No, that’d be methane production, which, although possibly valuable, would be a different story.
Here is a new story with quotes from NASA.
You can put anything in a blender, add water and turn it into a ‘liquid’.
Is he a Breatharian?
There was a thread somewhere under the hampster cage about putting odd things in a blender…
Well hey, most of the stuff I eat has no nutritional value. That counts, right?
Anybody else betting that there’s a lot of milkshakes and vitamin smoothies in this “liquid and sunlight” diet? Or better yet, beer. Hey , wait a tick, that’s not such a bad idea…
No, but if you can hold your breath under water for a year, you should be able to do it for ten years.
There comes a point where you’ve simply proven that you can do something indefinitely.Vilhjalmur Stefansson ate only meat for a year and remained in good health; I think it’s reasonable to assume that he’d been able to go on for another year or another decade. In the same way, if you’ve lived on liquids for a year (and as CRorex points out, that may not be too impressive) and are not unhealthy, then I’d expect you to be able to continue.
Priceguy - I apologise for the unwarranted sarcasm. I’m still not sure that your argument holds for liquid-survival.
Anyway, your point is well taken.
Tarantula, apology accepted.
IIRC, people can survive for much longer without food than they can without water - I have a vague feeling (i.e. no cite) that the record for surviving on water alone is something like 180 days. (On the other hand, without water, you’d be lucky to last a week.)
Of course, the operative word there is surviving - at a guess, anyone on a space mission for NASA is going to be required to do rather more taxing things than just survive …
From the link:
And talks out of his ass.
What a bunch of shit.
Even if NASA did investigate him, which a previous link indicates it won’t, it’s an easy run from “I can live off the energy of the sun” to “Boy, it’s a lot colder here in the US than it is in India, hey fellas? Pass the peas.”