# I sometimes wonder which party has the dumbest and most vulgar fools within it

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [May 13, 2016, 6:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657 "2016-05-13T06:42:10Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Salvor](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b5e925/32.png) [@Salvor](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Salvor)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 6:42am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/1 "2016-05-13T06:42:10Z")

</div>

And then I read a story with comments like this to tilt the scales.

> **[George Zimmerman gun ad yanked by one website but posted by another](https://www.foxnews.com/us/george-zimmerman-gun-ad-yanked-by-one-website-but-posted-by-another)**
>
> An online gun auction website yanked George Zimmerman's ad to sell the pistol he used to kill unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin, saying it wanted no part in the deal, but a second site offered to post it.

Check out those comments. YOU WIN republicans, you are the most vulgar, death celebrating cretins around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 12:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/2 "2016-05-13T12:38:22Z")

</div>

You’re citing a news article sourced at Fox News and you think that there is an even distribution of political affiliation responding to it?

Think about it. Put 10,000 Pubbies in a room with 1,000 Demmies and I’m pretty sure the number of stupid comments are going to skew to the conservative side.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![raventhief](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/raventhief/32/4_2.png) [@raventhief](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/raventhief)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 1:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/3 "2016-05-13T13:26:10Z")

</div>

I don’t think “quantity” was the point of the OP. I haven’t actually read the comments in question, so i could be wrong.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![naita](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/naita/32/5862_2.png) [@naita](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/naita)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 1:28pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/4 "2016-05-13T13:28:22Z")

</div>

> [@BubbaDog](#):
>
> You’re citing a news article sourced at Fox News and you think that there is an even distribution of political affiliation responding to it?
> 
> Think about it. Put 10,000 Pubbies in a room with 1,000 Demmies and I’m pretty sure the number of stupid comments are going to skew to the conservative side.

You respond to a post commenting on the type of comments a source contains and you think that it is a comment on the quantity?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bobot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bobot/32/21622_2.png) [@bobot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/bobot)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/5 "2016-05-13T14:06:38Z")

</div>

Here’s a link to a Fox news story, read the comments at the bottom, I dare you! Ha-ha!  
Man, that’s like saying: Here, smell this!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sitnam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6a8cbe/32.png) [@Sitnam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sitnam)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 2:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/6 "2016-05-13T14:31:58Z")

</div>

> [@BubbaDog](#):
>
> You’re citing a news article sourced at Fox News and you think that there is an even distribution of political affiliation responding to it?

It could be that only one side has the numbers capable of sustaining a network like Fox News to tell you all you need to know.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BubbaDog](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bubbadog/32/333_2.png) [@BubbaDog](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BubbaDog)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 3:15pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/7 "2016-05-13T15:15:37Z")

</div>

> [@raventhief](#):
>
> I don’t think “quantity” was the point of the OP. I haven’t actually read the comments in question, so i could be wrong.

On second glance I agree. ARE the most is not HAVE the most. Gotta practice my “reading for comprehension” skills.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Buck\_Godot](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/buck_godot/32/6573_2.png) [@Buck\_Godot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Buck_Godot)\
**Post date:** [May 13, 2016, 3:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-sometimes-wonder-which-party-has-the-dumbest-and-most-vulgar-fools-within-it/754657/8 "2016-05-13T15:22:20Z")

</div>

> [@Salvor](#):
>
> I sometimes wonder which party has the dumbest and most vulgar fools within it

Realy? Where have you been for the last 8 years.

I sometime wonder whether which gender wears more frilly underwear. Then I went to Victoria’s Secret which tipped the scales.
