantified subjectively (and individually, to boot). No surprise there’s a debate, then, about what constitutes fair.

Aside: I’ve also tried to explain that “fairness” is subjective to a few flat taxers to no avail. Apparently (according to these individuals, anyway), there actually is an objective notion of fairness, and it can be applied to tax policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![septimus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/septimus/32/410_2.png) [@septimus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/septimus)\
**Post date:** [February 3, 2012, 5:32am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578/21 "2012-02-03T05:32:28Z")

</div>

> [@L. G. Butts](#):
>
> Tax them into oblivion? Who the fuck is wanting them to be taxed into oblivion? Talk about a straw man.

Forget it, Jake. It’s Hyperbole-Town.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-money-does-buffets-secretary-make/611578.md?page=2)
