# Hypothetically: The Chief of Police commits and admits he commited a felony...\[Edited title\]

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [June 7, 2011, 7:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607 "2011-06-07T07:01:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 7:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/1 "2011-06-07T07:01:32Z")

</div>

…in the town, village, or city that you live in.

Should he be charged?

Even if he’s not, should he resign?

If he doesn’t resign…does he have any credibility?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 7:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/2 "2011-06-07T07:52:28Z")

</div>

Of course he should be charged. He committed a felony.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 8:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/3 "2011-06-07T08:54:17Z")

</div>

> [@Alessan](#):
>
> Of course he should be charged. He committed a felony.

Yeah. What an odd question. The law applies to everyone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shade](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/2bfe46/32.png) [@Shade](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shade)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 12:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/4 "2011-06-07T12:43:20Z")

</div>

You mean, now? Not just, he committed a crime, served his time, rehabilitated himself, and eventually became police chief?

Isn’t “commit a crime” -\> “get arrested, tried and imprisoned” pretty clear in the law? AIUI only a very few people (the head of state, visiting ambassadors) are immune to the process. There is SOMETIMES an argument to say that “this group of people are sufficiently trusted we don’t mind if they break the law in a good cause”. But you can’t just hand out carte blanche to the police to rape and murder at will. Because if you do, even if the current police force is a paragon of virtue who will only use those loopholes for good (which is entirely possible) it will act like flies to shit for succeeding generations of psychopaths to become police officers in order to get power and abuse trust. That’s happening now, why on earth would anyone want it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/e36b37/32.png) [@Airman\_Doors\_USAF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Airman_Doors_USAF)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 12:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/5 "2011-06-07T12:55:07Z")

</div>

It depends on the context.

If it happened a long time ago, it depends on the crime (keeping in mind that a 3rd-4th DUI in some locales is a felony).

If it happened in the course of his duties as police chief he should be nailed to the wall.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shiftless](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9c0ed/32.png) [@shiftless](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shiftless)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 1:03pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/6 "2011-06-07T13:03:04Z")

</div>

Of course he should be charged and the rest of the police force should be leading the charge. If the chief law enforcement officer doesn’t feel a need to obey the law then the rest of us certainly shouldn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Omar\_Little](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omar_little/32/269_2.png) [@Omar\_Little](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omar_Little)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 1:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/7 "2011-06-07T13:20:01Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> …in the town, village, or city that you live in.
> 
> Should he be charged?
> 
> Even if he’s not, should he resign?
> 
> If he doesn’t resign…does he have any credibility?

Is this a serious question or random opinion seeking?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Ellen\_Cherry](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ellen_cherry/32/3600_2.png) [@Ellen\_Cherry](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Ellen_Cherry)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 1:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/8 "2011-06-07T13:59:48Z")

</div>

Maybe **pkbites** will come back and give more info. It sounds like there’s an actual situation lurking around this question, which prompted the hypothetical-sounding OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tom\_Tildrum](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e95f7d/32.png) [@Tom\_Tildrum](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tom_Tildrum)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/9 "2011-06-07T15:05:24Z")

</div>

> [@Ellen\_Cherry](#):
>
> Maybe **pkbites** will come back and give more info. It sounds like there’s an actual situation lurking around this question, which prompted the hypothetical-sounding OP.

The OP is or was a police officer, if memory serves.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ultrafilter](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/3d9bf3/32.png) [@ultrafilter](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ultrafilter)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 3:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/10 "2011-06-07T15:05:51Z")

</div>

> [@Airman\_Doors\_USAF](#):
>
> It depends on the context.
> 
> If it happened a long time ago, it depends on the crime (keeping in mind that a 3rd-4th DUI in some locales is a felony).
> 
> If it happened in the course of his duties as police chief he should be nailed to the wall.

This.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 3:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/11 "2011-06-07T15:16:51Z")

</div>

Of course the law should apply to him. Now, not all laws are just and blah blah blah, but that applies to him as well as anyone else.

Of course, here in Illinois, we’d probably vote him Governor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 3:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/12 "2011-06-07T15:39:16Z")

</div>

> [@Ellen\_Cherry](#):
>
> Maybe **pkbites** will come back and give more info. It sounds like there’s an actual situation lurking around this question, which prompted the hypothetical-sounding OP.

Exactly. I think we should wait until we hear the rest of the OP.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hypnagogic\_Jerk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/hypnagogic_jerk/32/4252_2.png) [@Hypnagogic\_Jerk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hypnagogic_Jerk)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 3:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/13 "2011-06-07T15:47:57Z")

</div>

> [@Tom\_Tildrum](#):
>
> The OP is or was a police officer, if memory serves.

He was (I believe he’s now retired). There seems to be a common belief among police officers that they should be, if not completely above the law, at least given more leeway when they break it, and so many police corps frown on investigating their officers. To me that’s nothing but good ol’ boyism, and an attitude which we must stamp out. Still, it’s not uncommon, and for this reason:

> [@shiftless](#):
>
> Of course he should be charged **and the rest of the police force should be leading the charge**.

(bolding mine)  
I’m not sure I agree with this. Yes, he should be charged, but I’m not sure I trust his force to investigate the charges. Another police corps should probably be in charge of the investigation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Johanna](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/johanna/32/8318_2.png) [@Johanna](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Johanna)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 3:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/14 "2011-06-07T15:49:10Z")

</div>

Why is this even a question? This takes the concept of “no-brainer” to a new level.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![shiftless](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e9c0ed/32.png) [@shiftless](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/shiftless)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 4:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/15 "2011-06-07T16:17:39Z")

</div>

> [@Hypnagogic\_Jerk](#):
>
> I’m not sure I agree with this. Yes, he should be charged, but I’m not sure I trust his force to investigate the charges. Another police corps should probably be in charge of the investigation.

No, no, we agree. I should have used another phrase.

… the rest of the police force should be leading the _denunciation of the law breaker._ Yes, someone other than the chief’s team should be doing the investigation. Anything else would be a conflict of interest.

Anyone else who obstructed a criminal investigation would be frowned upon by the police, perhaps even charged with a crime. Police officers should be no different just because they are paid out of the public coffers.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/e8c25b/32.png) [@Really\_Not\_All\_That\_Bright](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Really_Not_All_That_Bright)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/16 "2011-06-07T16:27:25Z")

</div>

Who does he admit it to? Are they credible? Assuming the admission meets the standard of evidence needed to charge a civilian, then of course he should be charged. If it happened a long time ago, then presumably the relevant statute of limitations has expired, so no.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pkbites](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/pkbites/32/204_2.png) [@pkbites](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pkbites)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 4:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/17 "2011-06-07T16:50:54Z")

</div>

> [@shiftless](#):
>
> If the chief law enforcement officer doesn’t feel a need to obey the law then the rest of us certainly shouldn’t.

Nitpick: The Chief of police is just that, the Chief of police. The CLEO (Chief Law Enforcement Officer) is the Sheriff.

> [@Tom\_Tildrum](#):
>
> The OP is or was a police officer, if memory serves.

25 years full time. I retired, then took a position with another department part-time.  
Does it matter if the felony the Chief admits to is a law that is rarely enforced, ergo the average person usually isn’t charged for committing it either? But it’s still on the books and is still a felony. The D.A. announces he will not charge the Chief for the violation. Should the Chief still step down?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WhyNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/c77e96/32.png) [@WhyNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WhyNot)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 5:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/18 "2011-06-07T17:01:45Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Does it matter if the felony the Chief admits to is a law that is rarely enforced, ergo the average person usually isn’t charged for committing it either? But it’s still on the books and is still a felony. The D.A. announces he will not charge the Chief for the violation. Should the Chief still step down?

Yes, I think it matters, but now we’re into extra sticky levels of ethics, like should the DA have the power to not enforce laws at his whim. There have certainly been cases I thought the DA shouldn’t try when he did, and others I thought he should when he didn’t.

From a theoretical perspective, however, I think even bad laws should be enforced, so there’s some motivation for the legislature/courts to change them so we don’t have situations like this (Chief or not). If Lawrence hadn’t been charged in Texas, the sodomy law wouldn’t have been changed.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Omar\_Little](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/omar_little/32/269_2.png) [@Omar\_Little](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Omar_Little)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 6:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/19 "2011-06-07T18:15:09Z")

</div>

> [@pkbites](#):
>
> Does it matter if the felony the Chief admits to is a law that is rarely enforced, ergo the average person usually isn’t charged for committing it either? But it’s still on the books and is still a felony. The D.A. announces he will not charge the Chief for the violation. Should the Chief still step down?

Still not sure what type of factual answer you are seeking here. Seems like the wrong forum.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Typo\_Negative](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/typo_negative/32/484_2.png) [@Typo\_Negative](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Typo_Negative)\
**Post date:** [June 7, 2011, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607/20 "2011-06-07T18:36:48Z")

</div>

Police Officers, by virtue of the power given to them, should be held to a higher standard.

If he committed the felony while a police officer, he should prosecuted to the full extent of the law.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/hypothetically-the-chief-of-police-commits-and-admits-he-commited-a-felony-edited-title/584607.md?page=2)
