# I unhappily report that I am right about obesity and diet (Very long)

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [February 16, 2011, 4:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543 "2011-02-16T04:25:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 54

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2011, 9:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1061 "2011-03-29T21:59:46Z")

</div>

> [@LilyoftheField](#):
>
> I’m wondering why Stoid didn’t lose those pounds on her initial low-cal diet per the original post.

It’s my understanding that it’s something particular to a low-carb diet. Your body gets rid of a lot of water, and the water stays off until the point if/when you start eating more carbs again, at which point you quickly gain that water weight back. So there would be no water weight loss with a simple reduction in calories, but there would be a water weight loss with a reduction in calories that was the result of the virtual elimination of carbs, a loss that would not bounce back until \*\*Stoid \*\*started eating carbs again.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> I disagree.

I’m not surprised. It jibes with the rest of your understanding of how science and logic work.

There’s an invisible, intangible, floating dragon living in my building’s garage that doesn’t require air, food, or water, and doesn’t excrete anything. But I’m not going to prove that it exists. You have to prove that it doesn’t.

> [@](#):
>
> ( c) None of the above.

Then why can’t you show me even a \*single example \*of a time on this forum where you changed your mind about something?

> [@](#):
>
> Really? Then what was the purpose of that remark? Seems very much intended to be rainy to me, can’t see any sunny reason…

The parade raining was simply a side effect of pointing out the facts. If you “lost” fifteen pounds by weighing yourself holding a baby and then not holding a baby, I wouldn’t congratulate you for that, either.

> [@](#):
>
> Was this also not intended to rain on anyone’s parade?

Nope, that one was intentional parade-raiding.

> [@billfish678](#):
>
> I doubt that 🙂

I roffled.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2011, 10:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1062 "2011-03-29T22:04:10Z")

</div>

@ **Stoid** :

Also, you could easily counter any example I could find of you not being convinced by claiming that they just didn’t make a good enough argument (as you would with this thread). That’s why it’s so important for you to provide any example at all of a time when you changed your mind. If you are \*truly \*open to doing so, it must have happened _at least once_. That you’re afraid to even look for a single example is very telling.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2011, 10:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1063 "2011-03-29T22:44:36Z")

</div>

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> It’s my understanding that it’s something particular to a low-carb diet. Your body gets rid of a lot of water, and the water stays off until the point if/when you start eating more carbs again, at which point you quickly gain that water weight back. So there would be no water weight loss with a simple reduction in calories, but there would be a water weight loss with a reduction in calories that was the result of the virtual elimination of carbs, a loss that would not bounce back until \*\*Stoid \*\*started eating carbs again.

While any change in eating can result in an intial loss of water weight, the big factor for low-carb is two-fold.

The bigger factor is glycogen. Glycogen is stored in the liver and the muscles (it is essentially stored energy) and it is bound to water. When you drop carbohydrates from your diet, the body burns through this store of glycogen, releasing the water it held. This happens really fast for most people and can be five or ten pounds of “weight” lost in a few days to a week.

When you lose the glycogen stores, you do weigh less, but that weight will come back extremely quickly if the body gets a chance to put in some more glycogen (plus water!) stores. If you never eat a cookie again, that particular form of weight will not come back. But it’s pretty illusory since it has no bearing on how much fat someone is walking around with.

The second way the majority of diets can cause very quick water loss is that most of them encourage increased water consumption. A lot of people eat a great deal of salt and don’t drink all that much water. The kidneys then treat this as essentially dehydration and work to retain what water they have. Increasing water intake signals the kidneys that they don’t need to hold on to that excess water. Drink more water = retain less water (if the water retention is caused by this sort of sodium imbalance)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2011, 10:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1064 "2011-03-29T22:52:46Z")

</div>

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> There’s an invisible, intangible, floating dragon living in my building’s garage that doesn’t require air, food, or water, and doesn’t excrete anything. But I’m not going to prove that it exists. You have to prove that it doesn’t.

Only if I was invested in the answer somehow. Since I’m not, I don’t have to prove anything.

> [@](#):
>
> Then why can’t you show me even a \*single example \*of a time on this forum where you changed your mind about something?

“Can’t” is not accuarate; it implies that I made an attempt and failed. I made no such attempt. As for why I didn’t try, it is for reasons other than the two you apparently believe are the only reasons possible, obviously. But getting into it beyond that is turning this into the thread I’ve already told you I won’t turn it into.

> [@](#):
>
> I wouldn’t congratulate you for that, either.

There’s a great deal of difference between your personal decision on whether to congratulate anyone for anything, a matter about which no one inquired, and making it a point to question someone else’s decision to extend congratulations.

> [@](#):
>
> Nope, that one was intentional parade-raiding.

Always nice to know I have understood someone’s intentions correctly.

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> That’s why it’s so important for you to provide any example at all of a time when you changed your mind.

On the contrary, I don’t find it the slightest bit important to respond to baiting.

I will point out, however, that you have asserted that the “rule” is that the primary assertion is the one that must be proved, not the contrary response. Well, mine was not the primary assertion:

> [@leander](#):
>
> This is a person who cannot be convinced of anything other than what she believes.

So you have aligned yourself with the primary assertion…leander’s invisible dragon. I said the dragon doesn’t exist. By your own rules, it seems it’s on you to show me the dragon. If you choose not to, that’s fine with me - it’s your dragon, I don’t really care.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 29, 2011, 11:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1065 "2011-03-29T23:01:48Z")

</div>

> [@jsgoddess](#):
>
> While any change in eating can result in an intial loss of water weight, the big factor for low-carb is two-fold.

And no matter what the biological process that leads to this, all of it is evidence that a person has actually made a change in their diet in order to lose weight. Whether it’s fat or water at first doesn’t change the point of the congratulations, which is: \*Hey, you’re making the effort, and the objectively observable result of weight loss indicates you aren’t just talking, you’re actually doing something different that’s having an impact! Good for you! Keep it up!  
\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 4:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1066 "2011-03-30T04:39:28Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> Unfortunately, in the substantial amount of discussion that’s occurred over the last few years, very little in the way of evidence has been offered, and when it has been it frequently turns out to be inaccurate, irrelevant, and even completely misrepresented as to content.

But when it’s pointed out that is exactly what your new science hero Taubes is doing you scramble like mad to forgive him. Most telling.  
And by “most telling” I mean that I think you are kind of deluded as far as how arguments manage to persuade you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 6:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1067 "2011-03-30T06:04:13Z")

</div>

> [@CarnalK](#):
>
> And by “most telling” I mean that I think you are kind of deluded as far as how arguments manage to persuade you.

“scramble to forgive”? What weird wording.

In any case, I have been persuaded to put questions to the man himself, and I await his response. I wrote him a lengthy email yesterday - we’ll see what he says.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 6:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1068 "2011-03-30T06:19:15Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> “scramble to forgive”? What weird wording.
> 
> In any case, I have been persuaded to put questions to the man himself, and I await his response. I wrote him a lengthy email yesterday - we’ll see what he says.

Apropos alliteration aside and after reflection, I think I stand by my wording.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 2:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1069 "2011-03-30T14:07:31Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> “Can’t” is not accuarate; it implies that I made an attempt and failed. I made no such attempt.

Of course you didn’t.

> [@](#):
>
> Always nice to know I have understood someone’s intentions correctly.

Anybody getting super-huffy about how much more knowledgeable they are than everyone else because of a \*four-year degree \*deserves to have that bubble popped.

> [@](#):
>
> I will point out, however, that you have asserted that the “rule” is that the primary assertion is the one that must be proved, not the contrary response. Well, mine was not the primary assertion: […] So you have aligned yourself with the primary assertion…leander’s invisible dragon.

We have examples of times when you refuse to listen to logic, reasoning, and experts. People are pointing to your entire posting history here as proof of the fact that you don’t change your mind once you’ve made it up. That’s their cite. You then made a counter-claim: that you do, in fact, listen to and consider what you’ve been told. And yet, you can’t give us a single example of a time where that happened.

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> And no matter what the biological process that leads to this, all of it is evidence that a person has actually made a change in their diet in order to lose weight. Whether it’s fat or water at first doesn’t change the point of the congratulations, which is: \*Hey, you’re making the effort, and the objectively observable result of weight loss indicates you aren’t just talking, you’re actually doing something different that’s having an impact! Good for you! Keep it up!  
> \*

If you’re interested in congratulating people on meaningless milestones that require minimal effort to achieve, I guess. I dressed myself this morning; where’s my kudos for that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zyada](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/zyada/32/3028_2.png) [@Zyada](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zyada)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1070 "2011-03-30T14:48:10Z")

</div>

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> Anybody getting super-huffy about how much more knowledgeable they are than everyone else because of a \*four-year degree \*deserves to have that bubble popped.

_cough_

I’m the one who is referring to my bachelor’s in Psychology. Nor did I posit that I was more knowledgable than “everyone else” about human behavior. My statement was part of this conversation:

> [@Zyada](#):
>
> You assume that we have total control of our brains.
> 
> Speaking as a person with a BA in Psychology, and a person with Attention Deficit Disorder, and a person who has probably had more than her share of SOs with mental problems, I can assure you that you have far less control over your brain than you think you do, even for a person of your personality style.

> [@Crafter\_Man](#):
>
> I don’t buy the argument that a person is not in control of what they stick in their mouth. I think it’s nonsense.

> [@Zyada](#):
>
> And yet I’m the person with a degree in human behavior.

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> Oooooh, a _Bachelor’s_! My god, why aren’t you out giving lectures? :rolleyes:

> [@Zyada](#):
>
> At least I’ve got a little more grounding in the field than an electrical engineer.

If you insist on mis-construing my position, I can’t stop that, but in my eyes it strikes me as being either stupid or dishonest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Shot\_From\_Guns](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/ccd318/32.png) [@Shot\_From\_Guns](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Shot_From_Guns)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 2:54pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1071 "2011-03-30T14:54:26Z")

</div>

> [@Zyada](#):
>
> If you insist on mis-construing my position, I can’t stop that, but in my eyes it strikes me as being either stupid or dishonest.

Even re-quoted, it still strikes me the same way. However, \*you’re \*the one who knows your own intentions, so my apologies for misreading you.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 3:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1072 "2011-03-30T15:04:30Z")

</div>

> [@Shot\_From\_Guns](#):
>
> And yet, you can’t give us a single example of a time where that happened.

**False.**

I choose not to participate in your attempt to turn this thread into a discussion about me personally, which responding to your **baiting** would do, and is intended to do.

And now I am exiting this tangent altogether.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elysian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c77e96/32.png) [@Elysian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elysian)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 4:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1073 "2011-03-30T16:57:10Z")

</div>

Can’t win, don’t play!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 5:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1074 "2011-03-30T17:33:31Z")

</div>

…

> [@Elysian](#):
>
> Can’t win, don’t play!

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> I choose not to participate in your attempt to turn this thread into a discussion about me personally, which responding to your **baiting** would do, and is intended to do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Elysian](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/c77e96/32.png) [@Elysian](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Elysian)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 5:43pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1075 "2011-03-30T17:43:02Z")

</div>

Funny, Stoid, because I remember you admitting you were wrong once on this board…but I’m not going to tell you where, since you don’t want to make it personal!

Plus it was on such a fine point that it didn’t really matter whether you were wrong or not. It didn’t make you rethink your world view.

You know, you really should weigh yourself only once a week, because daily fluctuations will make it look like you haven’t lost anything. Weight Watchers advocates that, and I think it’s correct.

It would be really interesting to see whether you continue to lose weight with your cornbread indulgences. As far as I understand, consuming that many carbs puts you back at square one, so to speak, in the low carb diet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![wonky](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/wonky/32/393_2.png) [@wonky](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/wonky)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 6:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1076 "2011-03-30T18:25:22Z")

</div>

> [@Elysian](#):
>
> It would be really interesting to see whether you continue to lose weight with your cornbread indulgences. As far as I understand, consuming that many carbs puts you back at square one, so to speak, in the low carb diet.

It can cause a significant bump in weight since it allows the body to restore the glycogen + water that was lost at the outset. Different people will see a different amount of gain from something like a large quantity of cornbread.

It can also make cravings really strong. When people go off-plan with low-carb, they really need to see if they get better value from the feeling of not being permanently deprived or the feeling of making steady progress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Drain\_Bead](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/e47774/32.png) [@Drain\_Bead](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Drain_Bead)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 7:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1077 "2011-03-30T19:04:13Z")

</div>

I think the cravings is the main reason why I don’t “cheat” at all. I made Paleo brownies 10 days ago and I’ve had exactly 4 of them (out of 24). They’re damned good–I gave them to people without telling them they were Paleo, and they couldn’t tell–I just don’t crave them, so I forget they’re there! If I had more frequent cheats, I might have eaten more of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 10:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1078 "2011-03-30T22:11:30Z")

</div>

> [@Elysian](#):
>
> You know, you really should weigh yourself only once a week, because daily fluctuations will make it look like you haven’t lost anything. Weight Watchers advocates that, and I think it’s correct.

I [disagree](http://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1005&context=kine_fac&sei-redir=1#search=%22studies+show+daily+weighers+more+successful.%22). So does [all the data](http://www.fitcysters.com/forum/topics/article-people-who-weigh)we have on the subject. So you and Weight Watchers need to catch up.

I believe I’ll stick with what actually works best.

> [@](#):
>
> It would be really interesting to see whether you continue to lose weight with your cornbread indulgences. As far as I understand, consuming that many carbs puts you back at square one, so to speak, in the low carb diet.

Well, your understanding is extremely limited, as evidenced by this remark. You can’t even seem to follow along with the fact that there was a single cornbread indulgence, for instance, not to mention that I’ve lost the majority of what I’ve lost in the wake of that indulgence. And the ice cream 9 days afterwards. So, since ,y loss is now at 12 pounds, whatever carbs I’ve indulged in haven’t stopped anything.

Neither have the calories, since this week’s indulgence was totally low carb and exceedingly high calorie: creme brulee without the brulee, also known as insanely rich custard made from egg yolks, cream, and Truvia. That I find much harder to resist than cornbread, and I ate quite a bit over two days. But so far so good…

> [@Drain\_Bead](#):
>
> I think the cravings is the main reason why I don’t “cheat” at all. I made Paleo brownies 10 days ago and I’ve had exactly 4 of them (out of 24). They’re damned good–I gave them to people without telling them they were Paleo, and they couldn’t tell–I just don’t crave them, so I forget they’re there! If I had more frequent cheats, I might have eaten more of them.

I hear you. I’m not sure how much the sweetness of the custard was responsible, even though it was stevia and even though I didn’t make it very sweet because I don’t like it sweet, or whether it’s just the fact that I happen to love custard in all ways, but it was very hard to restrain myself. So I think I need to keep that to a mimimum. Making a smaller batch at a time will help, it takes time to bake and then to chill, so if I only make a small amount…

Paleo brownies? Got a link? Most of those attempts to fake baked things really fail for me, I’m curious what the “Paleo” take is.

(Is cocoa very “Paleo” at all? Isn’t Paleo partly just about avoiding processing?)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Submerged](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/da6949/32.png) [@Submerged](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Submerged)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 10:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1079 "2011-03-30T22:29:13Z")

</div>

> [@Stoid](#):
>
> …cornbread indulgence, …And the ice cream 9 days afterwards. …this week’s indulgence was creme brulee without the brulee, also known as insanely rich custard made from egg yolks, cream, and Truvia. That I find much harder to resist than cornbread, and **I ate quite a bit** over two days.

Didn’t you just finish stating that staying on your diet for ten days is easy?

Looks like you can’t go a week without cheating and “eating quite a bit of” high-carb “indulgences”. :rolleyes:

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stoid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/stoid/32/272_2.png) [@Stoid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stoid)\
**Post date:** [March 30, 2011, 10:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543/1080 "2011-03-30T22:55:07Z")

</div>

> [@Submerged](#):
>
> Didn’t you just finish stating that staying on your diet for ten days is easy?
> 
> Looks like you can’t go a week without cheating and “eating quite a bit of” high-carb “indulgences”. :rolleyes:

What is the resistence to reading around here?:rolleyes:

> [@](#):
>
> \*\*totally low carb \*\*and exceedingly high calorie: creme brulee without the brulee, also known as insanely rich custard made from egg yolks, cream, and Truvia.

100% within my plan. It simply puts the calorie issue to the test in a major way. So far, so good.

Sorry if you find that a letdown.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543.md?page=53)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-unhappily-report-that-i-am-right-about-obesity-and-diet-very-long/571543.md?page=55)
