# How much would one cup of protons weigh?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [September 30, 2009, 6:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133 "2009-09-30T18:00:25Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 15\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 5:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/21 "2009-10-01T05:51:32Z")

</div>

In any situation where the electromagnetic force is present, it’ll always dominate over the weak force, until you get up into energies of nearly a hundred GeV. The strong force will eventually become repulsive and overcome the electromagnetic force, but we don’t know the details of precisely how the strong force works.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flymaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c4cdca/32.png) [@Flymaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flymaster)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 12:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/22 "2009-10-01T12:04:38Z")

</div>

> [@Darwins\_Finch](#):
>
> Setting aside issues such as charge and significant figures:
> 
> The volume of a proton is 1.5x10[sup]-41[/sup] m[sup]3[/sup]  
> 1 cup is 0.000236588237 m[sup]3[/sup]
> 
> Thus, 1.577254913x10[sup]37[/sup] protons will fit in one cup.
> 
> Each proton weighs 1.676621637x10[sup]-27[/sup] kg, so the total mass of all those protons would be 26,381,506,951 kg. Since there are 2.2 lbs / kg, then, 1 cup of protons would weigh about 58 billion pounds.

“Fit in one cup”? No. You’re presumably packing spheres here, so you’re looking at a best-case density of .75

The answer you’ve given is the number of protons that will take up the space of one cup. But you couldn’t fit that many INTO a cup.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ludovic](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ab992/32.png) [@Ludovic](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ludovic)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/23 "2009-10-01T13:28:28Z")

</div>

> [@Grey](#):
>
> Which of course adds a twist. If I only put 2 protons in a “cup” then the weight will be small. If I close pack them then it’s quite large. We may need a clarification. 🙂

2 protons, one cup.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inigo\_Montoya](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inigo_montoya/32/124_2.png) [@Inigo\_Montoya](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inigo_Montoya)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 1:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/24 "2009-10-01T13:52:07Z")

</div>

> [@Ludovic](#):
>
> 2 protons, one cup.

_snerk_

Thanks for the answers. I guess I hadn’t really thought about the logistics of getting that many protons to stay that close together. Would this thought experiment be any easier if we used neutrons?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Quercus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/7ab992/32.png) [@Quercus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Quercus)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 1:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/25 "2009-10-01T13:57:15Z")

</div>

> [@ivn1188](#):
>
> Protons sans electron would be a lot more dense than a hydrogen atom, thus for the same volume, the weight would be much much greater.

Actually – for any given ambient pressure – protons sans electrons will be less dense, as they’ll repel each other. Electrons will soak up the charge and allow closer packing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pan1](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e495f1/32.png) [@pan1](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pan1)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 2:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/26 "2009-10-01T14:17:00Z")

</div>

> [@Snarky\_Kong](#):
>
> Mostly because they’re not elements at that density.

yeah, the protons would all “burn” away leaving nothing but a cup of Neutrons - hence the term “Neutron Star”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 2:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/27 "2009-10-01T14:30:03Z")

</div>

See, this is why they sell protons by weight, not by volume. Settling or expansion of contents may occur during shipping.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ivn1188](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e480ec/32.png) [@ivn1188](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ivn1188)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 6:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/28 "2009-10-01T18:19:45Z")

</div>

> [@Quercus](#):
>
> Actually – for any given ambient pressure – protons sans electrons will be less dense, as they’ll repel each other. Electrons will soak up the charge and allow closer packing.

At this point, have we not established that this is a thought experiment, and that there are many many real world constraints that would prevent anyone from filling up a cup with protons?

The intent of the OP is pretty clear, and calling it impossible to do is true, but valueless. This question as posed is akin to “What would happen if you cut a hole through the earth and jumped down” or “What if you turned your headlights on when you were going at c” – both impossible experiements but conceptually useful. If the OP wants to clarify his question to ask something like the maximum density of proton matter achievable, then you can remind everyone that like charges repel.

The answer to the question posed is “an immense amount”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/29 "2009-10-01T19:13:50Z")

</div>

Answering the question requires filling in all sorts of unknown assumptions. The simplest assumption is the weight of one cup of hydrogen gas. You’d assume that would be a sea level temperature and pressure, I suppose. The weight of the electrons would be trivial. But then we find an interesting thing, when we put the protons (+ a tiny weight of electrons) on a scale to see how much they weigh, they float away. Negative weight! So should we change the question to, “How much do they mass?”

We can’t just say, “this is a thought experiment”, because there’s no answer to the question without making about 30 assumptions not given in the question. It’s like asking, “How long is a piece of string?”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gazpacho](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6f9a4e/32.png) [@gazpacho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gazpacho)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 7:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/30 "2009-10-01T19:40:41Z")

</div>

Unless otherwise specified the conditions are standard temperature and pressure. Basically sea level pressure and room temperature. The same assumptions you would make for any other liquid or gas. So a cup of protons would not weigh very much because to confine a lot of them will require a large pressure due to the fact that they repel each other.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/31 "2009-10-01T20:07:24Z")

</div>

> [@Darwins\_Finch](#):
>
> Setting aside issues such as charge and significant figures:
> 
> The volume of a proton is 1.5x10[sup]-41[/sup] m[sup]3[/sup]  
> 1 cup is 0.000236588237 m[sup]3[/sup]
> 
> Thus, 1.577254913x10[sup]37[/sup] protons will fit in one cup.
> 
> Each proton weighs 1.676621637x10[sup]-27[/sup] kg, so the total mass of all those protons would be 26,381,506,951 kg. Since there are 2.2 lbs / kg, then, 1 cup of protons would weigh about 58 billion pounds.

This, along with **Flymaster’s** correction, seems to me to be best answer. When someone asks ‘what would a cup of X weigh’? I would assume that they mean if it were all packed in tight.

The other answers seem to suffer from an over-abundance of cleverness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/32 "2009-10-01T20:21:14Z")

</div>

But if someone asks, “What would a cup of lead weigh?” or “What would a cup of yogurt weigh?”, we can make pretty good assumptions about what it means to be “packed in tight”. Even for “a cup of air”, we could imagine sea level pressure and room temperature.

But a cup of protons can’t be “packed in tight” under sea level pressure and room temperature. To get an answer for protons “packed in tight”, we’d have to increase the pressure to a point where we’re not talking about ordinary matter. Or we could be talking about a cup full of very thin ionized hydrogen gas.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![billfish678](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7bcc69/32.png) [@billfish678](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/billfish678)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 8:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/33 "2009-10-01T20:27:00Z")

</div>

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> See, this is why they sell protons by weight, not by volume. Settling or expansion of contents may occur during shipping.

And if the shipping is really slow there may be some spoilage 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gazpacho](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6f9a4e/32.png) [@gazpacho](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gazpacho)\
**Post date:** [October 1, 2009, 9:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/34 "2009-10-01T21:52:39Z")

</div>

> [@billfish678](#):
>
> And if the shipping is really slow there may be some spoilage 🙂

Has science determined the shelf life of protons yet? I seem to remember big experiments trying to determine the half life of protons. A few years ago they had not yet seen a proton decay.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Corner\_Case](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/corner_case/32/234_2.png) [@Corner\_Case](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Corner_Case)\
**Post date:** [October 5, 2009, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133/35 "2009-10-05T21:35:13Z")

</div>

> [@Lemur866](#):
>
> It’s like asking, “How long is a piece of string?”

The string-length is approximately the Planck length, but can be significantly bigger when the strings are weakly interacting. The plank length varies - a standard 2x4 comes in many different lengths.

A [proton](http://www.proton.co.uk/), on the other hand, would not fit in the other hand; nor in a cup. However they do have cup _holders_.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-much-would-one-cup-of-protons-weigh/512133.md?page=1)
