Hasn’t settled but has moved eh? Has every part moved exactly the same distance plus or minus one inch?
What in God’s name are you talking about? Why are you converting water into power? Is it related to my post in any way?
One long ramp all the way to the top of the pyramid? Thats the only ramp configuration you can imagine?
On your criteria? No one understands the Time Cube, either–and for the same reason.
Yeah, this is starting to rival Time Cube for sheer tenacious resistance to reason.
Except for those pesky ramps that we still have traces of.
How in Hell did a perfect sphere enter the conversation? (If it did enter the conversation in a non-insane manner, please forgive me. I don’t waste my time reading all the claptrap you post.)
sigh We KNOW metric. We just won’t be bullied into USING it by all you little countries. :rolleyes:
[QUOTE=dropzone]
How in Hell did a perfect sphere enter the conversation? (If it did enter the conversation in a non-insane manner, please forgive me. I don’t waste my time reading all the claptrap you post.)
[/QUOTE]
I believe that they needed the perfect sphere for the anti-gravity device to contact the mother ship, silly. You KNOW this I’m sure…it’s really the only way to contact a mother ship when flooding a plateau while using geyser powered lifting mechanisms!
Piffle, the reason why you go for the straw man is clear (and by not clarifying what less impressive ramps are theorized to had been used with a combination of lifts) you only attempt to make it sound sound ridiculous, when in reality the one that is being discredited is your ideas when you use those straw men.
So, any progress made on the name of the king that you declared that egyptologists told us that ruled for 400 years?
BTW you seem to indeed continue to ignore that there are very scientific ways to deduce the years of the rules of the kings, no problem for us, but it still points at you just relying on gross ignorance as usual for your declarations.
We already linked to evidence of ramps in many pyramids, while your evidence is just amounting to zero. We also know that you put the geyser away from the pyramid or next to it depending on the many problems we pointed out that using geysers would get you.
…
1.11 gal of natron would not get you a constant and reliable geyser. And besides that you would need much more or that to inject it underground, with another bore hole that clearly you or the PT forgot about.
Not to mention linguists:
“She Say, She Go, She Be like”: Verbs of Quotation over Time in African American Vernacular English.
The Syntactic and Stylistic Development of the Infinitive in Middle English.
Why, you can even write a book about the absence of a word in a language:
Street Conscious Copula Variation in the Hip Hop Nation.
So, as usual, cladking’s linguistic maunderings are about as vapid as his insights on geology, engineering, and history. Dude’s consistent, I’ll give him that.
The idea came from the fact (?) that the Pyramids “follow the curvature of the earth.” i.e., the bases aren’t geometrically flat, but “lower” at the edges than at the center. All that really matters is a section of the surface of a sphere, some few acres in extent.
I think most people hold that, yes, the ancients used water-leveling to ensure that the base of the pyramid is level, but cladking is the only one I’ve ever heard who suggested the entire building site was flooded in order to create a “waterline” as a foundation line.
And it has to be a sphere of purest gold, and some forty feet in diameter – no, wait, make that eighty – for the purposes of Holy Cirin.
Is this the pouring of concrete floors that you’re talking about, here? (Not goint to read back to see.) The reason that concrete floors aren’t poured in large stretches is that they’ll crack if you don’t put in expansion joints, etc. Thermal expansion/contraction and all.
Standard concrete will sag a bit in the middle of an expanse because it dries from the outside, in. There are additives that will cause it to expand as it dries, making it rise (very slightly) like bread dough. “Control of altitude” has nothing to do with it.
And it got really word salad after that. But let’s pause and confirm that your geometry is way off. A ditch around a big square will be less and less of a percentage of the area of the square the bigger the square gets. Not that I know why anyone would want a pyramid-sized water level. Ah, competing theories (scroll down to the Leveling section). I like the Egyptian Level better. If it’s already been mentioned, I apologize.
Simple Machine Theory: aka the fulcrum and the Lever.
http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~jason2/papers/pyramid.htm
The diagrams helped me to visualize how something as this method would proceed.
Smaller stones used as the counterweights could be endlessly used and passed up from course to course.
I think the water was for drinking purposes, and perhaps lube for clay or sand, to help slide move the blocks into position, but not as a counterweight.
missed the edit: I think the lifting beams diameter would have to be at LEAST 1-2 feet, not the 6-12 inches the author suggested. Perhaps even larger.
cladking, did you watch that episode of Star Trek any time abouts where you discovered the truth behing Ancient Egyptian?
I had forgotten about the Darmok episode but certainly noticed it pretty fast when I saw it again a few years ago.
“Tamarian” has a few similarities to the ancient language. Computer languages are a much closer approximation though.
And the less one understands either, the more similar they become. I bet you have an extremely hard time telling one from the other at this point, right?
Large pieces of concrete would undergo more breakage due to expansion.
This isn’t a major effect on a large flat piece is it?
The amount of water lost from a ditch is proportional to its size but is also dependent on the type of soil. In this case (karst) much of the loss is is independent of the size but more related to its depth and lenght.
So long as ramps are debunked and the debunkment was successfully challenged a few pages back and every word you used to “prove” ramps" was shown to be wrong it seems strange you’d say there is evidence fpor ramps here. There are no ramps in evidence that could lift stones up on great pyramids. Every “ramp” points away from the pyramids or at their base. ALL of the evidence disproves rampsd were used and they are debunked (see post #152).
Even tiny amounts of sweets and salts will trigger an eruption in water saturated in CO2. “The dead king lives on sweets and fumigations in the earth”. Of course it’s possible these people were sun addled but were instead breathing ant poison provided by their alien overlords. Not very possible but everything has tobe explained somehow and this doesn’t look like a magic spell.
Unless you’re M C Esher it’s IMPOSSIBLE to design any ramp system that gains 480’ without it being a mile long. Of ccourse this presumes you don’t just make it much steeper.
Please assume the statement makes sense and look for the logic in it. Once you find the logic then argue with me if you still want to. If you can’t find the logic then please ask for an elaboration or explanation. If you assume everything someone says is illogical or nonsensical then communication will fail.
Yes. The pyramids are near a transform plate boundary and founded on solid rock about 30km thick. Of course this “solid rock” is riddled with caves down to two km because the Nile was once a huge canyon here.
Water was the power to lift stones on the pyramid. They didn’t waste even small amounts they certainly wouldn’t waste it .15 acre feet at a time.