# I am not I: The fastest biochemical event and the speed of light, or, The Bathroom Mirror phenomenon

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [October 6, 2011, 4:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757 "2011-10-06T04:47:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GaryM](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garym/32/241_2.png) [@GaryM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GaryM)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2011, 3:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/21 "2011-10-08T15:06:49Z")

</div>

Now THAT’S a CITE!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Maserschmidt](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/maserschmidt/32/18829_2.png) [@Maserschmidt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Maserschmidt)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2011, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/22 "2011-10-08T15:36:48Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> You want citations that vision is anticipatory, do you? Have at it:
> 
> Aloimonos, Y. (Ed.). (1993). Active Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
> 
> Ballard, D.H. (1991). Animate Vision, Artificial Intelligence, 48, 57-86.
> 
> Blake, A., & Yuille, A. (Eds.). (1992). Active Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
> 
> Bressler, S.L., Tang, W., Sylvester, C.M., Shulman, G.L., & Corbetta, M. (2008). Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention. Journal of Neuroscience (28 #40) 10056-10061.
> 
> Castelhano, M.S., Mack, M.L., & Henderson, J.M. (2009). Viewing Task Influences Eye Movement Control During Active Scene Perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3):6, 1-15: [http://journalofvision.org/9/3/6/](http://journalofvision.org/9/3/6/)
> 
> Findlay, J.M. & Gilchrist, I.D. (2003). Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
> 
> Hayhoe, M. (2000). Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision. Visual Cognition (7) 43-64.
> 
> Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A.S., & Bar M. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65(#2) 145-168. Online: [Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain - PMC](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2099308/)
> 
> Land M.F. & McLeod P. (2000). From eye movements to actions: How batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1340-1345.
> 
> Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., & Pavel, M. (Eds.). (1996). Exploratory Vision: The Active Eye. New York: Springer-Verlag.
> 
> Li, W., Piëch, V., & Gilbert, C.D. (2004). Perceptual Learning and Top-down Influences in Primary Visual Cortex, Nature Neuroscience, 7 #6, 651-657.
> 
> Liu, T., Larsson, J., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron, 55, 313-323.
> 
> Munneke, J., Heslenfeld, D.J., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Directing Attention to a Location in Space Results in Retinotopic Activation in Primary Visual Cortex. Brain Research (1222) 184-191.
> 
> Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
> 
> Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
> 
> O’Regan, J.K. & Noë A. (2001). A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031. (Online: [http://nivea.psycho.univ-paris5.fr/OREGAN-NOE-BBS/ORegan;Noe.BBS.pdf](http://nivea.psycho.univ-paris5.fr/OREGAN-NOE-BBS/ORegan;Noe.BBS.pdf))
> 
> O’Regan J.K. Myin E. Noe A. (2005.) Skill, corporality and alerting capacity in an account of sensory consciousness. Progress in Brain Research (150) 55-68.
> 
> Thomas, N.J.T. (1999). Are Theories of Imagery Theories of Imagination? An Active Perception Approach to Conscious Mental Content. Cognitive Science, 23, (1999) 207-245: [http://www.imagery-imagination.com/im-im/im-im.htm](http://www.imagery-imagination.com/im-im/im-im.htm)
> 
> Roelfsema, P.R., Lamme, V.A.F., & Spekreijse H. (2000). The Implementation of Visual Routines. Vision Research (40) 1385–1411.
> 
> Rothkopf, C.A., Ballard, D.H., & Hayhoe, M.H. (2007). Task and Context Determine Where You Look. Journal of Vision (7 #14:16) 1-20. Online, open access publication: [http://journalofvision.org/7/14/16/](http://journalofvision.org/7/14/16/)
> 
> Sirotin, Y.B. & Das, A. (2009). Anticipatory Haemodynamic Signals in Sensory Cortex Not Predicted by Local Neuronal Activity. Nature (457 #7228) 475-479.

tl;dr!!!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RaftPeople](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6f9a4e/32.png) [@RaftPeople](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RaftPeople)\
**Post date:** [October 8, 2011, 5:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/23 "2011-10-08T17:05:25Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> I didn’t say random stimuli, most stimuli do not occur at random. Most perceptible events (including seeing yourself in a mirror when you look in a mirror) follow in an orderly, predictable way from the perceptible events that preceded them. Most events that we percieve _are_ anticipated, a few of them, random events, are not, which is precisely why we often _can’t_ react quickly enough to them. And no, you don’t see the ball is coming before it is coming (although you may well anticipate that it will if say, you are a fielder and are paying attention to the game), but you see where it is going to be when it is coming, well before it gets there, and that prediction/projection is what enables you to catch it. The finite speed of light is no impediment.
> 
> You want citations that vision is anticipatory, do you? Have at it:
> 
> Aloimonos, Y. (Ed.). (1993). Active Perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
> 
> Ballard, D.H. (1991). Animate Vision, Artificial Intelligence, 48, 57-86.
> 
> Blake, A., & Yuille, A. (Eds.). (1992). Active Vision. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
> 
> Bressler, S.L., Tang, W., Sylvester, C.M., Shulman, G.L., & Corbetta, M. (2008). Top-Down Control of Human Visual Cortex by Frontal and Parietal Cortex in Anticipatory Visual Spatial Attention. Journal of Neuroscience (28 #40) 10056-10061.
> 
> Castelhano, M.S., Mack, M.L., & Henderson, J.M. (2009). Viewing Task Influences Eye Movement Control During Active Scene Perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3):6, 1-15: [http://journalofvision.org/9/3/6/](http://journalofvision.org/9/3/6/)
> 
> Findlay, J.M. & Gilchrist, I.D. (2003). Active Vision: The Psychology of Looking and Seeing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
> 
> Hayhoe, M. (2000). Vision Using Routines: A Functional Account of Vision. Visual Cognition (7) 43-64.
> 
> Kveraga, K., Ghuman, A.S., & Bar M. (2007). Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain. Brain and Cognition, 65(#2) 145-168. Online: [Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain - PMC](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2099308/)
> 
> Land M.F. & McLeod P. (2000). From eye movements to actions: How batsmen hit the ball. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1340-1345.
> 
> Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., & Pavel, M. (Eds.). (1996). Exploratory Vision: The Active Eye. New York: Springer-Verlag.
> 
> Li, W., Piëch, V., & Gilbert, C.D. (2004). Perceptual Learning and Top-down Influences in Primary Visual Cortex, Nature Neuroscience, 7 #6, 651-657.
> 
> Liu, T., Larsson, J., & Carrasco, M. (2007). Feature-based attention modulates orientation-selective responses in human visual cortex. Neuron, 55, 313-323.
> 
> Munneke, J., Heslenfeld, D.J., & Theeuwes, J. (2008). Directing Attention to a Location in Space Results in Retinotopic Activation in Primary Visual Cortex. Brain Research (1222) 184-191.
> 
> Neisser, U. (1976). Cognition and Reality. San Francisco: Freeman.
> 
> Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
> 
> O’Regan, J.K. & Noë A. (2001). A Sensorimotor Account of Vision and Visual Consciousness, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 939-1031. (Online: [http://nivea.psycho.univ-paris5.fr/OREGAN-NOE-BBS/ORegan;Noe.BBS.pdf](http://nivea.psycho.univ-paris5.fr/OREGAN-NOE-BBS/ORegan;Noe.BBS.pdf))
> 
> O’Regan J.K. Myin E. Noe A. (2005.) Skill, corporality and alerting capacity in an account of sensory consciousness. Progress in Brain Research (150) 55-68.
> 
> Thomas, N.J.T. (1999). Are Theories of Imagery Theories of Imagination? An Active Perception Approach to Conscious Mental Content. Cognitive Science, 23, (1999) 207-245: [http://www.imagery-imagination.com/im-im/im-im.htm](http://www.imagery-imagination.com/im-im/im-im.htm)
> 
> Roelfsema, P.R., Lamme, V.A.F., & Spekreijse H. (2000). The Implementation of Visual Routines. Vision Research (40) 1385–1411.
> 
> Rothkopf, C.A., Ballard, D.H., & Hayhoe, M.H. (2007). Task and Context Determine Where You Look. Journal of Vision (7 #14:16) 1-20. Online, open access publication: [http://journalofvision.org/7/14/16/](http://journalofvision.org/7/14/16/)
> 
> Sirotin, Y.B. & Das, A. (2009). Anticipatory Haemodynamic Signals in Sensory Cortex Not Predicted by Local Neuronal Activity. Nature (457 #7228) 475-479.

It’s funny, I had already gone to one of these cites because my brain was anticipating this exact post 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Autolycus](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/22d042/32.png) [@Autolycus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Autolycus)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 9:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/24 "2011-10-10T09:08:50Z")

</div>

Truly that was a cite of legend.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Heracles](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/heracles/32/487_2.png) [@Heracles](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Heracles)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 10:21am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/25 "2011-10-10T10:21:36Z")

</div>

[An interesting, recent SciAm blog entry on time perception](http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/09/15/time-on-the-brain-how-you-are-always-living-in-the-past-and-other-quirks-of-perception/). Look for the phrase “particularly sneaky experiment” down the page.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bldysabba](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ecccb3/32.png) [@bldysabba](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bldysabba)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 11:22am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/26 "2011-10-10T11:22:52Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> You want citations that vision is anticipatory, do you? Have at it:

Best response to a demand for a cite. Ever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 12:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/27 "2011-10-10T12:33:18Z")

</div>

> [@Heracles](#):
>
> [An interesting, recent SciAm blog entry on time perception](http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/2011/09/15/time-on-the-brain-how-you-are-always-living-in-the-past-and-other-quirks-of-perception/). Look for the phrase “particularly sneaky experiment” down the page.

Yes, interesting, although, as so often with science journalism, the headline directly contradicts the content of the article.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 12:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/28 "2011-10-10T12:48:49Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> Incidentally, if perception _were_ a one way flow if visual information starting from the perceived object and flowing into some center of experience in the brain, then the delay would be _much_ greater than that arising from the time that light takes to travel from your mirror to your eyes. It would be more on the order of several tenths of a second, rather than nanoseconds. The speed that electrochemical impulses travel down the optic nerve, and through all the other neurons that would presumably have to be involved, the speed of information transmission (via diffusing chemicals) across the synapses between neurons, and the speed at which the receptors in the retina convert incoming light into electrochemical nerve impulses, are all _very, very_ much slower than the speed of light. To repeat, you would never be able to catch a ball, or do anything else that requires even moderately fast reaction to external events, unless perception were mostly anticipatory rather than merely reactive.

Which also would mean that the image in the mirror we perceive is not the image that the light is sending to our eyes, but a construct of the mind of what we expect to see. It would seem as new information is brought in it is added (and noticed), or sometimes discarded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![yelimS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/y/54ee81/32.png) [@yelimS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/yelimS)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 12:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/29 "2011-10-10T12:57:35Z")

</div>

> [@bldysabba](#):
>
> Best response to a demand for a cite. Ever.

He saw the demand coming!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [October 10, 2011, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/30 "2011-10-10T13:22:15Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> Which also would mean that the image in the mirror we perceive is not the image that the light is sending to our eyes, but a construct of the mind of what we expect to see. It would seem as new information is brought in it is added (and noticed), or sometimes discarded.

Yes, that is, sort of, what I have been trying to say, although I think there are potential pitfalls in putting it that way too. It would be a mistake to infer from that sort of formulation (as some people sometimes do) that we do not experience the real world, or that we live in some sort of imaginary construct only tenuously connected to reality. The new information that you mention, is, after all, coming in in great quantities all the time, and not very much of it is outright discarded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [October 11, 2011, 10:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/31 "2011-10-11T22:19:26Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> Yes, that is, sort of, what I have been trying to say, although I think there are potential pitfalls in putting it that way too. It would be a mistake to infer from that sort of formulation (as some people sometimes do) that we do not experience the real world, or that we live in some sort of imaginary construct only tenuously connected to reality. The new information that you mention, is, after all, coming in in great quantities all the time, and not very much of it is outright discarded.

A recent show on National Geo channel called Braingames seems to stand in contrast to your claim that not very much is discarded, according to what they show most information seems to be discarded and we experience a very small subset of reality, or even predicted reality. It also challenges your statement of the pitfall, as this show seems to support that is exactly what is happening - at least as I viewed it.

In this show then mentioned one of the reason that drivers often don’t see motorcycles (and have accidents with them), is because their brain is not expecting them so the person doesn’t see them. To demonstrate this point they have dancers on the stage and have you count the number of times the dancers enter the circle on the stage, after the dance is over they ask you if you saw the 6 ft penguin walk across the stage, 50% of the people didn’t see the 6 ft penguin (neither did I), upon rewinding the DVR there was the penguin.

They also when into when senses conflict such as sight and sound, how sensory input that does not agree is sometimes discarded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2011, 1:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/32 "2011-10-12T01:01:33Z")

</div>

Well yes, perhaps I spoke carelessly in saying that not much is discarded. My point, however, is that the predictions are under constant check, so we do not (under normal circumstances) just see what we imagine ought to be there. That is rather different from the fact that we sometimes (more often than we may realize, indeed) miss things that really are there, because we did not expect and anticipate them.

My point though, was that we are not living in a made-up world, because if we make up something and it isn’t there we normally very quickly discover that. However, just because the world we experience is the real one, it does not follow that we always know everything about it, not even all the things that we could, potentially, discover through our unaided senses.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![njtt](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/ecd19e/32.png) [@njtt](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/njtt)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2011, 3:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/33 "2011-10-12T03:03:29Z")

</div>

Let me try that again. The point that I have been, rather ineptly, trying to make in my last couple of posts is that it is a mistake to think that the facts about the predictive aspects of perception, and indeed the facts about perceptual mistakes and illusions, imply that what one “really” experiences is some sort of (sometimes inadequate or distorted) representation of the real world that has its existence inside the head. That is the Cartesian error, which is also the fundamental misconception behind the OP: the notion that the ‘real me’ is something living inside my head, experiencing only the show that is put on for it inside my brain. On the contrary, we are entire organisms, and we experience the real world that is around us. The brain’s job, in perception, is to direct the gathering of information (in accordance with our needs, and with what we have learned to expect to find), not to assemble and present a digest of that information (accurate or otherwise) to some ‘self’ that lives inside. That is not inconsistent with the fact that we sometimes fail to notice certain things about the world around us, or even with the fact that we sometimes misinterpret what we do see.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![kanicbird](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/5f8ce5/32.png) [@kanicbird](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/kanicbird)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2011, 11:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/34 "2011-10-12T11:19:48Z")

</div>

> [@njtt](#):
>
> Let me try that again. … That is not inconsistent with the fact that we sometimes fail to notice certain things about the world around us, or even with the fact that we sometimes misinterpret what we do see.

The mind is a sensory processing organ, and there is a time lag of some sort and there is some compensating methods to deal with this lag. Does the mind back fill information? (which I think it does), when it processes something that it ‘decided’ you should notice, it not only will bring it into your subset of reality, but place the memory that it was always there and you saw it right away, even though you didn’t.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [October 12, 2011, 1:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/35 "2011-10-12T13:50:42Z")

</div>

> [@kanicbird](#):
>
> The mind is a sensory processing organ, and there is a time lag of some sort and there is some compensating methods to deal with this lag. Does the mind back fill information? (which I think it does), when it processes something that it ‘decided’ you should notice, it not only will bring it into your subset of reality, but place the memory that it was always there and you saw it right away, even though you didn’t.

The Last Thursdayism of the mind.

Yes, I believe it does, and this has been established by tricky bait and switch experiments where something changes, but the mind of the experimental subject attributes the new value to one of the old stimuli, or something like that. I don’t have a citation though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Leo\_Bloom](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/leo_bloom/32/10377_2.png) [@Leo\_Bloom](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Leo_Bloom)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2011, 2:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/36 "2011-10-24T02:05:53Z")

</div>

Dudes, I wasn’t particularly interested in the cognitive situations; there are, I understand, optimized sensory/brain channels for human face recognition (hence agnosia). I presume that is discussed in the mega-cite above.

My question is on what biological, cellular, or atomic events will have occurred in the transit times. **Njtt** has given me what it is not in the visual apparatus. (I still wouldn’t mind knowing the cellular transaction times.)

What I really wanted, I guess, in the “I am not I,” is the velocity of th fastest transaction in the human body during that light transit time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cmyk](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cmyk/32/3353_2.png) [@cmyk](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cmyk)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2011, 5:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/37 "2011-10-24T05:48:07Z")

</div>

From what I can tell online, the folding/unfolding of certain [peptides](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peptide) (built of amino acids, which then go on to form various proteins) takes ~30 ns. How much of this is going on in all of your trillions of cells at any given 30 ns interval is beyond me!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2011, 2:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/38 "2011-10-24T14:57:00Z")

</div>

> [@Darth\_Panda](#):
>
> Or just slow light.

So would that be light lite?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Cartooniverse](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cartooniverse/32/3084_2.png) [@Cartooniverse](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Cartooniverse)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2011, 8:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/39 "2011-10-24T20:29:58Z")

</div>

> [@Darth\_Panda](#):
>
> Or just slow light.

Which would logically require [Slow Glass](http://baencd.thefifthimperium.com/13-TheBestofJimBaensUniverseCD/TheBestofJimBaensUniverseCD/Vol%201%20Num%201/1932093001__17.htm).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chefguy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chefguy/32/138_2.png) [@Chefguy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chefguy)\
**Post date:** [October 24, 2011, 9:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757/40 "2011-10-24T21:28:58Z")

</div>

> [@Cartooniverse](#):
>
> Which would logically require [Slow Glass](http://baencd.thefifthimperium.com/13-TheBestofJimBaensUniverseCD/TheBestofJimBaensUniverseCD/Vol%201%20Num%201/1932093001__17.htm).

Which is no reflection upon the user.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-am-not-i-the-fastest-biochemical-event-and-the-speed-of-light-or-the-bathroom-mirror-phenomenon/598757.md?page=3)
