# I have been warned

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [November 15, 2009, 10:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694 "2009-11-15T22:18:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 16\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Liberal](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/848f3c/32.png) [@Liberal](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Liberal)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 1:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/41 "2009-11-18T01:11:09Z")

</div>

> [@Gfactor](#):
>
> Lib,
> 
> I don’t have a problem with discussing whatever you want to discuss, but I think you’ve mischaracterized what Mr. D said:
> 
> Which suggests a more lenient standard for posters in atmb.
> 
> It was you who raised the other issue:

God, you’re right. :smack:

My sincerest apologies to Mr Dibble.

> [@](#):
>
> Not that it’s a big deal or anything.

I quess it would be appropriate if I opened a separate thread about the topic.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tumbleddown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e9bcb4/32.png) [@tumbleddown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tumbleddown)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 1:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/42 "2009-11-18T01:19:27Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> My interpretation of the rule is that it would not be a violation.

Thank you!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crypto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b3f665/32.png) [@crypto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crypto)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 3:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/43 "2009-11-18T03:24:13Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> My interpretation of the rule is that it would not be a violation.

How can this be? In the example outlined, it is clearly the intent of the poster that the person is being ignored, which, as \*\*Dex \*\*stated

> [@](#):
>
> The mods pretty much agree that naming who is in your Ignore List is pretty much an insult, no matter how you cut it. I’ve never heard of, “I love what he says about politics, so I’ve put him on my ignore list.”

So, you can say “I’m ignoring you” is fine, and you can put that person on your ignore list (or not). But to say “You are on my ignore list” is a violation.

Can you say “I won’t see your reply unless someone quotes it”? This doesn’t state that the person is on your ignore list, just like the now approved “I’m ignoring you”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 3:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/44 "2009-11-18T03:42:25Z")

</div>

> [@Stink Fish Pot](#):
>
> How can this be? In the example outlined, it is clearly the intent of the poster that the person is being ignored

The rule only applies to the ignore list.

> [@](#):
>
> So, you can say “I’m ignoring you” is fine, and you can put that person on your ignore list (or not). But to say “You are on my ignore list” is a violation.

Correct.

> [@](#):
>
> Can you say “I won’t see your reply unless someone quotes it”? This doesn’t state that the person is on your ignore list, just like the now approved “I’m ignoring you”.

No. That clearly indicates someone is on your Ignore List.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crypto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b3f665/32.png) [@crypto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crypto)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 4:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/45 "2009-11-18T04:06:08Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> My interpretation of the rule is that it would not be a violation.

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> The rule only applies to the ignore list.

[Quote=stink fish pot]

So, you can say “I’m ignoring you” is fine, and you can put that person on your ignore list (or not). But to say “You are on my ignore list” is a violation.  
[/quote]

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Correct.

[Quote=stink fish pot]

Can you say “I won’t see your reply unless someone quotes it”? This doesn’t state that the person is on your ignore list, just like the now approved “I’m ignoring you”.  
[/quote]

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> No. That clearly indicates someone is on your Ignore List.

This is the dumbest rule I’ve seen debated in a long time.

Seriously, I can insult a poster on this board, in the BBQ pit, with impunity. But anywhere else, it’s an insult that would make that same person crumble.

thanks for clearing this up. :rolleyes:

Oh, and sorry for the difficulty in reading my posting… for some reason, I can’t quote the whole damn posting anymore with nested quotes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 4:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/46 "2009-11-18T04:18:44Z")

</div>

> [@Stink Fish Pot](#):
>
> thanks for clearing this up.

You’re welcome.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crypto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b3f665/32.png) [@crypto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crypto)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 4:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/47 "2009-11-18T04:26:45Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> You’re welcome.

It’s your world, boss.

I look forward to following the guidelines in this thread.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 4:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/48 "2009-11-18T04:29:22Z")

</div>

> [@Stink Fish Pot](#):
>
> I look forward to following the guidelines in this thread.

Glad to hear it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![crypto](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/b3f665/32.png) [@crypto](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/crypto)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 4:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/49 "2009-11-18T04:44:54Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> Glad to hear it.

I’m glad you are glad. Really, I am.

Now, I’m done replying in this thread to you. I’m ignoring you. However, that doesn’t mean I am putting you on my ignore list. That would be insulting. That also doesn’t mean that I’m not putting you on my ignore list. It doesn’t really matter, based on the information in this thread.

This really works!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 4:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/50 "2009-11-18T04:51:31Z")

</div>

> [@Stink Fish Pot](#):
>
> This really works!

That was easy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 11:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/51 "2009-11-18T23:04:46Z")

</div>

This whole thing about a visible count of warnings is news to me, and I don’t see any such marks on anybody’s posts. Am I correct in assuming you can only see your own warning hash marks?

Apparently, I am an unmarked pussy. I did call someone in MPSIMS an asshole once – I can only assume the Mods accepted it as a statement of fact rather than an insult.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 11:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/52 "2009-11-18T23:09:01Z")

</div>

> [@Boyo\_Jim](#):
>
> This whole thing about a visible count of warnings is news to me, and I don’t see any such marks on anybody’s posts. Am I correct in assuming you can only see your own warning hash marks?

Correct.

> [@](#):
>
> Apparently, I am an unmarked pussy.

Well . . .um . . . nah.

> [@](#):
>
> I did call someone in MPSIMS an asshole once – I can only assume the Mods accepted it as a statement of fact rather than an insult.

Or nobody reported it. It’s also possible you got warnings before we started using the infraction system, or that you got a mod note.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Gfactor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/9de053/32.png) [@Gfactor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Gfactor)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 11:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/53 "2009-11-18T23:39:39Z")

</div>

**Boyo Jim** : Here is a link to the thread where we discussed implementing the infraction system: [Warnings/Infractions - Comments, Please - About This Message Board - Straight Dope Message Board](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=519082)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [November 18, 2009, 11:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/54 "2009-11-18T23:51:32Z")

</div>

> [@Gfactor](#):
>
> …Or nobody reported it…

There’s a good chance everyone else in the thread agreed with me. Possibly even the poster I insulted, er, described. 😛

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Muffin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/muffin/32/4341_2.png) [@Muffin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Muffin)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2009, 1:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/55 "2009-11-19T01:08:33Z")

</div>

You know, the SDMB could make warnings a profit centre if the mods were restricted to rescinding warnings, and the authority to give warnings was held by the highest bidders.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Boyo\_Jim](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/87869e/32.png) [@Boyo\_Jim](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Boyo_Jim)\
**Post date:** [November 19, 2009, 2:09am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694/56 "2009-11-19T02:09:27Z")

</div>

Hey, I kind of like the idea of being able to buy a banning, or even a more democratic system --‘vote someone off the island’, as it were.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-have-been-warned/517694.md?page=2)
