# I have a coworker who uses 'literally' incorrectly

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-a-coworker-who-uses-literally-incorrectly/755834>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [May 27, 2016, 5:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-a-coworker-who-uses-literally-incorrectly/755834 "2016-05-27T17:46:31Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 201

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Riemann](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/riemann/32/3133_2.png) [@Riemann](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Riemann)\
**Post date:** [June 3, 2016, 8:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-a-coworker-who-uses-literally-incorrectly/755834/201 "2016-06-03T20:44:03Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> To quote a wise doper:

> [@I swiftly herewith consign to the pit, the ignorant clowns who misconstrue "its"](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-swiftly-herewith-consign-to-the-pit-the-ignorant-clowns-who-misconstrue-its/627871/205):
>
> For what it’s worth, using “literally” as a generic intensifier really makes my blood boil, too. It’s truly a plague on the English language. I know I’m really laid-back on usage peeves in general, but this one actually drives me insane. In fact, it’s quite soul-crushing.

You realize that this is parody, right? And skilful parody. It squeezes in **five** precisely analogous constructions to intensify metaphors within in the peeve.

**really** makes my blood boil [but not really]  
**truly** a plague [but not truly]  
**really** laid-back [but not really]  
**actually** drives me insane [but not actually]  
**In fact** , it’s quite soul-crushing. [but that’s not a fact]

Another giveaway is the tongue-in-cheek

> [@](#):
>
> I’m really laid-back on usage peeves in general, but…

which is a parody of similar constructions such as  
I’m not a racist, but…  
I generally support LGBT rights, but…

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-a-coworker-who-uses-literally-incorrectly/755834)._
