I Pit(y) Orson Scott Card

Impressive deadpanning.

  1. Hamlet
  2. Jerry Maguire
  3. Bite my bird.

9/11.

I think he was always kind of vaguely socially conservative, but as the Secular Humanist tape shows, he was against the kind of crazy conservative agit-prop the OP links to. 9/11 drove him (and a lot of other people) around the bend, and he doesn’t seemed to have ever looked back.

  1. Signs/Forever Young/Patriot/Air America/Braveheart
  2. Fucking anything he’s ever appeared in including Jerry Maguire.
  3. Nah, really, they’re both fucking ineligible for the word actor.

I think Tom Cruise is an excellent actor. Tastes vary, of course, but just because you think he sucks doesn’t mean he actually does.

Just for shits & giggles, let me chuck in a possible reason why Ender’s Game would have been added to the reading list for the USMC and others. The basic premise is that it’s ok to do whatever is required to win a war, whatever the cost, and best to do it at such a remote distance that your key operators are blissfully unaware of the actual impact of their actions. Even better, the rather blatant analogous socialist enemy sends you an apology from the grave saying it was all their fault.

Now normally I’d be wary of viewing any author as being THAT simplistic…and then I read OSC’s “it’s not prejudiced, gays can marry people of opposite gender just like straights” and realise that really he’s a fucking idiot.

Interview with a Vampire: Tom Cruise is a soulless recluse who lurks in the darkness and sucks the life from all who come near him. He’s also in this movie about a vampire. (1994)

ETA: very vague spoilers for the Ender’s series follow:

But again, Card at the time he wrote Ender’s Game was doing the rounds at sci-fi conventions literally preaching open-mindedness and tolerance (albeit not specifically to gays). I don’t think he was the same guy that wrote his later screeds against homosexuals.

Also, the sequels to Ender’s books made it pretty clear that the stuff Ender did in the first book was a bad thing. And even in Ender’s Game, the characters are pretty conflicted about it. I don’t think it reads as an apologia for mass murder.

(and I think Cruise is a good actor to, :slight_smile: )

Yeah, he wasn’t always that way. Anybody who thinks he was hasn’t been a fan for very long. I personally was introduced to his work by reading Ender’s Game back in 1988, and he was a very different person back then.

I’ll admit he’s been pro-Mormon and very in favor of having lots of kids (which is a corollary to being Mormon) for pretty much as long as he’s been writing.

He didn’t used to get into political arguments at book signings, though. I’ve gone to his signings at least 5 or 6 times since the mid-90s, and things have changed. In addition, he has started letting his pro-military/anti-liberal opinions into his work in the last 10 years or so, and that’s an unwelcome change.

I really think the Lewinsky scandal, plus personal changes, AND 9/11 all contributed to what is going on with him. Maybe he’ll get over it, but it won’t happen in time. When the Ender’s Game movie comes out, people unaware of him are going to be unpleasantly surprised, if they try to find out more about the author of the original novel.

It’s just going to be a clusterfuck.

Except that Tom Cruise and Mel Gibson aren’t openly taking parts as “crazy Scientologist” and “Crazy Anti-Semitic Misogynistic Racist” in all their movies of the past 10 years. Sadly, that’s pretty much where OSC’s fiction is.

Even his early stuff, yes. Pick up a copy of “Songbird” sometimes. Used, of course, or better yet, from the library.

And if you want someone to read “Ender’s Game?” Buy them a copy of John Steakley’s “Armor” instead. Much better exploration of the concept, but without the Ender-is-Christ angle.

Was Larry Niven headed straight into the toilet before he met Jerry Pournelle?

Yeah, true enough. Well, I think my point still stands - get opinions from more than one source, especially when that source is an entertainer of some kind. :slight_smile:

I believe he’s also one of those anti-gay writers who justifies prohibitions against homosexual behavior by saying that if it were okay for men to fuck men, then men would never fuck women and the species would end. Which pretty much says “closet case” to me, because wtf?

In my dreams, maybe, all hot guys are just as happy to fuck other hot guys. Unfortunately this is not the case in real life.

I agree, Tom; closet case…

Ha, found a podcast of OSC from a long time ago - his Secular Humanist Revival meeting. Very amusing, from a very different OSC. Whatever happened to this guy?

http://www.radio4all.net/index.php/program/60671

True in general, but OSC is a smart guy. There are some people who make me wonder how they can be so smart—so knowledgeable, so thoughtful, so well-read, so articulate—and yet at the same time be so stupid—so blind, so thick-headed, so missing the point, so wrong about certain things. Card is such a person.

I’ve read and enjoyed quite a bit of his work. His Mormon point of view, when it shows, isn’t necessarily a bad thing; I don’t want to only read books by authors with a narrow range of backgrounds and points of view.

That, and/or maybe it’s something to do with how uniquely central marriage and family seem to be to Mormon beliefs (or at least that’s the impression I get).

No, they’re using their fame to give their opinion a wider broadcast. The weight assigned to it is the responsibility of each member of the audience. Ideally, they would use the same criteria they’d use to evaluate the opinions of anyone else; some actors, etc., just like non-famous people, are knowledgeable or insightful in certain areas outside their working field. Do you think that nobody should ever listen to your opinion about anything other than your own job?

Did he really say that? If so, then yeah, he’s gayer than jizz on a mustache. But I doubt he said anything so obviously closet-case like.

Unfortunately, they were the same damn book…

No, alas, I’m in the same boat as several others: I loved his fiction, until I learned what kind of monster he is, and swore him off. It amazes me that someone who can write from the viewpoint of the gentle, mature wisdom of Speaker for the Dead can, himself, have such contempt for gentility, maturity, and wisdom.

I just found this essaywhich proposes that Ender’s Game was really an apologia for Hitler and that Card might not even be the actual author.