# I will never, ever understand my fellow man.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [October 2, 2006, 4:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993 "2006-10-02T16:38:14Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Coin](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/779978/32.png) [@Coin](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Coin)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 9:58am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/221 "2006-10-04T09:58:53Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=thirdwarning]  
If she attacked him, with the weapons at her disposal, like teeth and nails, you’d have motherless children, if you had any children at all.  
[/QUOTE]

Two comments:

If CrafterMan`s wife had a handgun AND plenty of training AND she had time to access it, this situation would shift in her favor considerably. (Mind you, Crazy Gunman isn`t going to order her out of the house. He`d bind and gag her at the VERY least, wouldn`t he?)

If she tries to attack a large, armed male only with teeth and nails, I wouldn`t bet much money on her continuing to live long enough to even give the children extra time to escape, maybe not long enough to actually land a blow. Your wife`s bravery is admirable, CrafterMan, and I suspect many mothers would feel as she does, but she`d basically be committing suicide to little purpose.

I guess what I want to say is:

A: I feel people ought to be allowed to have all the guns they want IF they take an assload of training in their proper usage and don`t have any felonies or violent misdemeanors on their record. An untrained gun owner is better off unarmed.

B: This internet cowboy shit fails to impress. Attacking a gunman with bare hands is just dumb as hell unless you`re Internet Meme Chuck Norris, and none of us here are.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 10:47am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/222 "2006-10-04T10:47:05Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Coin]  
If she tries to attack a large, armed male only with teeth and nails, I wouldn`t bet much money on her continuing to live long enough to even give the children extra time to escape, maybe not long enough to actually land a blow. Your wife`s bravery is admirable, CrafterMan, and I suspect many mothers would feel as she does, but she`d basically be committing suicide to little purpose.  
[/QUOTE]  
Look, if I were one of the adults in that schoolhouse, I would \*not \* have been a sheep and left. I don’t care how many guns the guy had or how intimidating he was. I don’t care how much the odds were stacked against me. I would have reasoned that there was a strong likelihood the guy would murder someone, and I would do everything and anything in an attempt to stop him. Might I die in the process? Of course. But I would not be able to live with myself if I obeyed his order, left the schoolhouse, and the girls ended up being murdered.

Do you have children? Lets say you’re unarmed, and a bad guy breaks into your house. He is heavily armed, and orders you out of the house. He instructs your children to stay. There is every indication that he intends to harm your children. Would you say to yourself, “Gosh, if I try to stop him, I might not succeed. So I had better leave.” 99% of parents wouldn’t think twice about attacking the guy. Perhaps you’re part of the 1% who would leave.

It is apparent the adults who were in the schoolhouse did not even attempt to stop the guy. I predict they will feel immense guilt the rest of their lives. As they should.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 10:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/223 "2006-10-04T10:54:20Z")

</div>

**CarnalK** : You’re being a jerk. Seriously. \*\*SenorBeef \*\* has put a lot of effort in an attempt to engage in a rational, intelligent debate with you, and you respond by being a sophomoric jerk.

**SenorBeef** : My advice is to not waste your time arguing with people like **CarnalK**. If you’re willing to put that much time & effort into a rational debate, do it with someone who understands and appreciates your efforts, and has the brain power to offer intelligent retorts.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catsix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e19b73/32.png) [@catsix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/catsix)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 11:01am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/224 "2006-10-04T11:01:45Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> **E-Sabbath** said:  
> … So, does anyone have any _other_ constructive solutions on how to stop the exceptionally low-probability whackjob who goes off his nut and picks a school to kill people in? Columbine could have been stopped with social counseling… maybe.
> 
> This one’s harder.

I think the big problem, and the reason so many people are jumping on the gun issue, is that you can’t stop every whackjob. As long as there is society there will be members of it who act violently towards other members of it. We’ll never prevent every murder, nor every mass murder. Times like these serve to remind people that we are not entirely, 100% safe from harm. The easiest way to push those feelings aside is to find some inanimate scapegoat that can’t fight back and attempt to ban it.

> [@](#):
>
> **glee** said:  
> Yes, there is some drug-related gun crime here. Mainly criminals killing each other.  
> Far less gun homicides than in the US.

And in the US, most of those homicides are criminals killing each other. Typically either rival drug dealers or rival gangs are killing their competition.

> [@](#):
>
> Dunblane was 10 years ago. It shocked the UK, since there were so few school shootings here.

We have very few school shootings here when you consider the number of schools and the size of the US. It just seems like a bigger problem than it is because of the media. Remember the ‘Summer of the Shark’? There were no more attacks that year than any other on record, but it was a slow news summer so the media had to create something in order to get ratings…

> [@](#):
>
> **Excalibre** said:  
> No, dear. I said that it made sense to guess that an environment in which there are more guns is liable to have more gun violence than one with less of them.

But as a matter of **fact** for the last twenty years in the United States, that has not been true.

> [@](#):
>
> Imagine, for instance, a world with no guns at all. Gun violence would likely be significantly lower, wouldn’t it? I certainly didn’t say you could draw a perfect correlation between the two.

And you were chastising gun owners for living in fantasy land.

> [@](#):
>
> **Coin** said:  
> If she tries to attack a large, armed male only with teeth and nails, I wouldn`t bet much money on her continuing to live long enough to even give the children extra time to escape, maybe not long enough to actually land a blow. Your wife`s bravery is admirable, CrafterMan, and I suspect many mothers would feel as she does, but she`d basically be committing suicide to little purpose.

I bit a mugger who put a knife to my ribs. It worked, but I had to be a hell of a lot closer to the mugger than I wanted to be. I would very much prefer to have had my gun with me. If the bite had angered the mugger, I probably wouldn’t be around.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 11:44am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/225 "2006-10-04T11:44:38Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> I feel people ought to be allowed to have all the guns they want IF they take an assload of training in their proper usage and don`t have any felonies or violent misdemeanors on their record. An untrained gun owner is better off unarmed.

That’s like saying people are allowed to assemble \*only \* if they receive training on how to do so “peacefully,” and only if they’re not felons.

Want my opinion? The right to keep and bear arms is an inalienable _right_. Unless the person is in jail, he/she has the \*right \* to keep and bear arms. _ **Period** _. Including felons.

> [@](#):
>
> Attacking a gunman with bare hands is just dumb as hell unless you`re Internet Meme Chuck Norris, and none of us here are.

Depends on the circumstance. If I were a teacher, and a gunman burst into my school room and ordered me to leave, I would do everything possible to stop him. Most people would do the same.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Rilchiam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/2bfe46/32.png) [@Rilchiam](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Rilchiam)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 12:12pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/226 "2006-10-04T12:12:57Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=SenorBeef]  
I want to reiterate - this has become pretty much a generic gun control thread, of the sort where we’ve had detailed arguments over the various issues on the board many many times. I suggest doing a search, in GD, for “gun” in the title, so we don’t have to rehash everything that’s been pretty well covered. Happy reading.  
[/QUOTE]

'Cept you can’t do a search for “gun”, because it’s a three-letter word. Maybe “shooting” or “armed”?

**glee** , it’s the **safe** that’s [biometric](http://www.biometricsdirect.com/fingerprintsafe.htm), not the gun. A biometric safe can only be used by the person whose thumbprint it recognizes.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Odds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/d_odds/32/2882_2.png) [@D\_Odds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Odds)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 12:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/227 "2006-10-04T12:53:07Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=catsix]  
Why?

I mean if I really meant to go on a major shooting spree, I wouldn’t be packing a legal concealed pistol.  
[/QUOTE]  
Because I don’t trust an armed populace to use firearms responsibly. I’m not talking about any specific individual, but the more people who are armed, the more likely conflicts are to end up with shots fired. I don’t like guns and I don’t trust people. I know that we can’t put the cat back in the bag, regarding the proliferation of guns, but I don’t believe the best solution is arming more people. People aren’t responsible, and I believe it’s foolish to think that putting more weapons in the hands of more irresponsible people, legally or not, is the right solution.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catsix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e19b73/32.png) [@catsix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/catsix)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 1:22pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/228 "2006-10-04T13:22:27Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> **D\_Odds** said:  
> Because I don’t trust an armed populace to use firearms responsibly. I’m not talking about any specific individual, but the more people who are armed, the more likely conflicts are to end up with shots fired.

Can you point to one state which has enacted concealed carry in which this has actually happened?

The truth of the matter is that there are millions of people who legally carry concealed every day, and you have no idea who we are. You’ve passed them on the sidewalk, seen them in a store, talked to them in a park, perhaps even flipped them off in traffic.

I carry concealed on a fairly regular basis, and the people I encounter as I go about my business have absolutely no idea that I’ve got a pistol under my jacket. That’s the point of concealment. Do I get angry at people who cut me off in traffic or ram into me with a grocery cart? Sure I do. Have I ever had the actual urge to pull the pistol out and shoot them? No.

Carrying a firearm is a great responsibility, and it’s something that I don’t take lightly at all. That firearm is for defense of **my life or the life of another person only** , and I think you’d be hard pressed to find someone who carries and disagrees with that statement.

Let me ask you this:

If you were carrying a pistol concealed and someone cut you off in traffic, would you pull it out and shoot them?

No?

Then why would we?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 1:39pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/229 "2006-10-04T13:39:56Z")

</div>

**D\_Odds** : You appear to have a very negative and cynical view of your fellow man. “Everyone is untrustworthy unless proven otherwise.” Sad.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 1:53pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/230 "2006-10-04T13:53:18Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=D\_Odds]  
Because I don’t trust an armed populace to use firearms responsibly. I’m not talking about any specific individual, but the more people who are armed, the more likely conflicts are to end up with shots fired.  
[/QUOTE]

Too bad the statistics say different. See my previous post about states with “Shall Issue” laws. This argument doesn’t have anything to back it up other than your uninformed opinion. There are a lot of arguments for gun control that actually have some meat to them. I recommend you look for some of those, because this one’s useless.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Odds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/d_odds/32/2882_2.png) [@D\_Odds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Odds)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 2:01pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/231 "2006-10-04T14:01:58Z")

</div>

> [@catsix](#):
>
> The truth of the matter is that there are millions of people who legally carry concealed every day, and you have no idea who we are. You’ve passed them on the sidewalk, seen them in a store, talked to them in a park, perhaps even flipped them off in traffic.

Unlikely, as NYC doesn’t have (or has extremely limited) CCW laws. Although I’m sure that I’ve come across those illegally carrying. During a week working in Arizona, I had the joy of being around many open carry people. Not surprisingly, no one fired a shot anywhere near me while I was there. Doesn’t mean I wasn’t uncomfortable around all the firearms, nor did the lack of gunfire make me anymore comfortable.

> [@catsix](#):
>
> I carry concealed on a fairly regular basis, and the people I encounter as I go about my business have absolutely no idea that I’ve got a pistol under my jacket. That’s the point of concealment. Do I get angry at people who cut me off in traffic or ram into me with a grocery cart? Sure I do. Have I ever had the actual urge to pull the pistol out and shoot them? No.

Bully for you! Now if you can guarantee me that every idiot who takes great offense at minor transgression will make the same choice, that would be great.

> [@catsix](#):
>
> Carrying a firearm is a great responsibility, and it’s something that I don’t take lightly at all. That firearm is for defense of **my life or the life of another person only** , and I think you’d be hard pressed to find someone who carries and disagrees with that statement.

The first part is the way you handle yourself and your firearm ownership. The second part is wishful thinking. Many people carry for all the wrong reasons; they just don’t do it legally.

> [@catsix](#):
>
> If you were carrying a pistol concealed and someone cut you off in traffic, would you pull it out and shoot them?
> 
> No?
> 
> Then why would we?

I would **never** be carrying a pistol, legally or otherwise. On the other hand, I have been in my car with baseball bats, hockey sticks, cricket clubs and other weapons of convenience, which might have been used when we caught up in traffic. Like the majority of people, I don’t overreact to minor transgressions. Physically, at least - mentally, I’m pouring honey over them and staking them on top of a fire ant mound.

On the other hand, my mother had a driver jump out of his car and start banging on her window, because she would not turn right on red. Nevermind that there were numerous signs stating _No Right Turn on Red_ at the intersection, and that even if there weren’t, she’s well within her rights not to turn on red if she doesn’t feel it safe. The incident ended with no one harmed, when the idiot realized he was in the wrong. Can she trust, had he been armed, that he would not have used the gun threateningly, at a minimum? What if my mother had been armed? He was very threatening to her, and she was rightfully frightened. What if she used the firearm to protect herself. Do we assume that everyone owning a firearm will always use them at the right time and only when absolutely necessary?

I don’t like guns. I don’t trust people. I especially don’t trust people with guns (yes, this includes police officers).

On preview: **Crafter\_Man** , except for the last word, that is the first thing you’ve written in your thread that I’ve agreed with.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 2:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/232 "2006-10-04T14:06:49Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=D\_Odds]  
I especially don’t trust people with guns (yes, this includes police officers).  
[/QUOTE]  
I own lots of guns and lots of ammo. Am I automatically untrustworthy solely based on this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Odds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/d_odds/32/2882_2.png) [@D\_Odds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Odds)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/233 "2006-10-04T14:16:05Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=silenus]  
Too bad the statistics say different. See my previous post about states with “Shall Issue” laws. This argument doesn’t have anything to back it up other than your uninformed opinion. There are a lot of arguments for gun control that actually have some meat to them. I recommend you look for some of those, because this one’s useless.  
[/QUOTE]

I make no difference between legal and illegal ownership. I don’t like guns, I don’t want guns in my immediate vicinity, if it can be helped. That is why, if I were to learn that someone who is legally allowed to have a CCW shared my workplace (again, unlikely in NYC), I would see if my employer backed their right to be armed in the workplace or if my employer supported a gun-free workplace. I would make my decision on continuing to be employed based on that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![D\_Odds](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/d_odds/32/2882_2.png) [@D\_Odds](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/D_Odds)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 2:26pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/234 "2006-10-04T14:26:12Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=Crafter\_Man]  
I own lots of guns and lots of ammo. Am I automatically untrustworthy solely based on this?  
[/QUOTE]

**I** ’m less inclined to trust you, especially if that is all I know about you. I only speak for myself.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Crafter\_Man](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/crafter_man/32/458_2.png) [@Crafter\_Man](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Crafter_Man)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 2:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/235 "2006-10-04T14:50:16Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=D\_Odds]  
**I** ’m less inclined to trust you, especially if that is all I know about you.  
[/QUOTE]  
Fascinating. Can you explain why?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/236 "2006-10-04T16:11:10Z")

</div>

**SenorBeef** , I don’t think guns are evil and have no benefit. I just think that in general they are more harmful to society than beneficial. I fully accept that responsible owners can mitigate that harm, unconvinced that they significantly increase the benefits. The surveys used by your linked study are just that, surveys. They require gun owners to decide themselves how serious a crime they stopped indeed whether they anything happened at all. For instance:

> [@http://www.saf.org/LawReviews/KleckAndGertz1.htm](#):
>
> If one were committed to rejecting the seemingly overwhelming survey evidence on the frequency of DGU, one could speculate, albeit without any empirical foundation whatsoever, that nearly all of the people reporting such experiences are simply making them up. We feel this is implausible.

I also feel it’s implausible but not impossible, given that it is a survey of one side of a highly politicized issue. It’s a given that some are lying.

I admitted right up front that my Wisconsin data was a small set but if you can find me a larger data set from a reliable source (such as the CDC) that shows wildly different ratios I’ll be glad to see it and give a _mea culpa_.  
ps- looking through the data tables I find something peculiar: table 2 says that 46% of defensive gun uses were when there was no threat or attack towards the defender. WTF?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 4:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/237 "2006-10-04T16:44:32Z")

</div>

[QUOTE=CarnalK]  
I admitted right up front that my Wisconsin data was a small set but if you can find me a larger data set from a reliable source (such as the CDC) that shows wildly different ratios I’ll be glad to see it and give a _mea culpa_.  
[/QUOTE]

The CDC is hardly a reliable source, especially when it comes to areas outside of its mandate. They have repeatedly skewed data to match a political opinion in the past, and they continue to do so today.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![catsix](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/e19b73/32.png) [@catsix](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/catsix)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 4:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/238 "2006-10-04T16:59:29Z")

</div>

Yeah, asking the CDC for firearms information is rather like asking Alton Brown to fix my fucking toilet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 5:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/239 "2006-10-04T17:02:02Z")

</div>

So I guess we’ll just have to go with the NRA’s stats then. link?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CarnalK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/carnalk/32/486_2.png) [@CarnalK](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/CarnalK)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2006, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993/240 "2006-10-04T17:04:29Z")

</div>

To be less flip: give me a link to something you think is reliable that gives wildly different ratios than what I posted. I haven’t gotten into this gun merry-go-round debate but you gun owners clearly have, got anything bookmarked?

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993.md?page=11)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/i-will-never-ever-understand-my-fellow-man/374993.md?page=13)
