How to be hideous: the right wing tries to discredit the Parkland school shooting survivors

Yup, the NRA uses irrational fear to sell its product and the main fear it pushes is fear of the black man coming for your women.

You’re lumping together the guns - almost exclusively handguns - used in street crime, with the semi-auto versions of combat weapons used for mass slaughters. The latter aren’t used by the ‘criminal element,’ nor are they much good for protection against that element. The focus of the current set of gun control-related threads is, for obvious reasons, all about stopping the massacres, and the solutions being proposed are pretty much completely disconnected from issues concerning the ‘criminal element’ and protecting oneself from it.

Well, there’s this thing called democracy. If “the country’s liberals” pass legislation creating some program to address a particular issue, after awhile public sentiment will either say (a) “that’s fucked - repeal it” or (b) “that’s great the way it is, leave it like it is,” or (c) “that’s a step in the right direction, but more needs to be done.”

If (c), then we do more, and it sucks to be you. If (a) or (b), then you have nothing to worry about, given how scared Dem politicians are of going up against public opposition.

QFT

How about this compromise on the issue of school shootings: We arm teachers, but only the black ones. Both sides get something they want, right?

If they’re boasting about their guns on Facebook, it’s hard to take their fears seriously about the Evil Government busting in and taking their guns.

If one assumed a government with an inclination to do that, talking about one’s guns on social media wouldn’t be quite as useful to the government as universal gun registration would be, but it would be close.

In John Oliver’s brilliant “Daily Show” three-part story on gun control, he makes the point that, until we have zero drugs on the street, there’s really no need to enforce those pesky drug laws, either.

I see this as analogous to **Starving Artist **'s thoughts on guns.

What, and abandon your long-established pattern of blaming everything on 1960s counterculture?
It’d be a significant improvement.

I really don’t understand this line of thinking. I mean, I get it: you dislike liberals and are afraid that they’ll take your guns, increase crime, and whatever other bogeymen your fevered imagination has created. But why oppose reasonable gun control legislation based solely on a blatantly obvious slippery slope fallacy?

I won’t even bother trying to argue with your … troubling … view of liberals or ask for cites for your assertions or point out that reality doesn’t fit with your fixed views. Rather, I’m trying to understand why, if I were in your head and agreed with you, you would reject needed changes to legislation to help save lives, decrease gun violence, and keep certain weapons out of the hands of bad people and instead embrace a logical fallacy.

You’ve heard of white knights coming to the defence of the fairer sex, yes? That there is a cardboard knight coming to the defence of conservatives.

More like

“I was always this much of a scumbag, but I wanna blame you because I don’t have the balls to admit I was always this way”

This one speaks the absolute truth.

By now, of course, we all are all too aware of the right-wing obsession with the Parkland kids. Here’s a piece that summarizes the number and type of pieces about them on various right-wing sites.

To the cornfield with you.

Me too.

That would be great!

As with the presidency of Donald Trump, you have only your own behavior to blame. Not of course that you’ll ever admit, or even be capable of recognizing, that. Assholism breeds assholism. Maybe one day you guys will figure that out.

Thank you for the demonstration on how to be hideous. As a bonus, you are also demonstrating how to be fucking stupid.

Case in point.

Very self referential of you.

Just to be clear, you are saying that because you and your friends wanted to piss off liberals that you have disgust and contempt for, and that do things that you hate, you elected trump, and then blamed it on the people who didn’t vote for trump?

We get that the “guns don’t shoot themselves” (although given the almost straight line correlation between the number of guns and the number of gun deaths/injuries, they might as well), but no crazy person ever injured or killed someone by waving their pointed finger around going “Bang, Bang” either. This isn’t a gun or crazy person problem. It’s a gun and crazy person problem and unless action is taken on both sides of the equation, it will continue.

You can arm every teacher, counselor, coach, principal and lunch lady, and the shooters will relocate to the movie theater, the mall, McDonald’s, the concert, the church, or the nightclub. (All of which have been venues for mass shootings in the past.) Then what? Arm the cashiers? The ushers? And how long before all those additional guns in all those untrained hands become a problem? Pretty darned quickly, I’m guessing.