# I want to have a steampunk lamp. But what is steampunk anyway?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [August 27, 2022, 11:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452 "2022-08-27T23:50:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GuanoLad](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/guanolad/32/42_2.png) [@GuanoLad](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GuanoLad)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2022, 11:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/61 "2022-08-30T11:25:12Z")

</div>

That would be amazing, but somewhat overkill. I’d do it if I was wealthy, or owned my own house which I was decorating in a particular style, or something like that. But I’m just renting a tiny place that has a dark corner I’d like lit up a bit.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jasmine](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jasmine/32/2964_2.png) [@Jasmine](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jasmine)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2022, 11:29am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/62 "2022-08-30T11:29:20Z")

</div>

Oh, okay, I understand. Well, if you procure one, you must post a pic! 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalMeacham](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/calmeacham/32/35_2.png) [@CalMeacham](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CalMeacham)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2022, 11:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/63 "2022-08-30T11:59:45Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> > [@MrDibble](#):
> >
> > Verne is a big - the biggest - _influence_ on steampunk
> 
> Yes, that is exactly what I said. Or did you miss that I used the word “influence” several times, and that the piece you quoted was surrounded by me talking about influences?
> 
> Of course influences are not considered the thing they evolve into at the time they are created. But whether we–today–call Verne Steampunk or proto-Steampunk or something else is an irrelevant distinction. My point was simply that if you want to transmit the aesthetic of Steampunk to someone unfamiliar with it, you would not go wrong to simply say “Jules Verne”, or more specifically “would that artifact make sense as a fixture on the _Nautilus_?”
> 
> That said, I also can’t disagree that the word largely has moved on to refer to gluing on gears and shit. Perhaps the issue is that in practice, it is as much a fashion aesthetic as a worldbuilding exercise, and fashion never made much sense.

I have argued that it wasn’t Jules Verne per se that was the biggest influence on steampunk. It was Harper Goff’s interpretation of the _Nautilus_ for the 1954 Walt Disney/Richard Fleischer version of _Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea_. (Goff was the designer for visual elements in the film) Goff deliberately changed the submarine as it had been described by Verne (and interpreted by illustrators and previous filmmakers) and gussied it up with lots of very visible bolts and rivets and mechanical ornamentation. His reason was that Verne’s image – a properly-streamlined craft that looked much like a weaver’s shuttle – was not visually interesting "You look at it once and you’ve _seen_ it Goff’s design had to be contemplated over a period of time to fully comprehend it. It had all those cutlicues that were meant to be structures for ramming and cutting through the ships it attacked, and meant to fit in with Verne’s descriptions of the surface as like scales or an alligator’s hide.

Here’s the Nautilus from the 1916 film:

> **[20,000 Leagues Under the Sea (1916) | Trailers From Hell](https://trailersfromhell.com/20000-leagues-under-the-sea-1916/)**
>
> A near-spotless restoration on the 104 year-old adaptation of the Jules Verne classic finally presents it in a form where we can judge its merits. The screenplay is an erratic jumble, imposing serial thrill elements onto an undigested amalgam of...

Here it is in Disney’s

> **[Disney's 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea](https://www.classicfilmtvcafe.com/2018/12/disney-20000-leagues-under-sea-film-review.html)**
>
> Kirk Douglas as Ned Land. It's a whale of a tale...I swear by my tattoo. Well, truth be told, I'm not a tattoo kind of guy, but Walt Dis...

Modellers who came up with Vernean craft later on were drawn to Goff’s style rather than to a literal interpretation of Verne. I saw it in models produced in the 1970s and 1980s.

If you look at illustrations of Verne’s stuff from contemporary illustrations, or of H.G. wells’ stuff, it looks interesting and strange, but not always in our modern “steampunk” aesthetic. “Steampunk” is an exaggeration of design trends from the late 19th/early20th century rather than a faithful duplication of them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2022, 1:42pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/64 "2022-08-30T13:42:28Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Basically most anything with exposed ducting and piping, so beloved of many steampunks and so antithetical to actual Victorian aesthetics.

I love “inside-out” architecture with actual steam pipes but, e.g., the Centre Pompidou opened in 1977, and is considered “high-tech”. Not sure if there was an equivalent Victorian style.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [August 30, 2022, 2:32pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/65 "2022-08-30T14:32:10Z")

</div>

> [@DPRK](#):
>
> Not sure if there was an equivalent Victorian style.

The closest I can think of is the Crystal Palace type of wrought iron architecture, with exposed structural components. But that’s not piping.

Of course, due to necessity, there would be exposed gas piping leading to light fixtures, but these wouldn’t be clunky, industrial iron with chunky connections, they’d be slim brass tubing with [ample](https://www.countrylife.co.uk/property/guides-advice/gas-lighting-in-victorian-times-16562) [decorations](https://www.1900s.org.uk/1900s-lighting.htm) that in no way would be mistaken for plumbing fixtures.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2022, 9:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/66 "2022-08-31T09:48:57Z")

</div>

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> I’d call any of those iron-plumbing-pipe-lamps, linked to earlier in the thread, “grungy”.

Agreed with that. It does seem, just browsing etsy and the like, that there may have been a shift in the “center” of the aesthetic toward stuff that’s a bit more like grungy iron pipework, and less polished brass gears and levers. It’s not antithetical to the Industrial Revolution, if we’re including that in the whole category. Steam train engines are a mess of pretty grungy pipework, after all, even if we imagine the passenger cars to be more luxurious looking. Both sides of the aesthetic spectrum were always there, but perhaps it’s moving toward more grunge.

> [@MrDibble](#):
>
> Sure. Also _Bioshock Infinite_, _Arcanum_, _Final Fantasy VI_ and later ones, _Thief_ series and that Victorian _Assassin’s Creed_ release - _Syndicate_, IIRC. Hell, even some of _World of Warcraft_’s aesthetic.

And the Dwemer ruins in the Elder Scrolls games. Though that’s veering into “magical steampunk” territory, which is arguably distinct.

> [@CalMeacham](#):
>
> I have argued that it wasn’t Jules Verne per se that was the biggest influence on steampunk.

That’s quite fair. It’s hard to tease apart, now–even going back to read Verne, how much of our imagery was influenced by the Disney movie? IIRC, I did actually see read the book before seeing the movie, but it’s still hard to separate.

Likely, as you hint, it’s similar for _The Time Machine_ and its 1960 movie. I’ll have to dig up the book and see how much of it really describes what we think of as steampunk today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![MrDibble](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mrdibble/32/114_2.png) [@MrDibble](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/MrDibble)\
**Post date:** [August 31, 2022, 10:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/67 "2022-08-31T10:12:33Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> And the Dwemer ruins in the Elder Scrolls games

Definitely.

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Though that’s veering into “magical steampunk” territory, which is arguably distinct.

_The Anubis Gates_ is one of the genre’s foundational works, I think there’s no need to carve out “magical steampunk” as distinct from the other stuff.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mama\_Zappa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/71e660/32.png) [@Mama\_Zappa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mama_Zappa)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 7:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/68 "2022-09-01T07:15:56Z")

</div>

That one is pretty cool! I imagine one could get some kind of light bulb that is orange-ish in color, to meet with what the OP wants.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 8:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/69 "2022-09-01T08:30:14Z")

</div>

You can get “low-wattage” incandescent bulbs with squirrel-cage-looking filament inside, which should have a pretty low, hence orange-ish, colour temperature.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 8:33am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/70 "2022-09-01T08:33:03Z")

</div>

You can also get the same thing with LED bulbs:

> **[Vintage Style LED](https://www.gelighting.com/vintage-led-bulbs)**
>
> Our long-lasting, energy-efficient vintage-style LED bulbs come in a variety of tones and finishes. Add vintage charm to your home today.

The “filaments” are actually LED strips with 50 or so tiny LEDs embedded.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 8:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/71 "2022-09-01T08:38:51Z")

</div>

You _can_, but that would be absolutely not steampunk 🙂 When I think of LEDs, the first thing that comes to mind is the 2006 Millennium Prize. Maybe save the LEDs and electroluminescent tubing for a cyberpunk lamp.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 8:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/72 "2022-09-01T08:45:12Z")

</div>

I’m ok with fake steampunk, as long as it’s faked in a way that _could_ be real. The LED filament bulbs could have been incandescent. The LEDs are just more efficient.

The _Galvanick Lucipher_ mentioned above would have a glass jar of acid, electrodes to form a battery, asbestos-insulated wires, and an arc lamp. It would have almost worked in real life. A fake version would have colored water for acid, maybe a smoke generator, fabric-woven wires, and a high-powered LED instead of an arc light. Oh, and a lithium ion battery buried somewhere inside. It would look the part, and that look is of something almost real. You just wouldn’t have to carry around a glass jar of _aqua regia_.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madmonk28](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/madmonk28/32/20811_2.png) [@madmonk28](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/madmonk28)\
**Post date:** [September 1, 2022, 4:46pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/73 "2022-09-01T16:46:23Z")

</div>

Yeah, a lot of the Williston Forge items fit the bill, but for some reason, I can’t seem to link directly to them here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mama\_Zappa](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/71e660/32.png) [@Mama\_Zappa](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mama_Zappa)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 3:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/74 "2022-09-02T15:13:45Z")

</div>

Hubbardton Forge (hand-made wrought iron; I have a number of their items) has one or two things that you might consider steampunk-y. A bit expensive, but very good quality. Their factory isn’t far from where my daughter lives; I keep hoping to visit it some time.

[https://www.hubbardtonforge.com/products/277810](https://www.hubbardtonforge.com/products/277810)

[https://www.hubbardtonforge.com/products/272840](https://www.hubbardtonforge.com/products/272840)

I think that lamp at Wayfair or wherever it was fits the bill better though.

(I just noticed in the description for the Ehrlenmeyer lamp that it specifically mentions steampunk).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![GaryM](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/garym/32/241_2.png) [@GaryM](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/GaryM)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 4:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/75 "2022-09-02T16:23:11Z")

</div>

I’m a Ham operator and bought one of those years ago. Neat little drive.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DSeid](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dseid/32/20194_2.png) [@DSeid](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DSeid)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 7:35pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/76 "2022-09-02T19:35:42Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> I’m ok with fake steampunk, as long as it’s faked in a way that _could_ be real. The LED filament bulbs could have been incandescent. The LEDs are just more efficient.

Trying to understand the concept. Isn’t most steampunk “fake”? (This seem to be your point with the _Galvanick Lucipher_.)

I was gathering that the concept was to have something meeting the functionalities we currently achieve with electricity and where that direction has led us, using gas and steam and chemical reactions instead? Where things would have gone if we did not go the electricity path? Mostly that’s not going to actually use gas and steam, but instead create a fantasy object that looks like it actually does or could. Even the _Galvanick Lucipher_ seems to be very slightly off. While it may have been realistic for the period it was the stream of development that led in our path, using a battery, rather than evolving technology without using electricity. Using LEDs in a design that looked as if it was a tube burning gas or gases interacting or chemical luminescence, preferably in a function NOT done in the era but done now, seems the ideal.

I mean bonus points if it actually functions using only gas and steam and chemical reactions, but that seems very hardcore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DPRK](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/4491bb/32.png) [@DPRK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DPRK)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 7:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/77 "2022-09-02T19:56:35Z")

</div>

So, you are suggesting, instead of a fake incandescent filament using LEDs, to fake a flame? I have seen fake candles that look sort of OK from a distance, so it is conceivable you could make a fake Argand or gas lamp with the right color and brightness.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Dr.Strangelove](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/dr.strangelove/32/6613_2.png) [@Dr.Strangelove](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Dr.Strangelove)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 8:21pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/78 "2022-09-02T20:21:41Z")

</div>

> [@DSeid](#):
>
> Isn’t most steampunk “fake”? (This seem to be your point with the _Galvanick Lucipher_.)

Strictly speaking, yes. But consider Babbage’s [Difference Engine](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Difference_engine). Babbage only designed it; he never built it. However, it _was_ ultimately built in 1991:  
[![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Difference_engine.JPG/1024px-Difference_engine.JPG) ](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/45/Difference_engine.JPG/1024px-Difference_engine.JPG)

It’s a gorgeous machine and works perfectly. The builders believe it could have been made in Babbage’s time as well, given funding.

The machine obviously fits within the Steampunk aesthetic. It is not literally Steampunk, since it’s not part of a genre of fiction… and yet it _does_ represent a divergence point for an alternate history where computers were available in the 19th century. And a plausible one, too, since the machine was functional.

We can take it a step further. This machine was possible, but what about further refinements? Surely, with more effort, they could have built far more sophisticated machines, ones with parts that are 1/10 the size and in a unit that is 10x the size (for a million times the capability). Perhaps the Victorians weren’t capable of that level of sophistication, but it’s hard to say it’s impossible.

As for the _Galvanick Lucipher_, all of the basic components were known in the 19th century–reflectors, arc lamps, chemical batteries, etc. It’s plausible in a very handwavey sense, though I’m fairly sure there is no chemistry they could have stumbled on that would have powered it quite like it was described. Stephenson describes it as using _aqua regia_, undoubtedly because he knew it’s a strong acid and because it has a very Victorian name, but not because it actually makes a good electrolyte in a battery. Maybe it does–I don’t know–but he picked it because it sounded good.

So while it’s clearly fictional, it’s nevertheless close to something that could be real. Using modern tech to bridge that gap while retaining the aesthetic is perfectly fine by me.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Mangetout](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/mangetout/32/19_2.png) [@Mangetout](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Mangetout)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 8:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/79 "2022-09-02T20:56:05Z")

</div>

> [@Dr.Strangelove](#):
>
> Regardless, gluing gears and shit to stuff doesn’t achieve this aesthetic. The artifacts are supposed to be _useful_ in some fashion, and at least something that might have happened (with allowance for the fact that this is all fictional).

This seems like it might be more of a statement about _poorly made_ things. A thing with gears and whatnot glued to it might be trying to be steampunk, but failing not because of definition, but rather quality and artistry. Like gluing electronic components to a thing as an attempt to make it ‘cyberpunk’, but failing because just gluing things to an object is _kitsch,_ pretty much regardless of the attempted style.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DocCathode](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/doccathode/32/18773_2.png) [@DocCathode](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DocCathode)\
**Post date:** [September 2, 2022, 9:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452/80 "2022-09-02T21:05:38Z")

</div>

I agree with the dread Consumer Of All. Steampunk covers a lot of area. I’ve seen a lot of badly made crap, and some beautiful and ingenious things.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452.md?page=3)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-want-to-have-a-steampunk-lamp-but-what-is-steampunk-anyway/970452.md?page=5)
