# I Pit the ID-demanding GOP vote-suppressors (Part 1)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [June 12, 2012, 7:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943 "2012-06-12T19:15:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 170

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MaxTheVool](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/9fc29f/32.png) [@MaxTheVool](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MaxTheVool)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2013, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3381 "2013-09-05T15:31:05Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> People registered and voting twice, in two different jurisdictions, is a problem that doesn’t exist?
> 
> [Here’s an entire page](http://www.bradblog.com/?page_id=4380) devoted to that accusation against Ann Coulter.

Unless I’m mistaken, that page is devoted to the accusation that Coulter voted once, in the wrong district, but in the right state. Which is very very different from voting twice. Heck, the fact that in this entire ridiculous thread there hasn’t been any discussion of people voting twice in two different states is pretty strong circumstantial evidence that it is NOT known or though to be a particular problem.

> [@](#):
>
> As to the “applied equally” – the article doesn’t advance any factual basis to support a conclusion that it was NOT applied equally – does it?
> 
> Are you aware of some other fact, beyond the article’s four corners, that DOES suggest this wasn’t applied equally across all districts?

This measure could easily have a disproportionate impact on one party without being applied unequally across districts, if, demographically, Democratic voters are more likely to have recently moved between states.  
Obviously this isn’t proof of anything. But then, it wouldn’t be. That is, if some evil and clever Republican operative were coming up with ways to suppress Democratic turnout while maintaining plausible deniability, you’d expect to see stuff like this: actions that have no clear motivation, not very well publicized, which are not prima facie obviously illegitimate, but which could easily have disproportionate impact.  
(Which is not to say that I’m at all certain that’s what’s going on in this particular situation. It’s entirely possible that it’s just a generic non-partisan bureaucratic clusterfuck.)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hentor\_the\_Barbarian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hentor_the_Barbarian)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2013, 3:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3382 "2013-09-05T15:31:36Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> People registered and voting twice, in two different jurisdictions, is a problem that doesn’t exist?

In a word, yes, you disingenuous twit. In person voter fraud is a problem that does not exist, as has been repeatedly demonstrated for you.

In the present example, you don’t even have the problem of registering twice, since the person in question was no longer registered to vote in two places.

> [@](#):
>
> As to the “applied equally” – the article doesn’t advance any factual basis to support a conclusion that it was NOT applied equally – does it?
> 
> Are you aware of some other fact, beyond the article’s four corners, that DOES suggest this wasn’t applied equally across all districts?

Is there some problem with making sure that this purge of legitimate voters did not occur only in selected districts? Why would you raise any objection to that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigAppleBucky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigapplebucky/32/178_2.png) [@BigAppleBucky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigAppleBucky)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2013, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3383 "2013-09-05T15:48:35Z")

</div>

As of last fall, my youngest who had registered to vote in another state, was still on the NY voter rolls. She voted once in her new state and not in NY. She was not on the NY rolls this spring so her out of state registration has caught up.

I would say the Virginia thing is a glitch (and just incompetently run) if there is no discrimination in the purging. Were only D’s purged? Also, one wonders whether blue counties got their lists late in order to prevent re-registrations. Halifax was late, but what about Fairfax??

Sounds like it might be due to incompetence, but who knows for sure, especially since it was run county by county.

I’ve warned some folks I know in Virginia about this.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Lurker\_Above](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/dc4da7/32.png) [@The\_Lurker\_Above](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Lurker_Above)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2013, 4:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3384 "2013-09-05T16:14:19Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> As to the “applied equally” – the article doesn’t advance any factual basis to support a conclusion that it was NOT applied equally – does it?
> 
> Are you aware of some other fact, beyond the article’s four corners, that DOES suggest this wasn’t applied equally across all districts?

Wait, are we supposed to have evidence that a problem exists before taking confidence-enhancing steps to stop it?

Surely there exists the possibility that such a voter roll purge could be done improperly. And that the improper purge could possibly even effect voting results! The electorate’s confidence in the outcome will be crushed unless we force anyone who wants to purge registrations [del]provide photo-ID[/del] prove they are doing so properly.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bridget\_Burke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/7cd45c/32.png) [@Bridget\_Burke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bridget_Burke)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2013, 6:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3385 "2013-09-05T18:01:35Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Lurker\_Above](#):
>
> Wait, are we supposed to have evidence that a problem exists before taking confidence-enhancing steps to stop it?
> 
> Surely there exists the possibility that such a voter roll purge could be done improperly. And that the improper purge could possibly even effect voting results! The electorate’s confidence in the outcome will be crushed unless we force anyone who wants to purge registrations [del]provide photo-ID[/del] prove they are doing so properly.

Oh, like the voter purge[Florida did in 2000](http://www.salon.com/2000/12/04/voter_file/)? It didn’t do a lot for _my_ confidence in the results…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CannyDan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cannydan/32/548_2.png) [@CannyDan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CannyDan)\
**Post date:** [September 5, 2013, 6:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3386 "2013-09-05T18:17:20Z")

</div>

> [@Bridget\_Burke](#):
>
> Oh, like the voter purge[Florida did in 2000](http://www.salon.com/2000/12/04/voter_file/)? It didn’t do a lot for _my_ confidence in the results…

Hey, it made _me_ ever so much more confident! _I survived the putsch of 2000!_ Made me stronger, it did.

But then I’m neither black nor a felon.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2013, 3:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3387 "2013-09-06T15:32:29Z")

</div>

So, specifically, what course of action do you seek?

Should the legislature repeal the Voter ID law? Looks like that’s not going to happen.

Should the courts overturn Voter ID, finding it unconstitutional? The Supreme Court has already weighed in.

What, specifically, are you urging should happen?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![elucidator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/8edcca/32.png) [@elucidator](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/elucidator)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2013, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3388 "2013-09-06T16:23:41Z")

</div>

I’m not quite sure I see how voter roll purges and voter ID laws are necessarily connected, except that they pass through the same slime-encrusted hands. Heck, it might even be possible to challenge such purges without even referencing voter ID laws.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CannyDan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cannydan/32/548_2.png) [@CannyDan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CannyDan)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2013, 4:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3389 "2013-09-06T16:40:42Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> So, specifically, what course of action do you seek?
> 
> Should the legislature repeal the Voter ID law? Looks like that’s not going to happen.
> 
> Should the courts overturn Voter ID, finding it unconstitutional? The Supreme Court has already weighed in.
> 
> What, specifically, are you urging should happen?

To your questions above, yes, I think the legislatures _should_ repeal Voter ID OR make a genuine and strenuous effort to facilitate the process of obtaining such ID. Perhaps through an educational campaign plus live and internet “help” facilities and extended days, hours and locations for State offices that issue Voter IDs. Sadly, I must agree that the former isn’t going to happen, at least not given the present political climate. And the later isn’t likely either.

SCOTUS has indeed weighed in and declared these laws constitutional, at least facially. But I remain hopeful that one of two eventualities may occur (which I’ve said before). Perhaps these laws will be seen to have the negative effect some of us fear, and perhaps that situation will cause a re-examination of these laws, and perhaps they will then be struck down as being discriminatory in their effect. Alternatively, perhaps the people who feel themselves the target of these manipulations of the ability to vote may become so pissed off that they’ll move heaven and earth to register (or re-register if needed), obtain IDs or whatever other esoteric ‘qualifications’ may be further required, and vote out of office the proponents of Voter ID.

What I may or may not be doing in my personal life to affect these laws shall remain just that – personal. But as a scribbler on a message board, I urge my readers to urge their representatives to either overturn outright or facilitate compliance with these laws as per my first paragraph above. These attempts should include both “soapbox” and election efforts to change the ‘present political climate’. And I count SDMB posting as “soapbox” efforts.

Having insufficient faith in the possibility of a court finding discriminatory effect and overturning all of the many jurisdictional variations of these laws, I instead put my faith in representative democracy. I believe that efforts to squeeze potential voters, to freeze them out of the process, should backfire and cause all citizens who believe in electoral fairness even when that might not serve a partisan purpose to reinvigorate the process with their input – and their votes. (Or if you don’t accept my characterization, maybe “efforts to solve a virtually nonexistent problem with a ‘solution’ that inconveniences many but fails to treat a potentially much more severe problem, that of fraud in absentee voting, justified only by the desire to assuage “voter uncertainty” at the possibility of an incredibly rare event”.)

I so urge. Is that specific enough?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2013, 4:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3390 "2013-09-06T16:46:18Z")

</div>

> [@CannyDan](#):
>
> I so urge. Is that specific enough?

Absolutely. Thanks!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bricker](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@Bricker](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bricker)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2013, 4:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3391 "2013-09-06T16:49:02Z")

</div>

> [@elucidator](#):
>
> I’m not quite sure I see how voter roll purges and voter ID laws are necessarily connected, except that they pass through the same slime-encrusted hands. Heck, it might even be possible to challenge such purges without even referencing voter ID laws.

True – and for the record, I’m not offering up anything close to a blanket approval of voter purges – there’s just too much variety in the various ways it can be done. I approve in concept the hypothetical purge that is even-handed, based on reasoned inferences about non-eligible voters, and is done with enough time to allow wrongly-purged voters time to correct the error. whether any actual purge effort fits that description, I don’t know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigAppleBucky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigapplebucky/32/178_2.png) [@BigAppleBucky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigAppleBucky)\
**Post date:** [September 6, 2013, 8:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3392 "2013-09-06T20:59:52Z")

</div>

> [@Bridget\_Burke](#):
>
> Oh, like the voter purge[Florida did in 2000](http://www.salon.com/2000/12/04/voter_file/)? It didn’t do a lot for _my_ confidence in the results…

Florida - again.

[http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/florida-gop-and-voter-fraud](http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/florida-gop-and-voter-fraud)  
Sept 5, 2013

**Florida GOP-Led Voter Fraud Investigation Finds Nothing—Except GOP Fraud**

> [@](#):
>
> The investigation, curiously, found nothing on the Florida New Majority, \*(The Democratic group) \*but it did stumble across a little fraud from the Strategic Allied Consultants—a GOP contractor that made the news last year for falsifying registration forms. Earlier this year, two former employees of SAC admitted to law enforcement officials that they did indeed commit voter fraud. Rebekah Joy Paul submitted 20 fake voter registration applications, while Christian Davis Price submitted seven. Both said they were told by the company that they would not get paid unless they submitted a certain quota of applications, and that they were strongly instructed not to register democrats.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![The\_Lurker\_Above](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/dc4da7/32.png) [@The\_Lurker\_Above](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/The_Lurker_Above)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2013, 12:37am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3393 "2013-09-07T00:37:21Z")

</div>

> [@BigAppleBucky](#):
>
> Florida - again.
> 
> [http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/florida-gop-and-voter-fraud](http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/florida-gop-and-voter-fraud)  
> Sept 5, 2013
> 
> **Florida GOP-Led Voter Fraud Investigation Finds Nothing—Except GOP Fraud**

To be fair that’s pretty close to the ‘voter fraud’ that got ACORN in trouble. The guy on the street wanted to get paid and I doubt anyone was going to actually try to vote under the fake registration.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CannyDan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cannydan/32/548_2.png) [@CannyDan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CannyDan)\
**Post date:** [September 7, 2013, 2:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3394 "2013-09-07T02:41:41Z")

</div>

> [@The\_Lurker\_Above](#):
>
> To be fair that’s pretty close to the ‘voter fraud’ that got ACORN in trouble. The guy on the street wanted to get paid and I doubt anyone was going to actually try to vote under the fake registration.

If we’re being fair, where is ACORN today?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2013, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3395 "2013-10-17T20:07:08Z")

</div>

[Voter-roll purge in Virginia.](http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2013/10/17/virginia-election-officials-purging-almost-40000-voters/)

> [@](#):
>
> The Virginia Board of Elections has purged more than 38,000 names from its voter rolls just weeks before Election Day, despite serious concerns from local election administrators that many of those voters are still eligible to cast a ballot.
> 
> The purge comes a few months after the board said it would use several databases to find voters who were now ineligible to vote, either because they had been convicted of a felony or moved out of state. But after the board sent an initial list of voters who would be purged to local election administrators, those administrators found what they said were hundreds of voters who shouldn’t be removed.
> 
> On Oct. 3, the state Democratic Party filed paperwork seeking an injunction to halt the purge. But on Tuesday, the Board of Elections said it had already nixed 38,870 names from voter rolls after county registrars reviewed the initial lists.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rhythmdvl](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/85f322/32.png) [@Rhythmdvl](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rhythmdvl)\
**Post date:** [October 17, 2013, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3396 "2013-10-17T20:21:50Z")

</div>

But I \*feel \*so much more safe and secure and now have utmost respect for the integrity of the voting process!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2013, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3397 "2013-10-25T21:55:10Z")

</div>

[Sometimes,](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=705906) [they slip and let their cards show](http://gawker.com/even-the-daily-show-was-shocked-by-this-racist-gop-lead-1451400551).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2013, 10:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3398 "2013-10-25T22:42:56Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> [Sometimes,](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showthread.php?t=705906) [they slip and let their cards show](http://gawker.com/even-the-daily-show-was-shocked-by-this-racist-gop-lead-1451400551).

And, sometimes, [twice in the same week](http://www.politicususa.com/2013/10/24/texas-ag-admits-minorities-voted-republican-suppress-votes.html).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2013, 11:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3399 "2013-10-25T23:11:40Z")

</div>

> [@Bricker](#):
>
> True – and for the record, I’m not offering up anything close to a blanket approval of voter purges – there’s just too much variety in the various ways it can be done. I approve in concept the hypothetical purge that is even-handed, based on reasoned inferences about non-eligible voters, and is done with enough time to allow wrongly-purged voters time to correct the error. whether any actual purge effort fits that description, I don’t know.

But you’ll support legislating it anyway?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zakalwe](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zakalwe/32/270_2.png) [@Zakalwe](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zakalwe)\
**Post date:** [October 25, 2013, 11:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943/3400 "2013-10-25T23:48:32Z")

</div>

This is what I love about Bricker’s position here:

**Bricker** : We need Voter ID to prevent fraud!!!1!!!  
**Lots of other people** : Do you have ANY evidence fraud is actually occurring? 'Cause we have a bunch that says it’s NOT occurring. You’re solving a problem that doesn’t exist.  
**Bricker** : It’s NECESSARY for CONFIDENCE in the SYSTEM!!!1!!! We need to change things!

Later:  
**Lots of other people** : Hey, here’s some indications that there are major problems with the system you implemented (to solve the problem that didn’t exist).  
**Bricker** : WHERE’S THE EVIDENCE THAT THIS IS A WIDESPREAD PROBLEM!!!1!!! Absent that, we shouldn’t change things.

It’s inconsistent, partisan, and sloppy thinking. Frankly, I expected better from him. Color me an incurable optimist.

As for the emphasis above, I often disagree with Bricker. But I rarely find him engaged in inconsistency or sloppy thinking. This blind spot he has bothers me. Especially since I think that if we lived in the same city, we’d probably get along pretty well as long as we stayed away from politics. I think I’d enjoy having a drink with him.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943.md?page=169)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-pit-the-id-demanding-gop-vote-suppressors-part-1/624943.md?page=171)
