# I don’t grok the Newsom dislike among engaged Democrats

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [October 19, 2026, 9:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980 "2026-10-19T21:35:18Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2026, 10:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/161 "2026-10-22T22:30:42Z")

</div>

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Russia’s propaganda is in favor of the corporatists.

Russia’s propaganda doesn’t take sides; it’s about convincing everyone that nothing matters, everyone is equally bad, lying to you all the time, and cannot be trusted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![LSLGuy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lslguy/32/5813_2.png) [@LSLGuy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/LSLGuy)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2026, 10:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/162 "2026-10-22T22:48:03Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> The _base_ Estate tax exception was a mere $675,000 back in 2001- plus extra for a personal residence, etc.

No one with any meaningful wealth ever paid estate taxes no matter waht the base bracket or rate was. Only people who don’t know how to hire decent lawyers pay estate taxes. And that’s been true for a century.

There have always been ways to completely legally bypass estate taxes on the great bulk of real wealth.

Now could those legal ways be choked off with different laws? In theory yes. In practice, just like @Tamerlane said about progressives, that’s so far from the current Overton window that it’s silly to talk about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [October 22, 2026, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/163 "2026-10-22T22:55:21Z")

</div>

> [@Calder](#):
>
> I think “vibes” is one of the few things you can get from a candidate even if you have only seen them speak for 30 seconds. So even less engaged voters will have a vibe.

I’m not sure that voters across America who are less engaged can likely remember ever hearing Newsom speak.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 12:07am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/164 "2026-10-23T00:07:04Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Drake](#):
>
> You have moved the goalposts by adding the restrictive phrase “of LGBT+ laws.” His mixed record on LGBT+ issues involved more than legislation, as has been demonstrated in the discussion upthread.

Yeah, what people are complaining about is one single podcast, where Newsom trolled Kirk. But too many people took Newsom’s comments out of context, which is why he issued a clarification saying more or less just says it is an issue that many people are concerned over, and you can not just ignore their concern. He has signed laws protecting trans atheletes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kron](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/kron/32/12444_2.png) [@Kron](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kron)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 12:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/165 "2026-10-23T00:31:26Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> > [@Chronos](#):
> >
> > Russia’s propaganda is in favor of the corporatists.
> 
> Russia’s propaganda doesn’t take sides; it’s about convincing everyone that nothing matters, everyone is equally bad, lying to you all the time, and cannot be trusted.

At this point I’m beginning to think their propaganda is aimed at convincing people that anybody who disagrees with them has been “swayed by propaganda,” rather than having used their brain-meat to come up with an opinion on their own.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 12:55am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/166 "2026-10-23T00:55:01Z")

</div>

> [@Kron](#):
>
> At this point I’m beginning to think their propaganda is aimed at convincing people that anybody who disagrees with them has been “swayed by propaganda,” rather than having used their brain-meat to come up with an opinion on their own

> **[Firehose of falsehood](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firehose_of_falsehood)**
>
> The firehose of falsehood, also known as firehosing, is a propaganda technique in which a large number of messages are broadcast rapidly, repetitively, and continuously over multiple channels (like news and social media) without regard for truth or consistency. The firehose of falsehood is a contemporary model for Russian propaganda under Russian President Vladimir Putin. Though similar in some ways, the American tactic of "flooding the zone" with misleading or false statements is distinct from ...

_When leaders employ a firehose of falsehoods, citizens retreat into cynicism and the belief that the truth is fundamentally unknowable. If the truth is unknowable, reasoned debate is pointless because there are no agreed-upon facts. … When reasoned democratic discourse is not possible because there are no agreed upon facts, all that is left is the political exercise of raw power._

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/167 "2026-10-23T01:03:48Z")

</div>

So based on this, the belief that anyone who opposes a particular candidate is doing so because they were fooled by propaganda is itself falling victim to the propaganda by allowing oneself to reject the legitimacy of those beliefs as genuine democratic discourse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/168 "2026-10-23T01:08:30Z")

</div>

> [@DeadTreasSecretaries](#):
>
> So based on this, the belief that anyone who opposes a particular candidate is doing so because they were fooled by propaganda is itself falling victim to the propaganda by allowing oneself to reject the legitimacy of those beliefs as genuine democratic discourse

Sure, and if I see someone who thinks that anyone who opposed a particular candidate is doing so because they were fooled by propaganda, I’ll make sure to tell them that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/169 "2026-10-23T01:10:38Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> Newsom has a real chance at winning and a message that could actually make life better for many people. So if you’re an accelerationist extremist on either the left or right flank, that’s just about the worst thing possible for you. That’s where the Newsom hate comes from - people like that and the people they successfully manage to misinform.

apparently i need to add some of my own words or discourse doesn’t let you post

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/170 "2026-10-23T01:12:46Z")

</div>

right - the opposition to Newsom comes from both people fooled by propaganda and people who legitimately disagree with him because they are accelerationists who dislike the capitalist, liberal status quo.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/171 "2026-10-23T01:13:57Z")

</div>

The “fooled by propaganda” part would be the part you didn’t bold - the people they managed to misinform.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:14am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/172 "2026-10-23T01:14:54Z")

</div>

In other words, there are multiple reasons to oppose Newsom, so it would be untrue to say that I said that anyone who opposed him is fooled by propaganda 🙂

Also, in that quote, I’m talking about people who _hate_ Newsom, not anyone who _opposes_ him in any way.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:16am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/173 "2026-10-23T01:16:52Z")

</div>

The reasons being that you were fooled by propaganda or that you are the propagandist who doesn’t express honest grievances.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/174 "2026-10-23T01:18:13Z")

</div>

> [@DeadTreasSecretaries](#):
>
> The reasons being that you were fooled by propaganda or that you are the propagandist who doesn’t express honest grievances

No, the reasons being that you were fooled by propaganda or that you legitimately disagree on whether America should remain a liberal and capitalist nation and so oppose someone like Newsom who supports that. An Illiberal who opposes a liberal politician is indeed expressing an honest grievance, in a manner of speaking.

And again, these were the reasons someone would _hate_ Newsom, not the reasons someone would _prefer a different candidate_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DeadTreasSecretaries](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/deadtreassecretaries/32/4817_2.png) [@DeadTreasSecretaries](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DeadTreasSecretaries)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/175 "2026-10-23T01:28:26Z")

</div>

I think if someone expresses that they truly don’t want capitalism or America or whatever to collapse, want the Democrats to get back in power and also is strongly critical (or hates?) Newsom, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are either lying about those beliefs or have been fooled by propagandists who have the American way of life but have made up lies about Newsom.

I think Newsom gets hate primarily because he comes across as extremely unrelatable and lacking in moral compass. Some of this is a product of the “vibes” he gives off the first time you see him speak irrespective of whether someone is trying to push a narrative about him. Some of it is due to scandals like the French Laundry.

It’s fine to disagree and think actually the hate does come from lies and propaganda, but it’s tough to both think that and decry how propagandists have degraded American democracy just by allowing suspicion and cynicism supersede willingness to seriously engage with political discourse.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/176 "2026-10-23T01:30:45Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> what people are complaining about is one single podcast, where Newsom…

I provided several links upthread, including a few about other issues. It’s not just this podcast.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Chronos](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/chronos/32/134_2.png) [@Chronos](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Chronos)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/177 "2026-10-23T01:35:04Z")

</div>

Besides which, “he only hates trans people when he’s trolling people who hate trans people” isn’t really a very strong argument in his favor.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Babale](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/babale/32/15666_2.png) [@Babale](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Babale)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/178 "2026-10-23T01:38:17Z")

</div>

> [@DeadTreasSecretaries](#):
>
> I think if someone expresses that they truly don’t want capitalism or America or whatever to collapse, want the Democrats to get back in power and also is strongly critical (or hates?) Newsom, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they are either lying about those beliefs or have been fooled by propagandists who have the American way of life but have made up lies about Newsom.

I fully admit that it is possible if there is a Newsom hater out there who is pro-liberalism and pro-capitalism, who does not believe any of the misinformation we’ve seen debunked in this thread about Newsom, but who dislikes him anyways. So far, I haven’t run into one, but I’m willing to keep an open mind as to their existence.

> [@DeadTreasSecretaries](#):
>
> I think Newsom gets hate primarily because he comes across as extremely unrelatable and lacking in moral compass. Some of this is a product of the “vibes” he gives off the first time you see him speak irrespective of whether someone is trying to push a narrative about him. Some of it is due to scandals like the French Laundry.

Yes, I agree that there’s a lot of people who get bad vibes from Newsom, and that much of that comes from Republican manufactured scandals like the French Laundry thing.

> [@Chronos](#):
>
> Besides which, “he only hates trans people when he’s trolling people who hate trans people” isn’t really a very strong argument in his favor

Which would be relevant if he expressed any hatred towards trans people whatsoever, which he most certainly did not, on the podcast with Kirk or at any other time.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParallelLines](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/parallellines/32/3575_2.png) [@ParallelLines](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParallelLines)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 1:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/179 "2026-10-23T01:58:29Z")

</div>

**Moderating:**

I’m going to ask both @Babale and @DeadTreasSecretaries to dial their _clash of opinions_ back a whole lot. There’s been quite a few pointed “I think people who say this are [low level insult]”, and equally general “I’m sure some people who say this are fine, but otherwise they’re [insult]”.

And that other posters are themselves dishonest.

Let’s come back to discussing specifics, and not make broad generalizations that can be taken as criticisms of those posting in the thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Drake](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ad7895/32.png) [@Dr.Drake](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Drake)\
**Post date:** [October 23, 2026, 2:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980/180 "2026-10-23T02:04:53Z")

</div>

> [@Babale](#):
>
> if he expressed any hatred towards trans people whatsoever

Again, this is moving the goalposts. It’s not about hatred. It’s about accepting trans people socially as the gender they say they are, without (1) insisting that they are “really” the sex they were assigned at (or, sometimes, shortly after) birth and (2) insisting that they are potentially a threat to “real” women, including women’s spaces.

The whole discussion of trans women in women’s sports is a clunky vehicle for implying men are trying to take over a women’s domain, which is indeed a problem if they are in fact men in women’s guise. If, on the other hand, they are women, it is the most appropriate place for them. I don’t think this is the thread to get into the biological complexities of sex and its relation to gender, but suffice it to say that any view which holds out that trans women are either not women, or not sufficiently women, isn’t really LGBT±friendly.

I acknowledge that the LGBT+ community itself has some strong anti-trans segments.

[Gavin Newsom explains the surprising reason he just vetoed a pro-trans bill - LGBTQ Nation](https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2026/09/gavin-newsom-explains-the-surprising-reason-he-just-vetoed-a-pro-trans-bill/) is a comparatively recent article on Newsom’s various positions on trans issues, and his legislative record thereon.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980.md?page=8)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-don-t-grok-the-newsom-dislike-among-engaged-democrats/1033980.md?page=10)
