How widespread was the "flapper" sensation of the 1920s?

Given that there was a film released in the USA in 1918 entitled “Flappers and Friskies,” it’s pretty clear that the phenom was pre-1920s (although it likely didn’t percolate downwards to what I may refer to as “middle America” until the 20s–again, compare to the 60s hippy thing and even the rap movement.

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0146756/

There was an even earlier film, “Flapper Goes to School,” in 1916: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0293159/

I think there’s a lot to be said for the theory that the First World War brought in a lot of fashion changes for women, as so many in Europe and later America, were on War Work–in factories, or doing previously male jobs such as bus conductor, etc.

In my grandparents wedding picture that was taken in 1926 or 1927, my grandmother who grew up in Hunter, Okla. (even more rural and remote than the college town of Stillwater) looked like a flapper to me. She had the bangs and bobbed hair, the style of dress associated in my mind with a flapper and a long pearl necklace.

From Wikipedia:

"Flapper independence may have its origins in the Gibson girls of the 1890s. Although that pre-war look does not resemble the flapper identity, their independence and feminism may have led to the flapper wise-cracking tenacity thirty years later.

"The term flapper first appears in Britain, based on a perceived similarity to young birds vainly trying to leave the nest. While many in the United States assumed at the time that the term “flapper” derived from a fashion of wearing galoshes unbuckled so that they flapped, the term was documented in use in the UK as early as 1912.

“From the 1900s into the 1920s flapper was a term for any impetuous teenaged girl. Only in the 1920s did the term take on the meaning of the flapper generation style and attitudes. Flappers as a social group were well defined from other 1920s fads.”

The death was the hippie was “staged” perhaps, but it didn’t take. 1967 in San Francisco is remembered as the Summer of Love, not the end of hipdom. Here’s just one example of where the hipsters went after that. (Hint: It wasn’t California and they’re still here.) :slight_smile:

And according to this source on fashion history, flapper fashions were easily affordable:

Buttrick dress patterns made the difference. Flapper shifts were an easy style to make at home.

And the behavior wasn’t particularly expensive to mimic.

In fact, those short skirts weren’t even in style until 1926, so if the fad was over in NYC by 1922, they missed out on a lot of the fun. By 1928 the “curtains” were lowered again.

Zelda was the thing waiting for the word that would symbolize her. And that word was flapper.. She was ahead of her time – one of the trend setters.

Recommended reading: Zelda, a biography by Nancy Milford

I can’t think of anyone who better fits the name.

Frankly, there is a very strong contender to challenge her for the title.

LINK

Lovely Lulu…

According to a Wikipedia article, Louise Brooks was born in Cherryvale Kansas. That is a tiny town, and I believe it’s always been rather small. I’d say the flapper craze was indeed, widespread.

Zoe, you appear to have misunderstood everything I was trying to say, so let me try again.

There are almost always two separate and easily distinguishable waves in every social-cultural fad. The first comes from the inner core who initiate it and set up its distinctive mannerisms. The second is the larger and more widespread adoption of the fad by those who take their cues from the fashion leaders.

I separated out the two groups deliberately. Scott himself is my source for saying that his set burned out on flapperdom by 1922. He also said that “the sequel was a children’s party taken over by elders.” Of course others took up the look afterward. Same with hippies. You can see the difference between the real hippies, for whom the Summer of Love was a culmination, and the desperate wannabes who flooded to San Francisco in their wake. It’s the difference between Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters as Tom Wolfe wrote about them and the drug-addled underage victims of predators in the Haight-Ashberry that Joan Didion wrote about in Slouching Toward Bethlehem. The separation between them was close in time and huge in distance.

Now, did the flapper look evolve from 1920 on? Certainly, just as Mary Quant’s first minidresses didn’t look much like the hippie garb of the late 1960s. Did the very short skirt come in later? Yes, it did. But that was only a modification of the flapper look, which had already been around for years.

In the same way, there were only a tiny number of hippies outside of a few major cities in 1967. Most of us looked like we had in 1962. Hippieness did not pervade the rest of the country until several years later.

As for social class, the middle class as a whole was far smaller even as a percent of the population in the 1920s than it is today. Few working class girls could ever be flappers, and that meant that more than half that age group in the population could never be included. Flappers implied a lifestyle simply incompatible with lack of money.

Louise Brooks may have been a flapper but hardly an original one. Scott describes her as “lovely and expensive and about nineteen.” Since she was born in 1906, this would put her around 1925, long after Zelda and the others invented flapperdom. She might have been an inspiration to the hinterland wannabes, though.

And what does her place of birth have to do with anything? She wasn’t a flapper in 1906 or at any time in her childhood. But she had been in NYC since 1922, as a member of a modern dance troupe, about as culturally distant from Kansas as it was possible to get. By 1925 she was a Follies girl and Charlie Chaplin’s lover. Toto, I don’t think we’re in Kansas anymore.

My grandmother’s First Communion picture was probably in 1927 or 1928. She was 12 or so. She’s got bobbed hair, the dropped waisted dress, etc. (This was in Pittsburgh.) When kids start wearing a fashion for churchly occaisions, it’s hit the masses (and therefore is ever so passe for the trendy who started the whole thing).

I’m sorry, Exapno, but that just isn’t a good cite. They don’t provide the maker of the dress or its provenance, and just date it at 1920. I know it was probably just a kick Google-grab, but looking through the rest of the fashion tour, they don’t cite the sources for any of their images, and quite a few of them have been lifted from different (modern) patternmakers or from different vintage clothing sellers and museum websites. Several items are also misidentified. I’m willing to believe the idea, since similar fashions were seen in Paris, bobbed hair had been around since 1914, etc., but your cite doesn’t stand up to scrutiny.

The Fitzgeralds might have given us the nascent beginnings, but our perception of the era is shaped by those who came afterwards. Fashion history usually dates “the look” as really taking hold from 1925-28, and Louise Brooks is viewed, not as a trendsetter, as someone for the general public to emulate. Just because the fashion was started by someone else, who burnt out on it early, doesn’t mean that late-comers didn’t have anything to contribute. Though the forerunners had finished, the race was not over. The contribution of Brooks et al to the perception of the period is not mitigated by the time they entered it. If the flapper craze had died out in 1922, then it would barely register on our historical radar.

Again, if the hippie craze died out by 1967 we wouldn’t be talking about it now either. That doesn’t mean that the real hippies weren’t c1965-67 and the plastic hippies later. I was never in my life a hippie, but by 1972 I had the hair, the political attitude, the record collection, and the clothes.

Beatniks, OTOH, never achieved that true second movement that turned them into a national phase. We remember the Beats because their cultural attainments were large, but the only beatnik that ever made it onto television was Maynard G. Krebs.

Flappers, however, grew out of three major events: World War I, which gave thousands of men a firsthand look of Europe an isolationist America never had plus the disillusionment of the war’s aftermath; Women’s Suffrage; and Prohibition. American culture started changing immediately after the doughboys grand return in 1919. By 1920, the trends were already well under way. Let’s look at contemporary sources.

For our purposes, the story to read in Fitzgerald’s Flappers and Philosophers is “Bernice Bobs Her Hair,” a short course in female cattiness circa 1920. His This Side of Paradise drove parents as hysterical as Elvis Presley and the Beatles later did.

A Flapper’s Appeal to Parents" by Ellen Welles Page: Published in Outlook, December 6, 1922, p. 607. is interesting, for it implies that flapperdom is already old, changing, and dividing into segments.

Frederick Lewis Allen’s Only Yesterday, a history of the 1920s published in 1931, has this to say:

I’m not denying for a moment that the flapper image floated through the entire decade. But every bit of it, except possibly for the shortest of skirts, was in place and actively pursued by 1920. The clothes, the hair, the makeup, the cigarette smoking, the openness toward sex, the dancing, the drinking, the jazz, the whole package. It changed over the decade; it went into more homes; it became more extreme.

I think my real point is that flappers were more than just a “look” in the same way hippies were more than just “long hair.” If that’s all you go by, your chronology will be off.

And the image of the Flapper is not quite unfamiliar YET. LINK Link is work-safe, see frame 2.

Coincidence? Serendipity? Synchronicity?

Whatever. I just opened the new issue of American Heritage (February/March 2006) and found an article on flappers!

A short article, at least, mostly a recognition of the new book Flapper: A Madcap Story of Sex, Style, Celebrity, and the Women Who Made America Modern, by Joshua Zeitz.

How widespread were flappers? The article gives a tantalizing hint from a 1923 NYTimes newspaper report:

There’s also a still from the 1928 movie Our Dancing Daughters with Dorothy Sebastian, Joan Crawford, and Anita Page that would give the PTA heart attacks. What gams!

My mother was a teenager in Cleveland’s Jewish “ghetto” during the '20s, and I have photos showing her and her sisters in full flapper drag. And during prohibition, my grandparents operated a still behind their bakery.

Hey! Southern Baptists do plenty of stuff that you could rag us about, but this ain’t one of them! I work with our youth group and we have live bands and dancing just about every service. There may be some SB churches that discourage or disapprove of dancing but that would be a product of the local church, not denominational theology. Try the Primitive Baptists down the street.

It may also be a product of the era as to how much (if any) dancing SB churches allow. Era, location, individual church policy, all may be involved. But in the 50’s when slow dancing with couples in close contact was still the norm, the SB churches I attended, one in a small town and another in a city, both frowned on dancing. Whether rock-based dancing-at-a-distance modified the objections to dancing in general, I don’t remember. My parents were No Dancing regardless types. I was a full adult before I danced my first step.

BTW, you know why Baptists don’t make love standing up, don’t you? :smiley:

Demographically the US was still a rural, farming nation in the 1920s, and the cities were still largely populated by recent immigrants. Not sure how the fashions trickled down to those two groups but I should think the actual lifestyle was a possibility for very few.