Except there are a lot of people in exactly this business. Any production that’s not being financed by a major studio (and there are plenty of them in L.A.) rents virtually all of its equipment, and it is all very expensive stuff. And every production I’ve been involved in myself has had a great, technically knowledgeable crew who knew how to treat that equipment with the necessary respect. I’m not really targetting Joe the Amateur Pornographer who wants to make a movie by himself in his basement, I’m targetting small student and independent productions. I would require that the DP come along to pick up the camera anyway to inspect and verify its condition, giving me a chance to meet him and gauge his level of experience/knowledge with the equipment.
Not only are there a myriad of rental houses such as I’ve been discussing but I have seen other individuals with the same idea advertising rental time of their personally-owned cameras. I know it’s possible. I know there’s risk involved, but I just need advice on how to make that risk as manageable as absolutely possible.
Yes, and that is done all the time here, although they are usually looking for the camera-bearer to double as DP (cinematographer). My only hesitation is that I do not really have the advanced knowledge of lighting and related film equipment (dollies etc.) necessary to be a DP. But if I warn them of that, and they’re still O.K. with me operating the camera, I’m all for it.