# I take umbrage with both this warning and the mod attitude

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138>\
**Category:** About This Message Board\
**Created:** [April 18, 2012, 8:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138 "2012-04-18T08:13:08Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:05am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/41 "2012-04-19T03:05:03Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> I remain, as ever, completely befuddled how it is any more polite to insult the post instead of the poster.

The vast majority of posters seem to have no problem understanding it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Inner\_Stickler](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/inner_stickler/32/318_2.png) [@Inner\_Stickler](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Inner_Stickler)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/42 "2012-04-19T03:11:36Z")

</div>

I have seen no evidence that they understand how it is more polite, only that it is a fiction they must abide by.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/43 "2012-04-19T03:18:56Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> I remain, as ever, completely befuddled how it is any more polite to insult the post instead of the poster.

I like to think I’m not an idiot but I know for a fact that I post idiotic things from time to time, and when I do I don’t mind (too much) that being pointed out firmly.

I don’t suppose anyone likes to be told (a) they are stupid or (b) they have done something stupid, but the latter is less confronting than the former. The SDMB has to draw the line somewhere, and it chooses to draw the line between these two points. It’s a judgment call but I think it’s a good one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/44 "2012-04-19T03:33:50Z")

</div>

> [@Inner\_Stickler](#):
>
> I have seen no evidence that they understand how it is more polite, only that it is a fiction they must abide by.

If you haven’t seen that evidence, you haven’t looked for it or have ignored it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:35am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/45 "2012-04-19T03:35:49Z")

</div>

The only problem I have is that there are many times when insulting the post is clearly meant to insult the poster, and it’s clear by the responses that everyone understands that this is the intent.

Save for one time in IMHO that I fiercely objected to because it had been allowed so often before.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BigT](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bigt/32/12044_2.png) [@BigT](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BigT)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:52am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/46 "2012-04-19T03:52:41Z")

</div>

> [@Colibri](#):
>
> If you haven’t seen that evidence, you haven’t looked for it or have ignored it.

Yip, if someone disagrees with you, they must either be ignoring people or have not looked at the evidence.

All I know is that I’m always the person who has to explain to the newbie that there is a difference. I’m the one who explains what I didn’t know when I first came here: the “don’t be a jerk” rule doesn’t actually mean what it says. It just means that you have to be clever in how you act like a jerk so you don’t break the rules.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Colibri](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/colibri/32/1841_2.png) [@Colibri](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Colibri)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 4:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/47 "2012-04-19T04:04:23Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Yip, if someone disagrees with you, they must either be ignoring people or have not looked at the evidence.

In this particular case, yes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FinnAgain](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/finnagain/32/12500_2.png) [@FinnAgain](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/FinnAgain)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 4:53am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/48 "2012-04-19T04:53:07Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> All I know is that I’m always the person who has to explain to the newbie that there is a difference.

Yes, I think we’re all well aware of how all new posters have their obligate meeting with, and induction conducted by, BigT.  
Truly, you have selflessly shouldered a great burden and should be recognized and congratulated for your suffering in silence.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 4:56am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/49 "2012-04-19T04:56:39Z")

</div>

> [@BigT](#):
>
> Yip, if someone disagrees with you, they must either be ignoring people or have not looked at the evidence.rules.

Perhaps you should do a poll and see whether the majority understand why it is more polite. I understand and I am not so arrogant as to think this is due to any great intellect on my part.

And while some say that you are allowed to be a jerk but just have to be clever about how you are a jerk, I don’t think that is meaningfully accurate. It’s just that there has to be a line between what is and what is not going to be regarded as jerkish, and that line has to be arbitrarily drawn somewhere. Jerkish-ness is a continuum. There are people who would take offence and regard anyone who firmly contradicts their posts, even politely, as a jerk. There are people who are much more thick skinned and wouldn’t care what the hell you say about their posts. Are mods to somehow attempt to draw a line on this continuum to say just how rude you can be about someone’s post?

The current system of “you can insult the post, but not the poster” is a nice clear line which at least has the benefit of certainty. You could draw the line in other places, but I don’t think it would assist.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 1:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/50 "2012-04-19T13:26:36Z")

</div>

> [@FinnAgain](#):
>
> Yes, I think we’re all well aware of how all new posters have their obligate meeting with, and induction conducted by, BigT.  
> Truly, you have selflessly shouldered a great burden and should be recognized and congratulated for your suffering in silence.

Sir, you need a permit for that much sarcasm, and I don’t remember issuing you one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Frodo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/frodo/32/302_2.png) [@Frodo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Frodo)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 1:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/51 "2012-04-19T13:35:36Z")

</div>

> [@VinylTurnip](#):
>
> Sir, you need a permit for that much sarcasm, and I don’t remember issuing you one.

I don’t know, what where the readings in the Sarcasm Detector™?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![VinylTurnip](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b2d939/32.png) [@VinylTurnip](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/VinylTurnip)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 2:49pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/52 "2012-04-19T14:49:53Z")

</div>

Can’t make heads or tails of it. I put a call in to David Cross at the Bill Hicks Institute.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Czarcasm](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/czarcasm/32/4050_2.png) [@Czarcasm](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Czarcasm)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/53 "2012-04-19T15:02:29Z")

</div>

It only scored a 4.8 on the Rickman Scale.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Darth\_Panda](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ee7513/32.png) [@Darth\_Panda](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Darth_Panda)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 3:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/54 "2012-04-19T15:36:42Z")

</div>

> [@cochrane](#):
>
> I tried to take Umbrage. But I couldn’t find it on the map.

Use an older map. I think it’s somewhere south of this place: [Northumbria - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northumbria)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BunnyTVS](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/977dab/32.png) [@BunnyTVS](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BunnyTVS)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 9:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/55 "2012-04-19T21:39:57Z")

</div>

> [@Darth\_Panda](#):
>
> Use an older map. I think it’s somewhere south of this place: [Northumbria - Wikipedia](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northumbria)

Close, it’s actually what Northumbrian trolls live under.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hbns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hbns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hbns)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 10:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/56 "2012-04-19T22:02:21Z")

</div>

> [@Princhester](#):
>
> The current system of “you can insult the post, but not the poster” is a nice clear line which at least has the benefit of certainty. You could draw the line in other places, but I don’t think it would assist.

I’m kinda new here. So let me get this straight. All would have been fine if **Martini** instead had said:

‘It’s people like you, making _ **dickish posts** _ for no reason, that remind_ **s** _ me why I took an extended break from this place.’

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 11:10pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/57 "2012-04-19T23:10:21Z")

</div>

Well that is still personal in that it is saying “people like you”. It’s still aimed at the post. But while a mod can correct me if I’m wrong, simply saying that it was a dickish post would be alright.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Princhester](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/3e96dc/32.png) [@Princhester](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Princhester)\
**Post date:** [April 19, 2012, 11:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/58 "2012-04-19T23:24:36Z")

</div>

Sorry, that should be “it’s still aimed at the poster”.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Hbns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/8edcca/32.png) [@Hbns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Hbns)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2012, 1:51am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/59 "2012-04-20T01:51:17Z")

</div>

> [@Princhester](#):
>
> Well that is still personal in that it is saying “people like you”. It’s still aimed at the post. But while a mod can correct me if I’m wrong, simply saying that it was a dickish post would be alright.

This sharp distinction seems to get blurrier by the moment.  
How about:  
’  
[QUOTE=HypotheticalPoster]

No.  
No.  
No.  
No.  
[/QUOTE]

What a dickish post.’

Substitute ‘stupid’ or ‘clueless’. Does it pass the smell test then?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mean_mr.mustard/32/3865_2.png) [@Mean\_Mr.Mustard](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mean_Mr.Mustard)\
**Post date:** [April 20, 2012, 2:11am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138/60 "2012-04-20T02:11:52Z")

</div>

I’ve lost track…someone help me out…who currently has the umbrage?  
mmm

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138.md?page=2)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-take-umbrage-with-both-this-warning-and-the-mod-attitude/619138.md?page=4)
