Huh. When I say that you’re offering a much more nuanced argument, I mean that you went from saying,
[with the implied DO spend a lot of time “ordering the pyramid of oppression”]
to
It’s not at all a problem that you’ve moderated the initial response that I called bullshit on. It’s good. That’s how discussion works: you thought more about what you said, and presumably realized that your initial answer was a bit flip and inaccurate, and gave a better answer.
I’m not going to call that “moving the goalposts.”
When I said that I’d never seen progressives spending a lot of time ordering the pyramid of oppression, I was responding to a glib claim. When you started making a more nuanced claim, about how leftists sometimes get too far up their asses about whose identity allows criticism of what, I asked for evidence of what you were talking about that wouldn’t require me to watch multiple videos. And that’s moving the goalposts?
No. That’s me trying to understand what you’re talking about and not wanting to watch a bunch of videos to understand it.
In this thread, you’ve offered the kind of evidence that we can talk about much more easily. And you’ve disavowed the “pyramid of oppression” language. Again, that’s good. Asking folks to make less glib claims, and to offer textual evidence, is not moving the goalposts.