# How will Bush try to win the election ?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 5, 2004, 1:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661 "2004-02-05T13:38:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 4\
**Page:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mack](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/b19c9b/32.png) [@mack](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mack)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2004, 1:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661/81 "2004-02-22T01:23:58Z")

</div>

> [@UncleBeer](#):
>
> Just in? Just in . . . what? Just in the wrong thread? I thought this one was supposed to be discussing the campaign tactics Bush might use late in the race. There’s a whole bunch of places you can put your partisan bashing. Why do you feel the need to poison every single political thread with inane off-topic comments?

Well, if the topic is how will Bush win the election then it’s very _on_ topic because he’s not going to win by proclaiming utter bullshit like 2.6 million new jobs by the end of the year. Does anybody really believe this? It’s just another turd that he laid and walked away from, letting others clean up the mess. They’re beginning to stink up the joint.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ElvisL1ves](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/5daacb/32.png) [@ElvisL1ves](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ElvisL1ves)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2004, 5:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661/82 "2004-02-23T05:28:12Z")

</div>

**Unc** , done as you’ve requested and unfortunately made necessary. You might, meanwhile, check the top of the first page of the forum for the sticky about personal attacks. **Sam** , you too, while you’re at it, since you seem to be confused about the point.

**DSY** , [this](http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A60619-2004Feb21.html) writeup makes it clearer than I have that your legal analysis, however careful or even correct, is still _irrelevant_. Not only that, the legal case isn’t airtight either, depending on an FEC ruling yet to be made about Mrs. Kerry being an “agent” of his campaign. It also underscores the point I am now bored with trying to get you to see, that such a decision would be made on a political rather than legal basis. Now can you please go back to the topic of the OP, and in the future avoid making flat statements such as about how he “can’t” get his wife’s money? You ought to know by now what trouble you can get into that way.

Nice try, incidentally, demanding that this thread \*not \* go further into how Bush will try to win the election, despite it being the very title. It’s already been mentioned how he’ll try to paint Kerry as a tool of the special interests, and that isn’t even speculation, it being the subject of the first ad he’s run. You may not like where that discussion goes, but we’re about dispelling ignorance here even when it may prove painful. Now learn to cope.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![UncleBeer](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/977dab/32.png) [@UncleBeer](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/UncleBeer)\
**Post date:** [February 23, 2004, 3:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661/83 "2004-02-23T15:10:24Z")

</div>

Snort. Don’t make me laugh.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSYoungEsq](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/c6cbf5/32.png) [@DSYoungEsq](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSYoungEsq)\
**Post date:** [February 24, 2004, 4:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661/84 "2004-02-24T16:33:18Z")

</div>

I’d love to read that article, but I’m not a registered user of the Washington Post’s website, and won’t register for any site that requires I divulge such things as gender, occupation, and “primary responsibility” to use their site.

I’ve seen the information from that article excerpted in another article; it didn’t read as much more than the same information produced by _USA Today_, but without the article, I can’t tell for sure.

AND, I notice that you **still refuse to answer my questions.**

> [@](#):
>
> It’s already been mentioned how he’ll try to paint Kerry as a tool of the special interests, and that isn’t even speculation, it being the subject of the first ad he’s run. You may not like where that discussion goes, but we’re about dispelling ignorance here even when it may prove painful. Now learn to cope.

You haven’t done anything to “dispell ignorance” in any post of yours I’ve ever seen, so you’ll pardon me if I chuckle quietly about such a statement. A discussion of what the President will do to win the election is quite different from a debate about whether or not Mr. Kerry is more corrupt than Mr. Bush. Even _I_ can tell that difference.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/how-will-bush-try-to-win-the-election/227661.md?page=4)
