# I watch television, not look at it.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527>\
**Category:** Miscellaneous and Personal Stuff I Must Share\
**Created:** [August 5, 2007, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527 "2007-08-05T18:48:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mangeorge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d78d45/32.png) [@mangeorge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mangeorge)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 6:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/1 "2007-08-05T18:48:57Z")

</div>

Pretty much everyone I have known uses the term “watch” rather than “look at” TV. But it seems that people in other parts of the country says that they “look at” it. I come accross this when reading, and when watching the tube. In movies too.  
“John’s in the family room, looking at TV.”  
What do you say? Either way is right, I’m sure.  
Peace,  
mangeorge

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![neorxnawange](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/f4b2a3/32.png) [@neorxnawange](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/neorxnawange)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/2 "2007-08-05T18:52:09Z")

</div>

In TX we say “watch,” I’ve never heard anyone around here say “look at” unless they are talking about repairing the TV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harmonious\_Discord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/74df32/32.png) [@Harmonious\_Discord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonious_Discord)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 6:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/3 "2007-08-05T18:52:26Z")

</div>

I suppose if you can’t afford a working set you sit and look at it. I normally watch a program on the television.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 6:57pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/4 "2007-08-05T18:57:50Z")

</div>

For us it’s “watch” if we’re paying any attention at all. Otherwise, it’s just “TV is on” and maybe we won’t even be in the room with it. If we’re in the room we’re either “watching” or otherwise “listening” while focused elsewhere with our eyes. We don’t just “look at” TV unless we’re watching the video while listening to the audio of the same program on the radio. This latter activity is how we deal with Titans football games. The radio is much better than the TV so we split the experience between “looking at” the TV and listening to the radio.

I suppose the “looking at” applies when we’re listening to music on the stereo but have the picture on something with the volume muted on the TV. We do that every now and then, too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mangeorge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d78d45/32.png) [@mangeorge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mangeorge)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 7:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/5 "2007-08-05T19:24:46Z")

</div>

[Here](http://www.absolutvision.com/AbsolutVisionV2/gallery/characters/lifestyle_&_celebration/image/3F1071.php?back_url=search,1) Where it says “description”.  
Maybe it’s an east coast thing. I last came accross it reading a Stephen King story.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![if6was9](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e47c2d/32.png) [@if6was9](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/if6was9)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 7:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/6 "2007-08-05T19:51:50Z")

</div>

We say “watch” but I’ve heard “look at” too.  
A sidenote, my grandmother used to say davenport instead of couch. Go sit on the davenport. What’s up with that?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mangeorge](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/d78d45/32.png) [@mangeorge](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mangeorge)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 7:58pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/7 "2007-08-05T19:58:45Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=if6was9]  
We say “watch” but I’ve heard “look at” too.  
A sidenote, my grandmother used to say davenport instead of couch. Go sit on the davenport. What’s up with that?  
[/QUOTE]

My grandma said that too. Cute.  
Problem was, it took me up until about the 2nd grade to learn _not_ to call it that around my schoolmates. 😃

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![if6was9](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/e47c2d/32.png) [@if6was9](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/if6was9)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 8:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/8 "2007-08-05T20:06:34Z")

</div>

This thread just jogged that into my memory. Don’t know why. Anyways, it’s an old furniture company.

> **[Davenport (sofa)](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davenport_%28sofa%29)**
>
> Davenport was the name of a series of sofas made by the Massachusetts furniture manufacturer A. H. Davenport and Company, now defunct. Due to the popularity of the furniture at the time, the name davenport became a genericized trademark in parts of the United States.
> It is used as a synonym for "sofa" or "couch" in some Great Lakes regions of the United States, especially the Upper Midwest and Buffalo, NY–Erie, PA areas. It was used in the Adirondack Region and the Tug Hill Plateau amongst those...

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HazelNutCoffee](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@HazelNutCoffee](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HazelNutCoffee)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 8:07pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/9 "2007-08-05T20:07:39Z")

</div>

The difference between “watch” and “look at” is something I go over with almost every ESL class I have. Watching is something you do over an extended period - usually whatever you’re focusing on is in motion. Looking at is usually briefer and the object of your gaze is static. I’ve never heard anyone say “look at TV” instead of “watch TV,” unless it’s in class. In which case I correct them.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Harmonious\_Discord](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/74df32/32.png) [@Harmonious\_Discord](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Harmonious_Discord)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 8:24pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/10 "2007-08-05T20:24:42Z")

</div>

Davenport was something the persons we knew in Wisconsin and Iowa would call the coach. There’s a Davenport Iowa too.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BiblioCat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/ed8c4c/32.png) [@BiblioCat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BiblioCat)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 9:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/11 "2007-08-05T21:09:15Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=if6was9]  
A sidenote, my grandmother used to say davenport instead of couch. Go sit on the davenport. What’s up with that?  
[/QUOTE]

My grandmother always said ‘davenport.’ too.  
FWIW, she also said ‘look at television’ rather than ‘watch TV.’  
Not an East Coast thing; she was born and raised in the Midwest.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Zeldar](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/z/b77776/32.png) [@Zeldar](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Zeldar)\
**Post date:** [August 5, 2007, 9:23pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/12 "2007-08-05T21:23:51Z")

</div>

It has occurred to me that in olden days, college let’s say, we used to “stare at the tube” or “gaze into the idiot box” instead of “watching TV.” I suppose those are sort of like “looking at” TV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Little\_Nemo](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/little_nemo/32/3120_2.png) [@Little\_Nemo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Little_Nemo)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 3:40am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/13 "2007-08-06T03:40:57Z")

</div>

New York here. I’ve never heard it called anything but watching the TV.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dnooman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/839c29/32.png) [@dnooman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/dnooman)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 3:49am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/14 "2007-08-06T03:49:06Z")

</div>

I’ve heard people say “look at TV” but only while watching _Cops_, that should say something. To me it sounds ignorant for some reason. Kind of like when my friend’s Grandfather asked him if he was going to “pick up” weights. It’s usually called lifting. Meh, to each his own I guess.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WotNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e19b73/32.png) [@WotNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WotNot)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 8:03am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/15 "2007-08-06T08:03:57Z")

</div>

“Time has convinced me of one thing: Television is for appearing on - not for looking at”  
Noël Coward

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ParentalAdvisory](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/53a042/32.png) [@ParentalAdvisory](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ParentalAdvisory)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 8:23am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/16 "2007-08-06T08:23:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=dnooman]  
I’ve heard people say “look at TV”…  
[/QUOTE]  
“Look at TV” doesn’t sound right, _at all_. And I can’t imagine location demographics are at play, a high school diploma might be though. “Looking at the TV” sounds better. Still weird, but 200% better. The former sounds like something an eight year old would say.

“Whatcha doin’ son?”  
“I looking at TV daddy!”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![cochrane](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/cochrane/32/10441_2.png) [@cochrane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/cochrane)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 10:13am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/17 "2007-08-06T10:13:00Z")

</div>

If I’m sitting on my couch focusing on the TV, I’m “watching it.” If I’m sitting at my computer with the TV on and something catches my ear, I’ll glance at the TV to see if it’s interesting. In that case, I’m “looking” at it, since I’m only half-assedly paying attention to it and am likely to return my attention to my PC in a couple of minutes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![AWB](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/bb73d2/32.png) [@AWB](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/AWB)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 10:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/18 "2007-08-06T10:39:03Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=mangeorge]  
[Here](http://www.absolutvision.com/AbsolutVisionV2/gallery/characters/lifestyle_&_celebration/image/3F1071.php?back_url=search,1) Where it says “description”.  
Maybe it’s an east coast thing. I last came accross it reading a Stephen King story.  
[/QUOTE]

From link:

> [@](#):
>
> Description: Two teenagers girl looking at TV

From the rest of the description, I’d say this copy was written by someone in Engrish, not English.

Never heard of “looking” at a TV unless it was to repair it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![WotNot](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/e19b73/32.png) [@WotNot](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/WotNot)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 1:14pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/19 "2007-08-06T13:14:43Z")

</div>

I haven’t actively researched this, but based on my reading of a haphazard selection of old books, magazine articles etc, my impression is that in the early days of TV there was some uncertainty about which verb to use for TV consumption: did one watch it, look at it, view it … or should there be an entirely new word coined?

For a while there seems to have been more or less free variation – some preferred one term, others, another. “Watching” is what most of us do nowadays (but I notice that we’re considered to be “viewers” rather than “watchers”) – but it’s no surprise that one of the less popular options is still used by a minority.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tdn](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/94ad74/32.png) [@tdn](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/tdn)\
**Post date:** [August 6, 2007, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527/20 "2007-08-06T13:22:25Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Harmonious Discord]  
There’s a Davenport Iowa too.  
[/QUOTE]

My grandparents called their sofa a davenport. And they lived in Davenport. The street I was born on (not literally) was Douglas Court. My middle name is Douglas.

I was a confused child.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-watch-television-not-look-at-it/414527.md?page=2)
