# I don't understand what voters Trump could've picked up between 2016 and 2020

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722>\
**Category:** Politics & Elections\
**Created:** [November 4, 2020, 8:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722 "2020-11-04T08:30:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 18

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 7:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/341 "2020-11-17T19:48:02Z")

</div>

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> Did Sinclair Broadcasting support Hillary in the last election?

No.

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> Why do you think these people voted for her if they only watch Fox news?

Huh, that’s not even related to what I said.

But, to the point, yes, Sinclair has grown, substantially in size and in reach, owning more stations, where they can control what the local news says, what they report, even give them scripts that they must read verbatim, as well as channels upon which they can add their bias.

> **[Sinclair’s takeover of local news, in one striking map](https://www.vox.com/2018/4/6/17202824/sinclair-tribune-map)**
>
> The pro-Trump media company is about to become bigger.

When you turn on your 6 o’clock news, you are expecting to have local news presented to you by local anchors and journalists. You are not expecting partisan slant. So, when that partisan slant appears, even the more cynical among us will not necessarily notice it.

This is further exacerbated by social media. People share stories, some of them even true but still biased, that further drive them towards radicalization.

> [@DemonTree](#):
>
> There are plenty of towns and cities that have already lost their major industrial employer, and some of them must be in areas run by Democrats. Have they tried retraining the people put out of work en masse, and how did it go?

Actually, [looking at it,](https://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2019/12/02/american-cities-that-went-from-rich-to-poor/40662605/) it seems that most of them have been run by Republicans.

In any case, a small town doesn’t have the resources to retrain their populace, that is something that really needs resources from at least the state, and preferably the federal government.

Usually what happens with these towns is that they lose their primary economic driver, lots of people go on unemployment and welfare. They do their best to scrape by, they usually have a substantial uptick in drug abuse, domestic violence, and crime. The kids that can make it out do so, and leave, and these little places are left to rot, their populations and their economies dwindling.

Since you seem to think that giving them other options is a bad thing, what are your suggestions for these towns? Do we just lie to them and tell them that we will get that plant to reopen and give them back their jobs, or do we find a way to give them the resources to explore other options?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![k9bfriender](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/k9bfriender/32/3283_2.png) [@k9bfriender](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/k9bfriender)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 8:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/342 "2020-11-17T20:13:07Z")

</div>

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> Don’t our intelligence agencies combat radicalism (Islam, et al) by employing bright, educated, and trained operatives to understand the language in which the radical propaganda is couched, and then to add contradictory messaging using that same language, particularly in online forums ?

Do they? I’ll take your word for it.

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> It’s knowable (if frightening) where Trump supporters are getting their information. It’s equally knowable what language is used on those sources (ie, simplistic, reductive, inflammatory, hyperbolic, etc.).

How do we insert that information into their stream? Do we send people undercover to work at Fox and Sinclair?

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> Policy wonks shouldn’t be scripting the messaging of the Democrats. PsyOps types should.

It usually is not the wonks, but the PR people who script the message. The problem is is that the wonks are the ones who are running things on the Dem side, and the PR people are running things on the Republican side.

It’s all well and good to have your advertising influenced by your PR people, but when your policy is being dictated by the PR people, you’ve already lost the fight before you even started.

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> And … if we’re explaining, we’re losing. If we’re defending, we’re losing. If we’re constantly in fact-checking mode, we’re losing.

Yes, we are losing _them_. We are losing people who don’t want to understand things, who only look to attack, who believe and tell lies.

If we are outnumbered by those sorts of people, we have already lost. Becoming those sorts of people will only put us on the winning side, it won’t let us win on any of the things that we currently consider to be important.

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> The Trump supporters are effectively speaking Portuguese, and Democrats seem to think that continuing in English

No, Portuguese is still a language. It’s not that they are just speaking a different language, they are speaking gibberish. You can still relate cause and effect in Portuguese, math still works in Portuguese.

A much more apt analogy is reasoning with toddlers. You know how to reason with a toddler? Answer is you can’t. You can bribe them or punish them, that’s about all the communication that they are capable of understanding. Other than that, you have to wait until they grow up.

Republicans have gotten really good at offering that candy to the hyperactive 2 year old that is screaming in the middle of the grocery store. They know it won’t quiet them down, but they also know that it will keep them from ever growing up to understand that the vegetable isle is _not_ a punishment.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 8:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/343 "2020-11-17T20:49:39Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> Huh, that’s not even related to what I said.
> 
> But, to the point, yes, Sinclair has grown, substantially in size and in reach, owning more stations, where they can control what the local news says, what they report, even give them scripts that they must read verbatim, as well as channels upon which they can add their bias.

What I meant was, how could they have voted for Hilary last time if they are in such a media bubble? But sounds like the echo chamber may be got… echoier in the meantime.

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> Since you seem to think that giving them other options is a bad thing, what are your suggestions for these towns? Do we just lie to them and tell them that we will get that plant to reopen and give them back their jobs, or do we find a way to give them the resources to explore other options?

I don’t think it’s a bad thing. It would make much more sense to start by testing retraining schemes on people who have already lost their jobs. And it would be a lot more attractive to the oil workers if the Democrats could point to areas where it worked and have testimonials from people it helped. Otherwise why should they believe it’ll work, or even happen?

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> In any case, a small town doesn’t have the resources to retrain their populace, that is something that really needs resources from at least the state, and preferably the federal government.

Yes, I was thinking state level. One of the states could try creating a program to retrain people, to see how well it works and what works best. Not everything has to be done by the federal government.

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> How do we insert that information into their stream? Do we send people undercover to work at Fox and Sinclair?

Articles to be shared on social media, YouTube videos, WhatsApp Memes… easy.

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> The Trump supporters are effectively speaking Portuguese

Apt choice, since Brazil elected a President who’s just like a less orange version of Trump. Latin Americans love populists even more than US Americans. The Dems just need their own version of Lula in order to compete.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![carrps](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carrps/32/2957_2.png) [@carrps](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/carrps)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 9:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/344 "2020-11-17T21:04:11Z")

</div>

Lula? He’s been out of office for over 10 years. Bolsonaro is the Trump clone.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DemonTree](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/demontree/32/8646_2.png) [@DemonTree](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DemonTree)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 9:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/345 "2020-11-17T21:16:48Z")

</div>

Yes, but he was running against Bolsonaro and polling way ahead until they put him in jail. Maybe the Dems need to fight fire with fire, or populism with populism…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 9:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/346 "2020-11-17T21:24:21Z")

</div>

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> > [@DavidNRockies](#):
> >
> > Don’t our intelligence agencies combat radicalism (Islam, et al) by employing bright, educated, and trained operatives to understand the language in which the radical propaganda is couched, and then to add contradictory messaging using that same language, particularly in online forums ?
> 
> Do they? I’ll take your word for it.

Two sections (as a starting point, if you’re interested): ‘counter-messaging’ and ‘engagement:’

> **[download](https://bipartisanpolicy.org/download/?file=%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2019%2F03%2FBPC-_Online-Radicalization-Report.pdf)**

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> How do we insert that information into their stream? Do we send people undercover to work at Fox and Sinclair?

Manafort shared internal polling data with the Russians – data that, IIRC, was used to buy micro-targeted ads on platforms like Facebook.

In the most critical swing states.

And didn’t they spend like … nothing to do it ?

This was, paradoxically, high-tech guerrilla warfare.

Go where the propaganda lives. Fight back.

To the rest of your reply … I think you and I generally agree far more than we disagree, but …

There are a few here who **sound** like they’re preaching appeasement, but I don’t think they are. I think they’re preaching a smarter approach that’s bound to result in more effective messaging.

I think they’re advocating for finding a lingua franca and using it.

I think the issue of ‘Portuguese’ vs. raising small children is a bit of hair-splitting, because …

If the arguments from the other side are as reductive, inflammatory, simplistic, and lacking in substance as I imply – citing that ‘socialism’ meme I posted – then you really do have to meet your audience where they live.

That doesn’t mean that the Democrats stop providing policy position papers to their PR folk for messaging and start creating FB memes comparable, but antithetical, to the ‘socialism’ meme above.

It’s additive. It’s incremental. It’s what _else_ they need to be doing that – AFAICT – they aren’t doing (well) now.

They need to counter narratives if they want to chip into the (vaster than I’d care to believe) audience who speaks such a rudimentary language of clicks and grunts.

I think Biden beat the worst president in US history, but not by much.

Knowing that 72+ million Americans still support the CFSG means it’s time to revisit strategy … definitely before '24, and hopefully before '22.

And I think **nothing can be off the table**.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/347 "2020-11-17T21:51:54Z")

</div>

> [@Wesley\_Clark](#):
>
> I’m not sure. Trump getting ten million more votes is deeply screwed up. its basically cemented that half of America is totally deranged.

Exactly. The election result isn’t something to celebrate. It’s alarming.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/348 "2020-11-17T21:55:56Z")

</div>

That part’s alarming. But Biden winning even though so many Americans are driven by some combination of delusion and vitriolic hatred is a good thing. If someone had told us, in advance, that there were at least 10 million Americans who didn’t vote for Trump in '16 but did this time, then there’s no way we would have had any confidence that Biden would win.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Velocity](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/velocity/32/18006_2.png) [@Velocity](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Velocity)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 10:08pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/349 "2020-11-17T22:08:08Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> That part’s alarming. But Biden winning even though so many Americans are driven by some combination of delusion and vitriolic hatred is a good thing. If someone had told us, in advance, that there were at least 10 million Americans who didn’t vote for Trump in '16 but did this time, then there’s no way we would have had any confidence that Biden would win.

I guess we have different ideas of what is encouraging. You were a former submarine nuclear engineering officer, right? I’m sure there must be some sort of a nuclear analogy where the hazard, even if contained, would still lead to a serious inquiry. That’s the kind of attitude the Democrats should be having, not “we avoided a Chernobyl by a margin of 3 percent, so it’s all good.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [November 17, 2020, 11:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/350 "2020-11-17T23:23:31Z")

</div>

Where did I ever say “it’s all good”? It’s not. It’s very bad. But in this very bad circumstance, we still won. We should build on the successes and seek to learn from the failures. And since we won the presidency, we should do our best to enact good policy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Acsenray](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/acsenray/32/4519_2.png) [@Acsenray](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Acsenray)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 5:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/351 "2020-11-20T17:30:36Z")

</div>

The Guardian covers Trump’s increase in popularity in Iowa

> **[‘He made a connection’: how did Trump manage to boost his support among rural...](https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/20/trump-made-a-connection-here-rural-supporters-iowa)**
>
> Despite overall defeat, Trump boosted his support in the Iowa heartland and some say sounded the death knell for the ‘country club Republican’ party

> “I do believe this Trump moment is long. He’s changed politics. It’s kind of like Ronald Reagan but this has become more of a movement. Nobody was hanging Reagan flags,” he said.

> … But Trump increasingly won over voters in the heartland as he cast his objections to the wearing of masks and the closing of businesses to enforce social distancing as matters of personal independence and economic survival.

…

> Leading Democrats denounced the violence but hedged on wider issues of police reform which, seen from rural Iowa, gave weight to Republican claims that radicals would wield power in a Biden presidency.

> But long before that Trump solidified at least some of his support after an outpouring of anger from some liberals who blamed Clinton’s loss on prejudiced white voters in rural America.

> “People felt slighted by them calling us racist hicks and talking about the backwards midwest out in the sticks,” said Schlecht.  
> …

> “I know he says those things and it’s wrong,” said a businesswoman who twice voted for Obama and then took a chance on Trump because she thought he would be good for the economy. “I wish he would stop tweeting. But it’s not enough to stop me voting for him again. If anything, I feel more alienated from the Democrats over the past year. They’ve gone off the reservation. I don’t recognise them any more.”

…

> Trump, on the other hand, has successfully portrayed himself to many midwestern voters as listening to their concerns and acting on them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tingbudong](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tingbudong/32/520_2.png) [@tingbudong](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tingbudong)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 5:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/352 "2020-11-20T17:35:13Z")

</div>

> [@Acsenray](#):
>
> They’ve gone off the reservation. I don’t recognise them any more.”

Well, that statement pretty much flags her racism right there.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DesertDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/desertdog/32/11503_2.png) [@DesertDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DesertDog)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 6:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/353 "2020-11-20T18:35:16Z")

</div>

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> The Trump supporters are effectively speaking Portuguese, and Democrats seem to think that continuing in English

> [@k9bfriender](#):
>
> No, Portuguese is still a language. It’s not that they are just speaking a different language, they are speaking gibberish.

It is [speaking in tongues.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFH1QlgV_Vc&feature=youtu.be&t=89)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 8:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/354 "2020-11-20T20:14:59Z")

</div>

> [@DavidNRockies](#):
>
> I could spend hours telling my beloved family member everything that’s wrong with this meme, and then explaining to her the quantitative ways in which the countries where **Democratic Socialism** rules the roost … are markedly better than the US.

Could you list a few of these? And bear in mind that Democratic Socialism is not Social Democracy, so the European states do not count. Not a single one, including the Nordic countries, are run by Democratic Socialists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 8:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/355 "2020-11-20T20:22:32Z")

</div>

Looks like the root of your question is semantic.

I’m more than okay using the term “social democracy” instead of “democratic socialism” if it’s more accurate.

I’ll just invite you to browse, for example, this site to understand our rankings against other countries:

[https://www.nationmaster.com/](https://www.nationmaster.com/)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 10:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/356 "2020-11-20T22:12:04Z")

</div>

There is a huge difference between social democracy and democratic socialism. It’s like the difference between conservatism and fascism. If I said there were lots of successful fascist countries, and when pressed for an example I mentioned Brazil or Britain, you’d think I was being incoherent.

To repeat: Democratic Socialists are hard socialists who believe in bringing down capitalism and replacing it with worker-controlled industry, somehow. Social Democrats are capitalists who just want a slightly bigger percentage of the profits of capitalism to be redistributed to the needy without breaking the capitalist system.

Which one are you supporting? And which model do you think the Democratic Socialists of America want to achieve?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DavidNRockies](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/davidnrockies/32/6279_2.png) [@DavidNRockies](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DavidNRockies)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 10:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/357 "2020-11-20T22:14:33Z")

</div>

I’m referring to social democracies. I was using the wrong term.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sam\_Stone](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ecccb3/32.png) [@Sam\_Stone](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sam_Stone)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 10:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/358 "2020-11-20T22:32:23Z")

</div>

Well, that may be the disconnect with your family. For example, the meme of the people on the boat was NOT directed at social democracies. No one is trying to escape Sweden by boat. The countries that are being referenced by that meme are places like Cuba, Venezuela, the old Societ Union, China, and Vietnam before it liberalized.

This is a serious messaging problem Democrats have. Within their ranks are maybe 10-20% hard socialists who think the Venezuela/Cuba model is fine if only the right people tried it. The rest of the Democrats want to downplay this for obviius reasons (it’s batahit crazy and electoral poison), so they claim that they just want a better safety net. So you wind ip with a lot of people talking past each other and refusing tomaccept what the other side clearly believes, and it adds incoherence to party strategy and allows their political rivals to use whichever interpretation is the most politically damaging.

But Democrata won’t come out with full-throated denunciations of real Socialism, because the shell game they play keeps the ‘base’ activated while not completely turning off the moderates who are okay with Social Democracy but not full-on socialism or Communism.

The Republicans have the same problem with their base.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 11:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/359 "2020-11-20T23:15:04Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> This is a serious messaging problem Democrats have. Within their ranks are maybe 10-20% hard socialists who think the Venezuela/Cuba model is fine if only the right people tried it.

Cite for that 10-20% figure? AFAICT it doesn’t seem to square with the tiny number of Democratic elected officials and activists who are actually advocating policies realistically comparable to those of Venezuela and Cuba.

Now, if you’re just using the phrase “think the Venezuela/Cuba model is fine” as a loose paraphrase for “are willing to vote for something that bears the ‘socialism’ label as long as they agree with its general substance”, then your estimate is massively lowballed. People who fall in that category in fact comprise [76% of Democrats, not to mention 45% of Independents and even 17% of Republicans](https://www.newsweek.com/76-percent-democrats-say-theyd-vote-socialist-president-new-poll-shows-1486732).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kimstu](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/ecd19e/32.png) [@Kimstu](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kimstu)\
**Post date:** [November 20, 2020, 11:19pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722/360 "2020-11-20T23:19:45Z")

</div>

> [@Sam\_Stone](#):
>
> Democratic Socialists are hard socialists who believe in bringing down capitalism and replacing it with worker-controlled industry, somehow. Social Democrats are capitalists who just want a slightly bigger percentage of the profits of capitalism to be redistributed to the needy without breaking the capitalist system.

That’s a rather arbitrary, and artificially disjoint, classification scheme that doesn’t take into account the reality of the many people who might self-identify with one of those two labels, while actually desiring a system that falls somewhere in the very broad middle between the definitions you’ve chosen to give for them.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722.md?page=17)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-dont-understand-what-voters-trump-couldve-picked-up-between-2016-and-2020/924722.md?page=19)
