Gee, you’ve spent a tremendous amount of time thinking about this. I wonder why.
I don’t know why you’re confused. Please look at the description of this forum:
That means GQ is not for open-ended questions or political debates.
Open view means the officer wasn’t in a constitutionally protected area when he saw the item. Plain view means he was.
Open view still requires an officer to get a warrant. Plain view does not.
If you’re in a public street and see heroin inside a house, that’s open view. You still need to get a warrant to go inside the house and seize the heroin.
If you’re in the house because you have a valid search warrant to look for guns, and you see heroin, that’s plain view. You can seize the herion without the warrant
Thanks!

The search warrants for Scott Peterson remain sealed to this day. No one knows why, but the suspicion is that the MPD lied to get them and, if so, the whole case may collapse.
[Sidebar, yer Honor!]
Are all warrants sealed, or are they usually open and public knowledge? I mean, if my neighbors get searched some random Super Tuesday, can I go into public records two months later and find out why (i.e. do I have to do a FOIA request–or the local/state equivalent)?
I’m curious to see how warrants are worded–how strict or ‘loose’ they are.
[/Sidebar]
Tripler
. . . at least, that’s what my counsel recommends I start researching.