Last fall, just before Thanksgiving, I shot my first turkey. It was the most thrilling experience of my life. Sure, it scared a lot of people in the frozen foods section and I’m not allowed in that particular Kroger anymore, but it is a memory I’ll always cherish.
I suppose children raised with bear-baiting are the only ones that would ‘get it’, but thats hardly a sound argument.
looks at post
looks at poster
Why am I not surprised?
Realistically, Babar the Elephant and Tony the Tiger won’t exist without tourism of some sort. Such pests play havoc with crops, not to mention children. Provided the hunters are charged through the nose, I have no problem with them.
I especially like those who love killing big animals, as they will pay more for the privilege.
Then again, if somebody points a firearm in my general direction while I’m on public land, I will turn them in on assault charges.
That’s just bullshit. South African National Parks don’t allow any trophy hunting in their parks, and they’re operating just fine. Hunting isn’t necessary money for a well-run Parks administration, it’s just easy money.
I’ve nothing against game hunting, I love me some kudu steak. But trophy hunting is just barbarism, and really just a facet of Colonialism we should get rid of.
Nooooooooooo! Not the WiFi hotspots!
My friend’s boyfriend’s parents (yeah, I know) were big game hunters. They had gone on many expeditions and had a couple rooms of their house devoted to their trophies. Rooms were decorated to look like African landscapes, complete with murals, stone outcroppings, and vegetation.
In one of the connected bathrooms stood a stuffed baboon, its arms outstretched with fists made save for the index fingers pointing at each other. This was because the baboon held the fresh toilet paper while you sat and did your business.
Just thought I’d share.
Exactly. Photo safaris bring in just as much money. Smaller bucks, but more people. More people are happy, and the animals don’t suffer from being photographed and put on YouTube.
Nobody is actually stupid enough to believe that, are they? Read up on “the tragedy of the commons.”
This is a lie all too often repeated. I’ve given tax returns to the Virginia Nongame Wildlife Fund, and to the Chesapeake Bay Foundation for years, among other less well-known conservation causes.
It would be more correct to say “Hunters are the only conservationists that deliberately minimize the role of other conservationists with false claims.”
And people say hunters don’t have a sense of humour or don’t respect animals. Tsk.
Another interesting aside; the Dutch population is overwehelmingly against hunting. About 95% percent is against it, polls show again and again. So do you think our crown prince, the one who is to be king in five years or so, gets the PR message and stops hunting? Does he open the Royal Hunting Grounds for the public to hike in? No. He invites a couple of captains of industry and off they go shooting deer.
This is a Prince who isn’t terrible popular as it is (his wife is the real star) and he could really use some boost. But no. His grandfather, a famous lout and scoundrel,(and patron of the World Wildlife Fund, was a hunter. So his grandson hunts too. And pisses off 95% of his subjects.
You almost have got to admire the man for being so true to himself. Or his class. Or so thickheaded, I don’t know.
That is awesome.
Than the shooter needs more practice time.:dubious:
In a sport, your opponent has a chance to win. If you give the leopard a gun, it’s a sport.
You’ll be happy to learn that many Texas ranches offer big game hunting of exotic (including rare) African wildlife raised on site.
Why am I not surprised. I hope they at least get the exta-long leashes for them so they have a sporting chance.
Do you do it with a high power rifle from hundreds of yards away, for no other purpose than to see something suffer and die? Or do you do it so you can mount their head on your den wall as a sort of sick trophy to your manhood?
Because, if you do either, then I can answer your question.
I grew up hunting and shooting. What these people are doing is not hunting; it’s trophy shooting at best, and simple blood sport at worst, neither of which I have any respect for. The prime lesson I learned about hunting was: don’t play with your food. This includes shooting animals simply for the trophy or the rush, catch-and-release of fish, etc. If you’re not going to eat it, leave it alone.
I lived in Africa for three years and went on numerous photo safaris during that time. Game parks take in huge revenue from this activity and nothing has to die in the process so that some asshole can have a head on his wall.
Do you have some way of knowing if they feel terror and pain while you’re chasing them down and squashing them?
I’m not asking as a way to gauge your mental health; I really want to know. Maybe if I can communicate to them that there will be CONSEQUENCES to being in my home, they’ll decide to go live somewhere else.
As a vegetarian of a few years (disregarding a few occasions where I’m cajoled into eating meat while staying at a friend’s home, but I never purchase it), there doesn’t seem to be any consistency on any sort of scale in regards to animals whatsoever.
Tucker Carlson says Michael Vick should be executed for running a dog hunting ring, but Vick’s a big scary black guy. Rich white men go to Africa to go create jobs for the po’ starving folk and they’re a part of the conservation movement and if we didn’t grow up on it, we wouldn’t get it.
Honestly, apart from in instances where the extinction of a species is possible, I think any sick and twisted thing a human wants to do with an animal should be permissible (including using them for sexual pleasure). I don’t think anything can come close to overfeeding it, slowly slaughtering it and then trussing its corpse up to eat and that’s something most humans pay to take part in daily.
actually, it was a dog fighting ring. And yeah, I’d have been pleased had he gotten lethal injection.