I pit my future King.

The BBQ Pit
41

[QUOTE=Really Not All That Bright]

I do appreciate your suggestion and your earnest desire to help me find the making of myself, and I promise to give your advice all the attention it deserves.
[/QUOTE]

If you think that my opinion of your personality is totally and completely wrong then you have nothing whatsoever to lose by trying out my suggestion have you?

Because your good friend/family member will of course on oath say that you are NOT a smug,self congratulatory,self deluding nonentity ,so you will have the double pleasure of knowing that you really are a very likeable person and that I am totally in error.

You’ll be able to tell the world that not only am I not a very nice person but that I’m a not very nice person who’s a poor judge of character as well.

But I somehow think that your not going to try too hard to ask anyone that question.

42

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]
You’ll be able to tell the world that not only am I not a very nice person but that I’m a not very nice person who’s a poor judge of character as well.
[/QUOTE]

Perish the thought. You are obviously a remarkably perceptive individual, determining, as you did, that I’m “overwhelmingly smug and up my own arse” from a 14-word post.

43

Have I harmed you in a previous life?

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]
Oh so this is edition number three,four or whatever of “The main thrust” of your pitting is it?,the subject of your pitting seems to change each time the wind blows,it seems holding and sticking to a strong position in a debate is not naturally in your character.
Are you just easily led or a total coward?
[/QUOTE]
No it’s exactly the same as my original post. Read it again.

Having read back over the thread it seems your insanity began after reading this post:

[QUOTE=Petrobey]

[QUOTE=Jackmannii]

Prince Charlie is the Once And Future Moron.
[/QUOTE]

Oh, yes. And while I’m happy to chat GM, this was the main thrust of my pit.

Anyone got a spare guillotine?
[/QUOTE]

I have two theories. Either you’ve misread this as me saying the main thrust of my pit is a wish to guillotine Charlie, or the mere mention of guillotining Charlie sends you into such a tizz that you lose all basic brain function.

If the former, then you need to look at the post again. If the latter, then I apologise that you find my joke tasteless. I don’t really want to kill the man.

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]
That apart
I have no interest in your racist opinions,if you so dislike people with skin colours different to your own then why dont you fuck off and emigrate to Mars.
[/QUOTE]
You what? I was responding to your baseless suggestion that I might not be British. I think, in fact I know, that this is the first time I’ve ever been called racist. Odd feeling. Oh, and I have left the country, if it makes you feel better. But I’ll be back . . .

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]
Is there ANY level of stupidity that you wont descend to with your childish attention seeking antics?

Because at the moment there doesn’t seem to be.
[/QUOTE]
You probably want to ask yourself who’s flying off the handle here before calling people childish.

Seriously, does anyone know if Lust4Life is normally like this? I thought maybe his first post was drunken one. But either he only posts drunk or I’ve hit a button somewhere.

44

No when I’m drunk I’m a nice person.

If any button was hit it was yet another person going for the easy target.

Charlie had to put up with some serious shit as a result of the lies put about by the evil bitch he was first married to.

And her coven of gullible supporters have spread so much filth about him and Camilla since then that it genuinlly makes me very angry.

There used to be some of these posting on the AOL Monarchy board who I honestly think were deranged .

Apart from personal abuse about his and Camillas looks,dress sense,personal hygiene and cruelty(I kid you not)he was accused of being Gay,a serial adulterer(Yes I know,I did say they didn’t seem entirely sane)that he was a fraudster,a coward, had the mother of his children murdered and shouldn’t really be in this country because really he was a German and wasn’t fit to be king,that the Princes weren’t his children and that he was insane.

After Dis death many people had jumped on the "lets abuse Charlie and Cam"bandwagon (Including many kids)for the same reasons that mobs lynch people,so that they dont stand apart from everyone else.
Philip got much the same and the Queen Mum was accused of being an alcoholic ,gambling addict and a Nazi.

And they all had to bite their lips and not reply.

45

Um… old jug-ears was an adulterer. Is it really a huge stretch to suggest he might have been a serial adulterer?

46

Well I’m beginning to understand why you put “Perfidious Albion” as your location!

Look, I’ve got nothing against Prince Charles personally, and actually some affection, which I think I tried to convey in my original post.

But in an attempt to create a role for himself he is butting in on areas of which he has little understanding. As others have said, if he puts his head above the parapet on an issue then he must be prepared for people to take pot shots.

You have a very strong opinion on the man. Any connection to him . . .

Sir?

:bows and runs:

47

Lust4Life - must you always be such a wanker?

48

[QUOTE=Illuminatiprimus]
Lust4Life - must you always be such a wanker?
[/QUOTE]

My god is that it?

Is that the best you can come up with after sitting there fumiing for a few days?
I can’t honestly say that I actually feel insulted by such an incredibly weak retort.

In fact I feel more insulted that such a mental pygmy as yourself hasn’t even got the nous to come up with something halfway decent in the abuse department.
What esteem sapping verbal assaults have I got to look forward to in the future?

“Why dont you Flip[ offL4L you nasty man you ,you stupid head”
I can hardly type for my shaking hands when I think about how soundly you have put me in my place.

What are you going to now?

Slide off for a few hours of intense self abuse now that you’ve actually received a reply from me?
Well if its made your lonely little life a bit more bearable then I can live with it,but for chrissake if you’re going to have another go at me at least try and put a little more thought in to it,maybe even a little imagination?

Or failing that try and get somebody a trifle more intelligent then yourself to make up the insults for you.

I am of course assuming ,probablywrongly,that you do actually have someone who can be loosely construed as a friend or failing that an aquaintance with an intellect that is above moron level.

But I’m not holding my breath.
Will come back to Petro as I have to work for a moment or three.

49

[QUOTE=Petrobey Mavromihalis]

You have a very strong opinion on the man. Any connection to him . . .

Sir?

:bows and runs:
[/QUOTE]

Definitely not sir,I’ve more then half a brain and I’ve always worked for a living.
I’ve met Charlie a couple of times whilst working and think that he’s a pretty decent bloke though personally I disagree with him on a couple of things,Organic Ffarming being one of them.
I like the fact that he did the British Army Parachute course when he didn’t have to,has scuba dived under the Arctic Ice cap,was a Naval officer for five years,suffered heavy bullying at Gordonstoun without protesting and has suffered painful injuries from horse riding without whining.

50

Actually I’ve changed my mind. It’s all been said.

51

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]
My god is that it?

Is that the best you can come up with after sitting there fumiing for a few days?
[/QUOTE]
Why have I been sitting here fuming? I only just read through this thread and noticed, as per usual, you acting like a twat. Hence my comment.

I say it like I sees it, L4L.

52

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]

Charlie had to put up with some serious shit as a result of the lies put about by the evil bitch he was first married to.

And her coven of gullible supporters have spread so much filth about him and Camilla since then that it genuinlly makes me very angry.

There used to be some of these posting on the AOL Monarchy board who I honestly think were deranged .

Apart from personal abuse about his and Camillas looks,dress sense,personal hygiene and cruelty(I kid you not)he was accused of being Gay,a serial adulterer(Yes I know,I did say they didn’t seem entirely sane)that he was a fraudster,a coward, had the mother of his children murdered and shouldn’t really be in this country because really he was a German and wasn’t fit to be king,that the Princes weren’t his children and that he was insane.

After Dis death many people had jumped on the "lets abuse Charlie and Cam"bandwagon (Including many kids)for the same reasons that mobs lynch people,so that they dont stand apart from everyone else.

Philip got much the same and the Queen Mum was accused of being an alcoholic ,gambling addict and a Nazi.

And they all had to bite their lips and not reply.
[/QUOTE]

Goodness. Do you really believe all you hear on the Internet?

Prince Charles committed adultery with Camilla before, during and after his marriage to Diana.
He believes in homeopathy.
And he makes unsupported statements about GM food with no evidence.

He is also a multi-millionaire by inheritance, has enormous influence with people who like Royals and titles and stands both to inherit the Throne of England and become the Head of the Church of England.
He has a full-time staff of PR people, plus servants to run his bath and put toothpaste on his toothbrush.

P.S. Like the rest of the Royal family, there is indeed some German ancestry. Greek too. (I don’t think this matters at all, but you seem to think it’s all lies.)
Plus the Queen Mother was indeed a gambling addict.

These are the facts - never mind the spurious rubbish you quote above.

53

[QUOTE=Steve MB]
And apparently also an ignoramus, who thinks that uranium can exponentially reproduce itself the way living things do. Perhaps the term “breeder reactor” confused him.
[/QUOTE]

Uh…what? Perrow didn’t say this, nor did I. He did say (correctly) that chain reactions, like reproducing GMOs, can increase geometrically and thus are inherently harder to control and tend to have more effect than human planners are usually prepared for.

Sailboat

54

[QUOTE=Death of Rats]
Your own link tells a different story. Want to retry your fearmongering?
[/QUOTE]

You’re talking about the fact that the CDC decided the illnesses weren’t linked to Starlink? OK, true that. That’s what I get for skimming.

The rest of my “fearmongering” was aimed not at the dangers of Starlink but at the failure of the agribusiness system to keep its promise. The big-money guys, KNOWING that all they had to do to make unlimited amounts of more money in the immediate future was to follow through on their promise to keep Starlink out of the human food supply, and KNOWING that everyone was watching, nevertheless immediately broke down and willfully sold Starlink into the human food supply for the difference in price between human-grade corn and feed corn. I don’t know what that price difference was but it can’t have been much.

Sailboat

55

[QUOTE=friedo]
Conurbations? Well, at least he’s getting some good use out of the Royal Thesaurus.
[/QUOTE]

Actually, I believe that “conurbation” is a pretty standard British term, nothing you’d need a thesaurus to know.

(I am not a Brit, so I’m just going on my experience with my English relatives.)

ETA: I should have read through the entire thread, then I’d know this has already been said.

Never mind!

56

[QUOTE=Illuminatiprimus]
Why have I been sitting here fuming? I only just read through this thread and noticed, as per usual, you acting like a twat. Hence my comment.

I say it like I sees it, L4L.
[/QUOTE]

Is that one of your recurring fantasies Illuminatus ?
That you’re a Roughy toughy,straight talking,"calls a spade a spade"Indiana Jones type character?
Ah well we all have our little dreams,sorry me old mucker but if I were you I’d start concentrating my mind on the reality of your situation rather then pretending to yourself what you’d like to be.

I wouldn’t be stunned with amazement if you were the spotty boy with the greasy hair who always got bullied at school.

Am I right?
No you don’t have to answer,I think that we can all guess what it is.

But Ireally shouldn’t be messing with someone who judging by their name is going to be one of the New World Order and a leader at that!

Anytime now I could have some of your underlings goose stepping around to my house to give me a sound thrashing or maybe pour petrol through my letterbox and then ignite it.
Ooooooh,Ooooh Quiver,Quiver!

Save me from the tough guy who says it like it is!

For gods sake if your that desperate for attention try ringing Samaritans and give the Human Race a rest.

57

[QUOTE=glee]

Prince Charles committed adultery with Camilla before, during and after his marriage to Diana.
He believes in homeopathy.
And he makes unsupported statements about GM food with no evidence.

He is also a multi-millionaire by inheritance, has enormous influence with people who like Royals and titles and stands both to inherit the Throne of England and become the Head of the Church of England.
.

P.S. Like the rest of the Royal family, there is indeed some German ancestry. Greek too. (I don’t think this matters at all, but you seem to think it’s all lies.)
Plus the Queen Mother was indeed a gambling addict.

These are the facts - never mind the spurious rubbish you quote above.
[/QUOTE]

Ah yes,good old Glee the one who hated the Royals originally because Charlie did Saint Diana wrong except that when it came out that she was in fact a rather nasty piece of work as a human being (and even you couldn’t deny it )then all of a sudden you hated them because they were in your eyes overpriveleged.
This from the man,using the term in its loosest possible sense,who has spent his entire adult life teaching the children of wealthy parents(who to the unelightened would appear to be rather overpriveleged themselves)such useful things as how to play Bridge and other necessary life skills.
And this while the state education has been begging for more teachers.
Well to this working class boy dragged up on a sink estate that you are one of the biggest hypocrites on this earth since Diana complained about Charlie reverting to his first and only true love after she had tried to shag her way through just about every adult male,married or not,who she had had regular contact with including journos,professional sportsmen,businessmen,sloanes,you name it …

Its a wonder she didn’t try to shag her way through the Chelsea Pensioners.
I see that you have tried to distort my post by implying that I dont believe that the Windsors really have German and Greek ancestry,so no change to your tactics there then.
No sorry I know full well about their foreign ancestry(including Danish for Philip aswell)but I dont think that this makes them unfit to be the British Royal Family.

In fact I think that only a gutless,Yellow spined ,closet racist would think that dont you Glee ?

Dont you think that only a slimy little coward who doesn’t really like foreigners but who is too timid to come out with it would think that the Windsors were unfit to be our Heads of State because they are descendants of people who didn’t speak English?

Sorry am I making your ears burn just a little?
Oh and the Queen Mum was a gambling addict was she?

How low are you prepared to stoop?

I’ve had to wipe stuff off of the sole of my shoe thats better then you.

And you have been one of the guiding influences on children for so many years,i find that very disturbing.

58

[QUOTE=Lust4Life]
Ah yes,good old Glee the one who hated the Royals originally because Charlie did Saint Diana wrong except that when it came out that she was in fact a rather nasty piece of work as a human being (and even you couldn’t deny it )then all of a sudden you hated them because they were in your eyes overpriveleged.

This from the man,using the term in its loosest possible sense,who has spent his entire adult life teaching the children of wealthy parents(who to the unelightened would appear to be rather overpriveleged themselves)such useful things as how to play Bridge and other necessary life skills.
And this while the state education has been begging for more teachers.
Well to this working class boy dragged up on a sink estate that you are one of the biggest hypocrites on this earth since Diana complained about Charlie reverting to his first and only true love after she had tried to shag her way through just about every adult male,married or not,who she had had regular contact with including journos,professional sportsmen,businessmen,sloanes,you name it …

Its a wonder she didn’t try to shag her way through the Chelsea Pensioners.
I see that you have tried to distort my post by implying that I dont believe that the Windsors really have German and Greek ancestry,so no change to your tactics there then.
No sorry I know full well about their foreign ancestry(including Danish for Philip aswell)but I dont think that this makes them unfit to be the British Royal Family.

In fact I think that only a gutless,Yellow spined ,closet racist would think that dont you Glee ?

Dont you think that only a slimy little coward who doesn’t really like foreigners but who is too timid to come out with it would think that the Windsors were unfit to be our Heads of State because they are descendants of people who didn’t speak English?

Sorry am I making your ears burn just a little?
Oh and the Queen Mum was a gambling addict was she?

How low are you prepared to stoop?

I’ve had to wipe stuff off of the sole of my shoe thats better then you.

And you have been one of the guiding influences on children for so many years,i find that very disturbing.
[/QUOTE]

Wow. An amazing diatribe, packed full of mistakes. :rolleyes:
Are you sure you’re on the right board? :smack:

  1. I don’t consider Diana a Saint and have never posted anything like that. (Since you consider her 'rather nasty piece of work ', feel free to post evidence.)
  2. I certainly consider most of the Royal family over-privileged. I don’t hate them, but I consider them out of date (e.g. male succession) and would prefer a different Head of State.
  3. I have not spent my entire adult life teaching.
  4. **I don’t teach Bridge ** (though I am a qualified teacher at that too, because unlike you I’m clever :stuck_out_tongue: ).
  5. The ‘state education has been begging for more teachers’ obviously does not apply to me, because of my current specialist subjects. How ignorant are you? :confused:
    P.S. Nevertheless I have taught in the State system, because unlike you I’m competent.
  6. I too started life as working class. The difference is I made something of myself (unlike you). :stuck_out_tongue:
  7. I condemn Diana’s adultery just as much as Charles’. I don’t think either of them are fit to rule.
  8. As for your crass xenophobic smears, I replied to your post “he was accused of (being) a German” by stating that he does indeed have German ancestry. I also stated that “I don’t think this matters at all, but you seem to think it’s all lies.”
    Would you like some lessons in comprehension?
  9. **The Queen Mother left debts of over £7 million - given her annual income was over £500,000 what do you think she spent it on? Shoes?! ** :smack:

I don’t know why your head is so far up Charles’ arse that you can’t present a coherent argument, but I hope you get better soon.

59

[QUOTE=glee]
Wow. An amazing diatribe, packed full of mistakes. :rolleyes:
Are you sure you’re on the right board? :smack:

  1. I don’t consider Diana a Saint and have never posted anything like that. (Since you consider her 'rather nasty piece of work ', feel free to post evidence.)
  2. I certainly consider most of the Royal family over-privileged. I don’t hate them, but I consider them out of date (e.g. male succession) and would prefer a different Head of State.
  3. I have not spent my entire adult life teaching.
  4. **I don’t teach Bridge ** (though I am a qualified teacher at that too, because unlike you I’m clever :stuck_out_tongue: ).
  5. The ‘state education has been begging for more teachers’ obviously does not apply to me, because of my current specialist subjects. How ignorant are you? :confused:
    P.S. Nevertheless I have taught in the State system, because unlike you I’m competent.
  6. I too started life as working class. The difference is I made something of myself (unlike you). :stuck_out_tongue:
  7. I condemn Diana’s adultery just as much as Charles’. I don’t think either of them are fit to rule.
  8. As for your crass xenophobic smears, I replied to your post “he was accused of (being) a German” by stating that he does indeed have German ancestry. I also stated that “I don’t think this matters at all, but you seem to think it’s all lies.”
    Would you like some lessons in comprehension?
  9. **The Queen Mother left debts of over £7 million - given her annual income was over £500,000 what do you think she spent it on? Shoes?! ** :smack:

I don’t know why your head is so far up Charles’ arse that you can’t present a coherent argument, but I hope you get better soon.
[/QUOTE]

Oh dear looks like I touched a raw nerve or two,try kidding yourself me old solitary plumbing specialist because you’re not kidding anyone else.

Now where on Earth could I have got the idea that you taught Bridge to the kids?
…Could it have been you perhaps?

Ah yes I do believe it was.

So either you’re telling Porkies now or you were telling Porkies then.

Not that it makes any difference to your credibility ,you lost that a long time ago,could be even before you became a Doper.

But that of course is merely my wild uninformed guess tee hee he.
Fancy a game of chess?

60

Hmm deafening silence from Glee.

They say liars need good memories .
Are you using this time to check up on what you’ve posted in the past?

A little bit too late for that I’m afraid.

Bye Bye.