# How were mental disorders regarded before officially classified?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [June 30, 2020, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837 "2020-06-30T19:52:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2020, 7:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/1 "2020-06-30T19:52:12Z")

</div>

Disorders or conditions such as autism, Aspergers, depression, OCD, narcissism, bipolar, Munchausen or Munchausen by proxy obviously existed long before there was a clinical name for them. But how were they regarded in ancient or medieval eras - was there any term for such behavior, or how did society regard such people?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kenobi\_65](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kenobi_65/32/13178_2.png) [@kenobi\_65](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kenobi_65)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2020, 8:37pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/2 "2020-06-30T20:37:02Z")

</div>

Those with psychological or mental disorders were apparently often believed to be possesed by demons or evil spirits, had made a pact with an evil spirit or were practitioners of (or victims of) witchcraft, or perhaps cursed by an angry god.

As per [this article](https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wsu-sandbox/chapter/mental-health-treatment-past-and-present/):

> [@](#):
>
> For much of history, the mentally ill have been treated very poorly. It was believed that mental illness was caused by demonic possession, witchcraft, or an angry god (Szasz, 1960). For example, in medieval times, abnormal behaviors were viewed as a sign that a person was possessed by demons. If someone was considered to be possessed, there were several forms of treatment to release spirits from the individual. The most common treatment was exorcism, often conducted by priests or other religious figures: Incantations and prayers were said over the person’s body, and she may have been given some medicinal drinks. Another form of treatment for extreme cases of mental illness was trephining: A small hole was made in the afflicted individual’s skull to release spirits from the body. Most people treated in this manner died. In addition to exorcism and trephining, other practices involved execution or imprisonment of people with psychological disorders. Still others were left to be homeless beggars. Generally speaking, most people who exhibited strange behaviors were greatly misunderstood and treated cruelly. The prevailing theory of psychopathology in earlier history was the idea that mental illness was the result of demonic possession by either an evil spirit or an evil god because early beliefs incorrectly attributed all unexplainable phenomena to deities deemed either good or evil.
> 
> From the late 1400s to the late 1600s, a common belief perpetuated by some religious organizations was that some people made pacts with the devil and committed horrible acts, such as eating babies (Blumberg, 2007). These people were considered to be witches and were tried and condemned by courts—they were often burned at the stake. Worldwide, it is estimated that tens of thousands of mentally ill people were killed after being accused of being witches or under the influence of witchcraft (Hemphill, 1966)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bijou\_Drains](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bijou_drains/32/2814_2.png) [@Bijou\_Drains](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bijou_Drains)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2020, 9:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/3 "2020-06-30T21:07:17Z")

</div>

For a short time there was a treatment where they pulled all the teeth of a person who was mentally ill . As you might have guessed that doesn’t work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![hogarth](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hogarth/32/1773_2.png) [@hogarth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/hogarth)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2020, 9:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/4 "2020-06-30T21:26:05Z")

</div>

Long after the medieval period, Samuel Johnson probably suffered from what we nowadays call depression and Tourette syndrome. He was worried that he was in the grip of generic “madness”. Other people thought his verbal and physical tics were the sign of rudeness, and he was quoted as saying he behaved the way he did “from bad habit”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![smithsb](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/smithsb/32/12107_2.png) [@smithsb](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/smithsb)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2020, 10:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/5 "2020-06-30T22:21:32Z")

</div>

Mental retardation. The terms mildly, moderate or profoundly/seriously were often added. Later terminology included intellectually disabled or intellectual disability.

> **[Intellectual disability](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intellectual_disability)**
>
> Pages for logged out editors learn more
> 
> 		 
> Intellectual disability (ID), also known as general learning disability in the United Kingdom and formerly mental retardation, is a generalized neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by significantly impaired intellectual and adaptive functioning. It is defined by an IQ under 70, in addition to deficits in two or more adaptive behaviors that affect everyday, general living. Intellectual functions are defined under DSM-V as reasoning, problem‑so...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Fretful\_Porpentine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/fretful_porpentine/32/2873_2.png) [@Fretful\_Porpentine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Fretful_Porpentine)\
**Post date:** [June 30, 2020, 10:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/6 "2020-06-30T22:23:34Z")

</div>

They could be understood in several different ways, even in the same person. For example, the fifteenth-century mystic Margery Kempe (author of what is often considered the first autobiography in English) had at least one episode of what would now probably be diagnosed as postpartum psychosis, and engaged in a lot of weird behavior that usually makes modern-day readers perceive her as mentally ill – having visions, holding long conversations with God, experiencing frequent, public episodes of crying and weeping over which she claimed to have no control. Pretty much everybody in her narrative, including Margery herself, understood her first episode of illness after childbirth to be a sign of demonic possession, though with a certain layer of moral choice (in her words, she “went out of her mind and was wonderly vexed and labored with spirits … she desired all wickedness; like as the spirits tempted her to say and do she said and did”). But most of her other odd behavior could clearly be interpreted and classified in various ways, within the context of her society – Margery herself, along with many other people, understood it as a sign of special favor from God, while others interpreted it variously as possession by wicked spirits, drunkenness, or a bodily illness, and at several points in her life she was accused of heresy (a sin which requires the mental capacity to make rational choices – if you are a heretic, you are not insane, and vice versa).

She got off, by the way, in large part thanks to her rhetorical cleverness as well as the fact that her theological beliefs genuinely _were_ orthodox, and she seems to have been perfectly functional through most of her life – raising fourteen children, running a couple of businesses, and embarking on a remarkable set of pilgrimages to destinations that included Rome, Jerusalem, Santiago de Compostela, and Sweden.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AHunter3](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ahunter3/32/368_2.png) [@AHunter3](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AHunter3)\
**Post date:** [July 1, 2020, 3:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-were-mental-disorders-regarded-before-officially-classified/913837/7 "2020-07-01T03:05:31Z")

</div>

> [@Velocity](#):
>
> Disorders or conditions such as autism, Aspergers, depression, OCD, narcissism, bipolar, Munchausen or Munchausen by proxy obviously existed long before there was a clinical name for them

Cite?

OK, more seriously, there were, and are, patterns of cognition and behavior. Since they do form patterns, we, observing them, recognize their reoccurrence. It’s not just “Gee this person thinks and behaves kinda weirdly”, it’s “Gee, this person’s weirdness sure does remind me of that person I knew a couple years ago, very similar pattern…”

But for the most part, that’s all we’ve done so far: categorize them, put a name on the patterns that we’ve observed. We don’t know very much—hardly anything, actually—about what causes it or what it means. We don’t know in a real, legitimate, scientific sort of way, which of these various patterns is a pattern that you, or I, or the person down the block would exhibit under certain circumstances, versus which ones are patterns that only those individuals who have a neurological or hormonal (or other) fundamental difference from the rest of us will be prone to. Or (just to avoid the excluded middle) which of these differences are modes that anyone can fall into but which some people are much more susceptible to being thrown into by circumstances than other people are.

At any rate, recognizing a pattern and giving it a name is not the same thing as understanding it or explaining it. The degree to which we’ve improved over “that person is possessed by demons” as an explanatory viewpoint is greatly exaggerated. If those medieval folk had developed a typology of which demons made you inert and withdrawn when they possessed you and which ones made you frenetic and antsy instead, we’d be hard pressed to show that we understood it any better than they did.

What I’ve just described may not bear a close resemblance to what you’ve been led to believe. It is an unfortunate fact that a lot of the claim about the state of our knowledge of mental disorders has never been validated and doesn’t qualify as factual.
