Some nice pictures here so far. I like the cloudy ones.
Here is what we got in Monument Valley AZ. We were fortunate in that we only had to step outside of our hotel to see it.
It was spectacular!
Much more betterer ! Thanks.
Yours was ok ! I was replying to twoflower (who has now sorted it).
Cheers
No Horsemen, but there is a weird shimmering effect at around 99%, due to slight refraction of light from patches of different temperatures in the atmosphere. Actually, it happens all the time, but with a light source half a degree across, all the shimmers are blurred away to nothing. But when the Sun is reduced to a thin sliver, you get a one-dimensional pinhole effect, and you can see the shimmers.
For this one, I didn’t think annular was enough to justify travel, but I figured I’d at least step outside a little after noon to see the C-is-for-Cookie Sun. Except that the weather on Saturday was being particularly Cleveland, full overcast, wet, and miserable.
Great pictures everyone!! Here at central cal coast the morning downslope breeze pushed the fog back so good viewing. I usually just enjoy “natures pinhole cams” but tried some eclipse glasses.
What really amazed me, is after taking away all the blinding rays that you usually face when dealing/ glancing/existing with the sun, its really quite a small little ball…at least visually!
SE Georgia, here: totally overcast, just like the one in 2017(?) when I lived on the other side of the St. Marys River. I swear, TPTB in Florida have gone the Mr. Burns route and figured out to block it out unless we pay to see it. 
BTW, Bullitt, really nice pix! 
Good viewing in Roswell yesterday on a nice cool day. Not much other reason to visit if you’re not into alien kitsch. But I did get some cheap used books.
Someone mentioned nature’s pinholes and I saw a terrific photo of leaf shadows posted. You can also make a pinhole with crisscrossed fingers. We were casting shadows in each other’s chest just to try it out.
The SIGO and I took a short drive to the Valles Caldera yesterday, and watched the first part of the eclispe. Clear skies, cool weather, just a perfect day for it.
I was surprised at just how bright daytime still was, but how the temperature seemed to drop by 10 degrees.
Tripler
. . . then again, I was outside for an hour in shorts.
Glad to hear it. I was originally planning to go to Roswell or Corona, NM myself, but then the forecast had some clouds, so I decided not to take the chance (and, as I previously noted, Odessa, TX was perfectly clear).
I am out of El Paso, for reference.
Somehow in this context Valles Caldera sounds like a place on the Moon.
Kinda tough to get to, and you’d be a little too close to the eclipse to get good pix of it. But maybe you could get some pix of Earth with a big shadow on it. 
Seriously, the pix you posted are fantastic.
Coincidentally, about the same apparent size as the moon!
SunWife and I were in Hobbs, NM for the event. It was our first time trying an equatorial mount with our older solar scope, which worked OK except that our camera adapter couldn’t quite get the focus right when we set it up. Pictures went well - the scope even picked up a couple of prominences - and we got a good (if irregularly-timed) time-lapse of the entire event, save for some of the end when the camera battery ran out of energy and we had to do a quick recharge to get a little more of the tail end.
Weather in Hobbs turned out well - there were a few high, wispy clouds to the northwest but nothing near the eclipse. Max occultation was over four and half minutes long, long enough that we experienced the temperature drop that some others mentioned. I also noted that despite there being something like only 5% of the visible light of the sun reaching us, our eyes adjusted fairly well and we didn’t really notice that things were exceptionally darker than usual - probably thanks to the long duration of dimming.
All in all, well worth the trip and we picked up some ideas to make the April total eclipse even better for observing.
But it is a striking coincidence, right? The sun is 400 times larger and 400 times further away. I’m not aware of any hypothesis that even an approximately similar apparent size might be correlated with the presence of life, for example. Although if this universe is inside an alien teenager’s game console they might have selected “perfect solar eclipse” as one of the simulation parameters.
Perfect plus or minus a few percent. And depending on the epoch. But it is a cool coincidence.
But the moon is moving farther away, at the rate of nearly 4 cm per year. Eventually* its apparent size will be too small to cause a total eclipse. Meanwhile it’s robbing the earth of rotational energy, making our days longer. The whole thing pisses me off!
* For certain values of “eventually”
Hence my comment about the epoch. Got a good million years yet until they’re all annular eclipses at best. But it is coming whether you or I prefer that or not.
Or even more, Mars.
Of course from the Moon or from Mars you could get a pic like this one. You’d just need a really, really, good telephoto lens.
Next time I’m at Starbase 1, I’ll get some pictures of Earth, and’ll try to get it over San Francisco. 
Seconded, @Bullitt !
Tripler
"I am just another redshirt, on Starbase Zero-One . . . "
Unless the rate increases, the moon will be 40 kilometers further away a million years from now, so we’ll still have total eclipses long after that.
Not that it matters to me of course. If I’m around the observing site it’ll be cloudy or rainy, obviously.