# IBM's POWER server line

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469>\
**Category:** Factual Questions\
**Created:** [March 23, 2010, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469 "2010-03-23T14:16:06Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 7\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlickRoenick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e68b1a/32.png) [@SlickRoenick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlickRoenick)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 2:16pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/1 "2010-03-23T14:16:06Z")

</div>

What is it about these POWER servers, [such as the 750 Express](http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/750/specs.html), that makes their hardware so much more expensive? When comparing specs with their [lesser servers](http://www-304.ibm.com/shop/americas/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/default/ProductDisplay?productId=4611686018426010077&storeId=1&langId=-1&categoryId=4611686018425279709&dualCurrId=73&catalogId=-840)i do see more performance, but not $35k more!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![astro](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/a/9dc877/32.png) [@astro](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/astro)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 2:44pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/2 "2010-03-23T14:44:21Z")

</div>

These appear to be utterly different machine classes. I’m not sure how you think there’s some valid apples to apples cost comparison here. It’s like cost comparing a car and a dump truck based on raw horsepower.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlickRoenick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e68b1a/32.png) [@SlickRoenick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlickRoenick)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 2:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/3 "2010-03-23T14:48:34Z")

</div>

Other than the POWER7 sockets, what else is different? DDR3 is DDR3 isn’t it? NICs are NICs, SCSI and SAS and USB are all universally followed “protocols” aren’t they?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![gotpasswords](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/g/c57346/32.png) [@gotpasswords](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/gotpasswords)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 3:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/4 "2010-03-23T15:29:44Z")

</div>

The POWER7 processors themselves are wildly expensive. Back in last September, systems using them were described as triple the price of ones with Intel Nehalem processors.

> [@The Inquirer](#):
>
> if the current trends are anything to watch, expect a Nehalem-EX to be at least 3 times cheaper than the POWER7 per total system CPU unit. I won’t be surprised to see an even larger price differential.

(from [http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/1532674/power7-vs-nehalem-ex](http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/review/1532674/power7-vs-nehalem-ex))

Aside from that, the POWER7 was designed for use in massively scalable supercomputers - the design was for all practical purposes commissioned by DARPA.

Comparing this to an i386 processor such as the Intel Nehalem inside your cheaper reference is like comparing a bicycle to a train. Yes, they both have wheels and yes, they both can carry people, but one can move a whole lot more and a whole lot faster, and it’s easy to add a car or two to a train to add capacity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SlickRoenick](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/e68b1a/32.png) [@SlickRoenick](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/SlickRoenick)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 3:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/5 "2010-03-23T15:40:04Z")

</div>

Reason i asked my upgrade from Tivoli 5.5 to 6.2 later this year. I “inherited” this project and found out that the IBM p520 is outdated so i was going to replace the server as well. I just poked around a little bit at the latest series of IBM servers and hence the question.

Regarding the x86 versus Power7 architecture:

> [@that article](#):
>
> Everything runs, all the vendors have to use it, and there’ll be a myriad of support chipsets, peripherals, software, drivers, apps, and of course every operating system out there, minus AIX and VMS

I just have to decide if i want to keep AIX 5.3 or move it to Linux or Windows. The p520 won’t run AIX 6, so there is a lot i need to consider. Thanks for the info.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKilez](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/e5b9ba/32.png) [@JKilez](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKilez)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 8:34pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/6 "2010-03-23T20:34:43Z")

</div>

> [@SlickRoenick](#):
>
> Other than the POWER7 sockets, what else is different? DDR3 is DDR3 isn’t it? NICs are NICs, SCSI and SAS and USB are all universally followed “protocols” aren’t they?

I think other people have already addressed most of the issues, but I can add something to this. It is not necessarily the end-points (NIC, PCI slot, etc) that make the difference, it is the interconnects. High-end server class systems will have dedicated buses and/or controllers for each of those I/O connections while lower-end systems will share them across multiple ports. This allows each connection to run at maximum capacity concurrently providing far greater aggregate throughput.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![RaftPeople](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/6f9a4e/32.png) [@RaftPeople](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/RaftPeople)\
**Post date:** [March 23, 2010, 10:00pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/ibms-power-server-line/533469/7 "2010-03-23T22:00:49Z")

</div>

> [@SlickRoenick](#):
>
> Reason i asked my upgrade from Tivoli 5.5 to 6.2 later this year. I “inherited” this project and found out that the IBM p520 is outdated so i was going to replace the server as well. I just poked around a little bit at the latest series of IBM servers and hence the question.
> 
> Regarding the x86 versus Power7 architecture:  
> I just have to decide if i want to keep AIX 5.3 or move it to Linux or Windows. The p520 won’t run AIX 6, so there is a lot i need to consider. Thanks for the info.

I’m guessing (based on age/size of p520, etc.) you could get by with the x86 box. If you need more power in the future, then the Power server will scale much better than x86 servers.
