# I put the author of "The Secret" and everyone who quotes it.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [April 8, 2012, 4:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183 "2012-04-08T16:27:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Odesio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/odesio/32/20003_2.png) [@Odesio](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Odesio)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 4:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/201 "2012-04-14T04:52:41Z")

</div>

> [@Lord\_Ashtar](#):
>
> If you say so. For the record, I have posted my picture.

I guess I missed it at [http://www.nouilles.info/sdpix/index.html](http://www.nouilles.info/sdpix/index.html)

But maybe there’s another gallery I’m not aware of.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 4:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/202 "2012-04-14T04:53:51Z")

</div>

> [@Lord\_Ashtar](#):
>
> If you say so. For the record, I have posted my picture.
> 
> (I guess it’s a good thing I didn’t go with my first instinct and ask **Stoid** how expecting to become thin while eating multiple servings of cornbread at a time was working out for her.)

Fantastically, thank you for asking! I’ve lost about 55 pounds and I’m feeling great.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zweisamkeit](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zweisamkeit/32/4360_2.png) [@zweisamkeit](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/zweisamkeit)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 5:02am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/203 "2012-04-14T05:02:51Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> I do find it intriguing that you or anyone else would react so harshly to this belief system as something so wildly outrageous, while probably having little to no reaction to someone coming along to explain exactly how any particular Christian faith believes.

That’s a potentially good point, though you mess it up by attributing it to your opponents yourself (and spare me any “I didn’t explicitly say I knew for a fact you blahblahblah-”. Your phrasing is obvious).

> [@](#):
>
> Do you think Christianity is more rational than a belief in the law of attraction?

Nope.

> [@](#):
>
> Does believing in a universal mind of which we are all a part through which the law operates _really_ strike you as _ **so** _ much wackier, trollier, crazier than an all-powerful creator setting up a series of elaborate hoops to be jumped through in order for it to feel sufficiently loved by it’s creations? Or are you maybe overreacting just because it’s less familiar?

And nope… and nope. Thanks for playing!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 5:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/204 "2012-04-14T05:13:36Z")

</div>

> [@zweisamkeit](#):
>
> That’s a potentially good point, though you mess it up by attributing it to your opponents yourself (and spare me any “I didn’t explicitly say I knew for a fact you blahblahblah-”. Your phrasing is obvious).

I’m not really following what you mean here, what you are referring to in anticipating my response. So I guess no need to worry I’ll respond that way.

> [@](#):
>
> Nope.  
> And nope… and nope. Thanks for playing!

Good! Consistency is a good thing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Ashtar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ea924/32.png) [@Lord\_Ashtar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Ashtar)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 7:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/205 "2012-04-14T07:03:34Z")

</div>

> [@Odesio](#):
>
> I guess I missed it at [nouilles.info](http://www.nouilles.info/sdpix/index.html)
> 
> But maybe there’s another gallery I’m not aware of.

I’ve posted it on this board before. If you’ve suddenly got such a big a hardon for me, find it yourself.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Fantastically, thank you for asking! I’ve lost about 55 pounds and I’m feeling great.

Hmm. Well, keep it up then.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 11:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/206 "2012-04-14T11:06:21Z")

</div>

I also found this unsubstantiated:

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Did you think me sarcastic? Not a bit.

[Judge](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=14939154&postcount=228) for [yourself](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=14940955&postcount=245).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 11:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/207 "2012-04-14T11:26:57Z")

</div>

Oh, forgot to post this:

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Beyond the fact that no subject is beneath being understood accurately, assuming you know in advance whether that’s true from a position of ignorance is inherently nonsensical.

Claiming to be disinterested when it’s apparent you’re not is disingenuous though.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 11:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/208 "2012-04-14T11:38:04Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Of course there is: to preclude making it about _me_ in any respect. I shared my _knowledge_, which is all I was ever interested in sharing. What you assume or think you know is entirely about _you_, and I’m not interested in discussing _that_, either.

That makes no sense. If you don’t believe in it and mentioned that, it would serve to make it less about you, since no one would have any grounds with which to attack you. Only if you did believe in it would it be about you.

And what the hell do you think I would actually discuss about you? I just pointed out that you have given every reason for people to believe you believe in the Secret. You know a ton about it, you say nothing negative about it, you won’t say you don’t believe it when it makes sense to do so, and you get all defensive anytime anyone accuses you of believing it.

The only reason I would discuss your belief with you is if you keep insisting that we somehow don’t know what you believe. And even then, I’m not to inclined to do so, since you have shown in the past that, once you get your mind at something, you won’t change it no matter what the evidence to the contrary. I only said anything to point it out to the person I was responding to.

And perhaps to dare you into proving me wrong. If you really don’t believe, admitting it will get people to no longer focus on you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 11:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/209 "2012-04-14T11:40:03Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> Judge for yourself

A: Why would you think I was claiming that I am never sarcastic at all? Of course I’m sarcastic sometimes. How weird.

B: But the posts you cite in the other thread contain no sarcasm, either. Everything I said I meant. (I think, I scanned and nothing popped…)

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> Oh, forgot to post this:  
> Claiming to be disinterested when it’s apparent you’re not is disingenuous though.

I didn’t say I was disinterested in the subject itself, that would make no sense. When I am disinterested I don’t participate in the discussion at all. What I have no interest in is how people ultimately view the belief system, which is different than being disinterested in the topic altogether.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 11:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/210 "2012-04-14T11:53:33Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> That makes no sense. If you don’t believe in it and mentioned that, it would serve to make it less about you, since no one would have any grounds with which to attack you.

What an odd way of looking at things. Why would my belief in anything at all be grounds to attack _ **me** _, vs. the belief I hold? And if you agree that you are entitled to attack the belief, then you don’t need to know whether it is mine or not in order to proceed with that attack. If you don’t agree, and feel you have some inherent right to attack me and somehow think it’s my responsibility to make sure you don’t by giving you what you want, well, then, I guess that makes you a bully and me someone that has no interest in being bullied.

> [@](#):
>
> The only reason I would discuss your belief with you is if you keep insisting that we somehow don’t know what you believe.

But that makes no sense: the only reason it is coming up is because other people are making it an issue, not me. I stated at the outset what my intention was, and others decided to ignore that and press me or make assumptions about what I believe. Since I made my intention and purpose clear at the outset, I felt and feel no responsibility to anyone else to answer their demands for knowledge of my mind. I issued no invitation and in fact sought to preclude the inquiry. That others made the decision to ignore that is not my problem.

> [@](#):
>
> And perhaps to dare you into proving me wrong. If you really don’t believe, admitting it will get people to no longer focus on you.

Again, it’s your issue, not mine. I took responsibility for where I wanted to be in this and communicated it directly, specifically, and unambiguously. How other people behave after that is not my responsibility to control at all, much less by the rules they set for me to follow.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 12:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/211 "2012-04-14T12:09:45Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> I didn’t say I was disinterested in the subject itself, that would make no sense. When I am disinterested I don’t participate in the discussion at all. What I have no interest in is how people ultimately view the belief system, which is different than being disinterested in the topic altogether.

It’s possible to be disinterested in the outcome of a thread and still participate in it. For example, the moderator in the Straight Dope Presidential Election thread will do his best to remain disinterested, but not [uninterested](http://boards.straightdope.com/sdmb/showpost.php?p=14940468&postcount=237).

On the other hand stating that:

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> It’s not my philosophy.

While simultaneously asserting that it works like the law of gravity or that people get what they expect, as in science, strikes me as disingenuous.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 12:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/212 "2012-04-14T12:15:17Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> While simultaneously asserting that it works like the law of gravity or that people get what they expect, as in science, strikes me as disingenuous.

That’s your failure not mine. Because I explain how something works doesn’t mean I believe it. I can explain Christianity- doesn’t mean I’m Christian. I can explain Mormonism-doesn’t make me a Mormon. I can explain Scientology-doesn’t make me a Scientologist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/213 "2012-04-14T12:38:38Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> you get all defensive anytime anyone accuses you of believing it.
> 
> .

Correction: I don’t become defensive I am simply correcting peoples assumptions and assertions that I believe. I would do exactly the same if people were assuming and asserting that I don’t believe. But they don’t make those assertions. All I am interested in doing is correcting people who assert **anything** as a fact when it comes to my beliefs on this subject, because no one knows.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 12:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/214 "2012-04-14T12:43:33Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> No, you’dhave a better understanding of how it works.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> it’s operating no matter how aware of it people are or aren’t.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> People get what they expect because their behavior falls in line with their beliefs and expectations and influences their lives.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> So of course I recognize that people do tend to get what they expect. So does science, no Secret necessary.

Do you condemn this? If not, it’s entirely reasonable to operate on the view that you’re condoning it. If you want to attempt to demonstrate a phenomenon, you’re going to have to do better for cites than linking to the wikipedia article for “Religious Science”, which is to my mind a contradiction in terms. Science is founded on the principle of empiricism and evidence (and since Popper, disprovability), while religion is founded on the principle of faith. Nothing is gained in the synthesis of those two things.

For example, to support the last statement quoted above, you’d need to refute the Dunning-Kruger effect. If you can’t, I expect you to retract the comment, or at least add a disclaimer that “this is a widely held misconception”.

I’d also like to see your psychological articles that demonstrate the effects of wishful thinking - perhaps the “stereotype threat” would be a good place to start.

As an aside:

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Do you think Christianity is more rational than a belief in the law of attraction?

Tu quoque.

Edit:

Forgot to point out that adherents to “[The Secret](http://skeptoid.com/episodes/4096)” are probably suffering from a form of confirmation bias, in which they overemphasise times when their anticipation was correct. This is amplified when someone that believes in “The Secret” becomes successful: the spotlight fallacy comes into play. It’s similar to the Ponzi schemes in which a rich person gives a lecture on how to become rich quick. The simplest method throughout history has been to divorce gullible people from their possessions voluntarily by charging them for attending such lectures. Same schtick in prosperity theology.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gamerunknown](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/6bbea6/32.png) [@gamerunknown](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gamerunknown)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 12:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/215 "2012-04-14T12:59:35Z")

</div>

Uhnf, missed the edit window on a comment that occurred to me. “The Secret” essentially mandates a belief in dualism. There is no method of divorcing thoughts from the physical processes that give rise to them in an empirical fashion. Thus, empirically, thoughts are a product of the environment and not the other way around. To believe otherwise is to stray beyong what we’re capable of demonstrating empirically and requires a faith in a spirit of some sort that is communicating thoughts intangibly to each individual.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 1:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/216 "2012-04-14T13:27:53Z")

</div>

> [@gamerunknown](#):
>
> Do you condemn this? If not, it’s entirely reasonable to operate on the view that you’re condoning it.

Only if you operate from the bizarre position that everything in life must be condemned or condoned which I do not, but you apparently do.

> [@](#):
>
> If you want to attempt to demonstrate a phenomenon,

Well, I don’t want to attempt to demonstrate a phenomenon. Should that change I’ll be sure to let you know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![florez](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/b9e5f3/32.png) [@florez](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/florez)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/217 "2012-04-14T19:29:29Z")

</div>

Stoid speaks with forked tongue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lord\_Ashtar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/7ea924/32.png) [@Lord\_Ashtar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lord_Ashtar)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 8:17pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/218 "2012-04-14T20:17:59Z")

</div>

Last night I was drunk and angry about some stuff that’s been going on for me personally. I lashed out and took a couple cheap shots at **Stoid**. I apologize to her for the personal attacks.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 10:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/219 "2012-04-14T22:38:09Z")

</div>

> [@Lord\_Ashtar](#):
>
> Last night I was drunk and angry about some stuff that’s been going on for me personally. I lashed out and took a couple cheap shots at **Stoid**. I apologize to her for the personal attacks.

That’s very nice of you, Lord Ashtar. Apology accepted.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Trepa\_Mayfield](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/edb3f5/32.png) [@Trepa\_Mayfield](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Trepa_Mayfield)\
**Post date:** [April 14, 2012, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183/220 "2012-04-14T22:44:50Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> I’m not arguing. I’m not promoting. I’m not defending. I’m explaining.

You are arguing. People are saying things, and you are rebutting their points with your own. Then they rebut your points, and you rebut their rebuttal. That’s the basic definition of arguing.

I believe you that you are not _trying_ to defend or promote this belief system. But your posts sound like you are promoting and defending, because what you will do is explain the belief system works from the perspective of a believer in a post and at no point say that you don’t personally believe that belief system. So anyone who reads those posts will think you’re promoting and defending those belief systems.

Come to think of it, you’re kind of acting like Bricker, except instead of looking through the legal lens for a thread, you’re looking through the crazy person lens. I can dig it.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Does believing in a universal mind of which we are all a part through which the law operates _really_ strike you as _ **so** _ much wackier, trollier, crazier than an all-powerful creator setting up a series of elaborate hoops to be jumped through in order for it to feel sufficiently loved by it’s creations? Or are you maybe overreacting just because it’s less familiar?

No, I’m an atheist. As I imagine are most of the people angry enough about _The Secret_ to argue with you about it.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183.md?page=10)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-put-the-author-of-the-secret-and-everyone-who-quotes-it/618183.md?page=12)
