Click-bait … the article actually disputes the claims in the headline.
However, Dr Spencer’s article “Global Warming 101” is very well written and the first five paragraphs clearly explains the actual physics going on. It then decays into shameless self-promotion but I guess somebody has to pay the web-hosting bill.
This is a subtle point, but all the damage and destruction from rising sea levels in the past 10,000 years is all currently … you know … underwater and not very well explored.
Why the focus on hurricanes hitting the USA? (I’ve seen the same insistence in earlier threads.) Of the two propositions “Hurricanes are getting stronger” and “Hurricanes are hitting the USA”, is it not clear that the former is the one relevant to the question?
BTW, although the Northern Atlantic may have been relatively calm the last few years, there were seven Category-4 or -5 hurricanes in the Eastern Pacific in 2014, the most since 1993.
To nitpick the nitpick: McEvedy and Jones estimate 4, 5, 7, 14, 27, 50, 170 as world population (in megapersons) for 10000, 5000, 4000, 3000, 2000, 1000, 0 BC respectively. Given these estimates, the effects of agriculture 2000 years ago would have dwarfed the effects during the Neolithic.