# How well mixed is CO2?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 18, 2021, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192 "2021-03-18T16:25:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 4:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/1 "2021-03-18T16:25:16Z")

</div>

The other day, a friend brought over an air-quality monitor. It measured a number of different gases and particulates, but the one that caught my eye, since I have a sense of what it should have read, was the CO2 meter. Here’s the setup:

- Current global average CO2 concentration is 417.25 ppm.
- The CO2 meter in question was reading - bouncing around - between 520 and 560
- It was outside
- In the evening, about 9:00 pm local time
- In a city, but a residential part. Our house is on a ~5000 sq ft lot, and on a non-busy street
- It was not particularly near any CO2 sources, other than four humans with open glasses of beer.

My question, in a nutshell, is: is the meter bad, or is something in the 500s actually a reasonable read for this scenario? Curious if anyone knows authoritatively, but also anecdotes about other local outdoors CO2 measurements are welcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 4:45pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/2 "2021-03-18T16:45:33Z")

</div>

Do you live in a dip? Also, how cold was it, and what was the air pressure?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/3 "2021-03-18T16:49:06Z")

</div>

I don’t live in a dip. The block itself is pretty flat, but if you look over a 30 block range, it does have a bit of a continuous slope. It was probably low 40s (F) and dropping (we ended up calling the evening a bit early because everyone was cold), but I didn’t measure the air pressure.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 5:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/4 "2021-03-18T17:16:09Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Do you live in a dip? Also, how cold was it, and what was the air pressure?

I don’t think gravity is going to matter unless your CO2 concentration is high enough to meaningfully increase the density of the air parcel in question. Air with 540 ppm of CO2 is going to have almost exactly the same density as air with 417 ppm.

CO2 is a product of carbon and hydrocarbon combustion (not to mention respiration). If you live near an urban/suburban area, then human activities can cause an increase in local CO2 levels. After a brief web search, I found **[this paper](https://www.pnas.org/content/115/12/2912)** which included **[this figure](https://www.pnas.org/content/pnas/115/12/2912/F1.large.jpg)**, showing CO2 levels at several measuring locations around Salt Lake City. The meter west of the city shows something close to the global average (low 400s), but the ones in the city or east of it were reaching up into the 600s and even 700s.

So…never mind the dip, where were you? You mentioned a block, so I’m guessing suburbs? Anywhere near a major roadway, with prevailing winds coming your way?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 5:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/5 "2021-03-18T17:26:20Z")

</div>

> [@Machine\_Elf](#):
>
> So…never mind the dip, where were you? You mentioned a block, so I’m guessing suburbs? Anywhere near a major roadway, with prevailing winds coming your way?

As I mentioned in the OP, I’m in a city (Seattle), though a residential part of it. Not on a major road, but I’m not in the suburbs either. I’ll take a look at that paper. That sounds like the kind of data I’m curious about!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 5:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/6 "2021-03-18T17:27:42Z")

</div>

> [@Machine\_Elf](#):
>
> I don’t think gravity is going to matter unless your CO2 concentration is high enough to meaningfully increase the density of the air parcel in question.

Air’s a mixture, and within that mixture, CO2 flows preferentially downhill vs other components. That’s why when you measure CO2 in forest ecology, you also check the advection rates.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 6:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/7 "2021-03-18T18:18:05Z")

</div>

The only CO2-meter I have used required calibration to the outside air (and presumed outside air would have CO2 at 400ppm, so that is good design). Was this meter factory calibrated or did it require intermittent re-calibration? What kind of accuracy in the 400-500ppm range was it supposed to have?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 6:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/8 "2021-03-18T18:22:22Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Air’s a mixture, and within that mixture, CO2 flows preferentially downhill vs other components.

I don’t think that’s true.

> [@how strong is the tendency for stratification in gas mixtures?](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-strong-is-the-tendency-for-stratification-in-gas-mixtures/788932):
>
> The atmosphere is composed primarily of oxygen and nitrogen. These gases have different molar weights; molecular diffusion and bulk convection endeavor to keep them homogenously mixed, but gravity, working on their different molar weights, endeavors to stratify them, with the heavier molecules at the bottom of the pile. So how strong is the tendency toward stratification? If I eliminate bulk convection by enclosing a quiescent volume of air in a room-sized chamber with all surfaces at one con…

> [@naita](#):
>
> (and presumed outside air would have CO2 at 400ppm, so that is good design).

The paper I cited upthread suggests that local concentrations may vary significantly from the global average of ~409 ppm.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 6:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/9 "2021-03-18T18:24:35Z")

</div>

> [@naita](#):
>
> (and presumed outside air would have CO2 at 400ppm, so that is good design)

> [@Machine\_Elf](#):
>
> The paper I cited upthread suggests that local concentrations may vary significantly from the global average of ~409 ppm.

I forgot to include a sarcasm tag. 🙂 It was perfectly fine for showing the relative changes in CO2 in a closed chamber with a plant through a day-night-cycle, but I wouldn’t have accepted students writing a paper on local CO2-levels based on the measurements.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wolfpup](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wolfpup/32/10618_2.png) [@wolfpup](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wolfpup)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 7:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/10 "2021-03-18T19:05:37Z")

</div>

A couple of things.

In climate papers, CO2 is specifically characterized as a well mixed greenhouse gas (sometimes denoted as WMGHG). But this refers to its homogeneity on a global scale, implying that the direct CO2 forcing on climate is the same everywhere (not that global warming is the same everywhere, which it absolutely is not). The reason it’s considered to be well mixed is that its residency time in the atmosphere is very long; a rule of thumb is that, on average, it’s more than 100 years.

As for regional variations, I don’t really know. You’re obviously going to get higher readings closer to major CO2 emission sources. But note that although the CO2 relative concentration (PPM) doesn’t change much with altitude, when a CO2 meter measures CO2 as an absolute quantity, **[it has to be calibrated at a specific altitude](https://www.co2meter.com/blogs/news/127454855-altitude-compensation-for-co2-sensor-modules)**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/11 "2021-03-18T19:59:26Z")

</div>

> [@Machine\_Elf](#):
>
> I don’t think that’s true.

Nobody, least of all me, is suggesting stratification. Just that, if there were a source of CO2 somewhere (you know, the thing you’re suggesting), that denser gas would flow downhill before complete mixture occurred. That CO2 is denser than air as a whole is not controversial.

Yes, no dip is needed for elevated CO2 in the city. I agree completely. I was just suggesting possible reasons for local higher levels. The “how cold”, for instance, would speak to things like fires and heaters. And topography is definitely something to consider when taking CO2 measurements. That’s what I was taught at uni, anyway.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 8:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/12 "2021-03-18T20:10:02Z")

</div>

> [@naita](#):
>
> Was this meter factory calibrated or did it require intermittent re-calibration?

I’m honestly not sure. It’s not my device, and I don’t have it in my possession now, but it certainly didn’t look like a serious scientific instrument. To my knowledge, it had no mechanism to calibrate it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/13 "2021-03-18T20:34:10Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Nobody, least of all me, is suggesting stratification. Just that, if there were a source of CO2 somewhere (you know, the thing you’re suggesting), that denser gas would flow downhill before complete mixture occurred.

Yes, it would. And it would also flow uphill and lefthill and righthill. It flowing in every direction is how the mixing happens. Gases can flow through each other, so the fact that carbon dioxide is denser than air is irrelevant.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 9:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/14 "2021-03-18T21:18:00Z")

</div>

[Invisible CO2 Gas Killing Trees at Mammoth Mountain, California](https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/fs172-96/)

CO2 can settle and kill in low spots, but I bet your meter wasn’t calibrated for temperature or atmospheric pressure.

For demo, put a pound or two of dry ice in a sink and pour in a few gallons of warm water. The resulting fog will sink like a stone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Squink](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Squink](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Squink)\
**Post date:** [March 18, 2021, 9:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/15 "2021-03-18T21:44:25Z")

</div>

[Sulfur hexafluoride is even more fun.](https://duckduckgo.com/?q=sulfur+hexafluoride++float&t=fpas&iar=videos&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dee2NaYRnRGohttps://duckduckgo.com/?q=sulfur+hexafluoride++float&t=fpas&iar=videos&iax=videos&ia=videos&iai=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3Dee2NaYRnRGo)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ZurBob](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/71e660/32.png) [@ZurBob](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ZurBob)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2021, 12:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/16 "2021-03-19T00:02:46Z")

</div>

As one responsible for calibrating various air monitoring sensors in a very regulated industrial environment, don’t be too concerned with random friends/acquaintances so called “monitor” readings. They can be extremely inaccurate.  
Please consult a professional

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/do_not_taunt/32/2968_2.png) [@Do\_Not\_Taunt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Do_Not_Taunt)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2021, 3:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/17 "2021-03-19T03:09:07Z")

</div>

I’m definitely not going to be consulting any professionals here. At a minimum, I’m just curious about the overall CO2 concentrations in the local area, and how that might differ from global averages. At most, I’d want to measure and track the concentration in my basement. Any recommendations on consumer-grade devices that are accurate enough to be useful? Or are they all just garbage?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2021, 6:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/18 "2021-03-19T06:00:08Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> so the fact that carbon dioxide is denser than air is irrelevant.

Tell that to the people that get killed by it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Machine\_Elf](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/82dd89/32.png) [@Machine\_Elf](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Machine_Elf)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2021, 10:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/19 "2021-03-19T10:23:59Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Nobody, least of all me, is suggesting stratification. Just that, if there were a source of CO2 somewhere (you know, the thing you’re suggesting), that denser gas would flow downhill before complete mixture occurred. That CO2 is denser than air as a whole is not controversial.

We agree that if there’s a release of a large quantity of CO2, it can flow downhill en masse before mixing with ambient air very much. See Lake Nyos, 1986:

> **[Lake Nyos disaster](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lake_Nyos_disaster)**
>
> On 21 August 1986, a limnic eruption at Lake Nyos in northwestern Cameroon killed 1,746 people and 3,500 livestock.
> The eruption triggered the sudden release of about 100,000–300,000 tons (1.6 million tons, according to some sources\[who?\]) of carbon dioxide (CO2). The gas cloud initially rose at nearly 100 kilometres per hour (62 mph; 28 m/s) and then, being heavier than air, descended onto nearby villages, suffocating people and livestock within 25 kilometres (16 mi) of the lake.
> A degassin...

Squink’s link (_hey, that rhymes!_) also shows that when high concentrations of CO2 are slowly emitted into small spaces with little or no circulation (e.g.residential basements, snow caves, etc.), it can linger there.

However, the most common sources for CO2 in a residential area like the OP described are gasoline-fueled cars. Their exhaust is at most 12% CO2 (diesel exhaust has even less), and the first thing that happens to that exhaust after leaving the tailpipe is that it gets mixed with a massive volume of ambient air in the turbulent wake of the car itself. Any ambient wind will then cause this mixture to move across the terrain, resulting in mixing with even larger quantities of air. Whatever mixture is drifting downwind of a roadway, I’d be very surprised if the density were greater than ambient by a sufficient margin to compel said mixture to settle, in a buoyancy-driven manner, into a “dip”.

I am assuming by “dip” you mean a small, very local minimum in elevation. My answer changes if, by “dip” you were referring to a larger terrain feature like a canyon or valley, which may be vulnerable to an atmospheric inversion that can trap pollution emitted near the ground.

> **[Inversion (meteorology) | Atmospheric consequences](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inversion_(meteorology)#Atmospheric_consequences)**
>
> Temperature inversions stop atmospheric convection (which is normally present) from happening in the affected area and can lead to high concentrations of atmospheric pollutants. Cities especially suffer from the effects of temperature inversions because they both produce more atmospheric pollutants and have higher thermal masses than rural areas, resulting in more frequent inversions with higher concentrations of pollutants. The effects are even more pronounced when a city is surrounded by hills ...

However, it must be noted that inversions are a consequence of atmospheric temperature profiles, not differences in composition: an inversion traps a warmer parcel of air near the ground, regardless of whether it’s got an elevated CO2 concentration or not. In other words, high ground-level CO2 concentrations are a consequence of inversions, not a cause of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [March 19, 2021, 10:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192/20 "2021-03-19T10:34:51Z")

</div>

To be clear: I didn’t actually say that CO2 doesn’t pool in low-lying areas. What I said was that its density relative to the surrounding air was irrelevant.

Gases flow in all directions. They flow downhill a bit more than they flow uphill. The amount by which a gas flows down more than up depends on its density. But the density of the surrounding air doesn’t matter. If our atmosphere were composed mostly of sulfur hexafluoride or of hydrogen, carbon dioxide would still pool to the same degree it does here.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-well-mixed-is-co2/938192.md?page=2)
