# Identify this romantic comedy

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424>\
**Category:** Cafe Society\
**Created:** [December 23, 2008, 8:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424 "2008-12-23T08:19:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tyrrell\_McAllister](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tyrrell_mcallister/32/16772_2.png) [@Tyrrell\_McAllister](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tyrrell_McAllister)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 8:19am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/1 "2008-12-23T08:19:21Z")

</div>

I don’t watch many romantic comedies, but I thought I saw one years ago in which the male lead pays some kids in a park to shoot the date of the female lead with squirt guns.

I had somehow gotten it into my head that this scene happened in _You’ve Got Mail_. As those more familiar with the genre will already know, no such scene appears in that film. So, where did I see it?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 8:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/2 "2008-12-23T08:20:25Z")

</div>

Addicted to Love. They shot him with perfume. 🙂

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TWDuke](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/e495f1/32.png) [@TWDuke](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TWDuke)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 8:24am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/3 "2008-12-23T08:24:53Z")

</div>

[Addicted to Love](http://splicedwire.com/97reviews/addicted.html)?

ETA: Or Rio by Duran Duran.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tyrrell\_McAllister](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tyrrell_mcallister/32/16772_2.png) [@Tyrrell\_McAllister](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tyrrell_McAllister)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 8:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/4 "2008-12-23T08:25:04Z")

</div>

Thanks, **Sage Rat**. I’d always remembered that scene as emblematic of all that is wrong with romantic comedies. But when I saw _You’ve Got Mail_ recently and didn’t see the scene, I started to worry that I’d made the whole thing up :).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sr\_Siete](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6de8d8/32.png) [@Sr\_Siete](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sr_Siete)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 9:08am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/5 "2008-12-23T09:08:49Z")

</div>

> [@Tyrrell\_McAllister](#):
>
> Thanks, **Sage Rat**. I’d always remembered that scene as emblematic of all that is wrong with romantic comedies.

Huh? “Addicted to love” is an excellent movie.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 9:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/6 "2008-12-23T09:18:31Z")

</div>

I wouldn’t say that Addicted to Love is a particularly good (or bad) romantic comedy, but indeed, I don’t see how this one scene is any better or worse than anything.

You’ve Got Mail sucked though. I’d recommend _Michael_ of Nora Ephron films.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sr\_Siete](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6de8d8/32.png) [@Sr\_Siete](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sr_Siete)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 9:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/7 "2008-12-23T09:30:34Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> I wouldn’t say that Addicted to Love is a particularly good (or bad) romantic comedy, but indeed, I don’t see how this one scene is any better or worse than anything.
> 
> You’ve Got Mail sucked though. I’d recommend _Michael_ of Nora Ephron films.

Really? You would be about the first one, then. Let me check…  
Well, 36% rotten at [Rottentomatoes.com](http://Rottentomatoes.com) is not that bad. I thought it was more universally hated.

“Addicted to love” is an underrated masterpiece, if it wasn’t by the lame main actors, Broderick and meg Ryan, it would be a classic:

_Maggie: When I was a kid, my father had this dog that started to get all weak and sickly. He takes it to the vet, he examines it and says a maggot must have laid eggs in the dog’s butt. The baby maggots have crawled up, now they’ve started to grow, and eventually they’re gonna eat the dog alive from the inside. He says it should be put to sleep, because it’s an old dog anyway. But father won’t do it. He takes the dog home, he puts it on the bed, he reaches up into the dog, picking out the maggots with his finger, one by one. It takes him all night, but he gets every last one. That dog outlived my father. That’s love, Sam._  
How can you not love that? This is good writing.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sage\_Rat](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/sage_rat/32/399_2.png) [@Sage\_Rat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sage_Rat)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 9:46am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/8 "2008-12-23T09:46:47Z")

</div>

Given that 99% of movies are \<40% on Rotten Tomatoes, I can’t say that bothers me. 😛

Yahoo Movies gives a B- for _Michael_ and B- to _Addicted to Love_.

The latter does have more interesting dialogue, but the romance seems pretty random. You don’t get the feeling like they were really interested in each other before deciding that they’re in love.

Matthew Broderick made an even more artsy romantic comedy named _The Night We Never Met_. You might like it if you like Addicted to Love.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![well\_he\_s\_back](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/w/3ab097/32.png) [@well\_he\_s\_back](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/well_he_s_back)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2008, 10:04am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/9 "2008-12-23T10:04:16Z")

</div>

Wait a minute - in the sadly overlooked 2002 comedy “Big Trouble” there is a scene with teen boy ambushing girl with water pistol as part of dare/high school game. Maybe that’s the movie the OP was thinking of?  
Or maybe my insomnia’s got the best of me. Anyway the movie’s hilarious.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Tyrrell\_McAllister](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/tyrrell_mcallister/32/16772_2.png) [@Tyrrell\_McAllister](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Tyrrell_McAllister)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2008, 12:12am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/10 "2008-12-24T00:12:29Z")

</div>

> [@Sage\_Rat](#):
>
> I wouldn’t say that Addicted to Love is a particularly good (or bad) romantic comedy, but indeed, I don’t see how this one scene is any better or worse than anything.

I hesitate now to judge too harshly, because my memory of the scene and its context is obviously not reliable. But I’ve always been irritated by movies that have a character acting in a childish, petty, and cruel fashion, with the clear intent that you, the viewer, find that behavior endearing. That scene, at least as I remember it, was a prime example of this. The scene was particularly egregious because of the twisted way that it incorporated the “Aw, he’s good with kids” trope that seems to appear in all romantic comedies.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nametag](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/nametag/32/406_2.png) [@Nametag](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nametag)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2008, 10:28am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/11 "2008-12-24T10:28:05Z")

</div>

_ATL_ isn’t exactly a romantic comedy, is it? I’ve always enjoyed what I thought was a deliberate and delightful spoofing of the conventions of that genre. Almost all romantic comedies involve behavior that in real life would be frightening and obsessive – _ATL_ just runs with it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Bryan\_Ekers](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/bryan_ekers/32/183_2.png) [@Bryan\_Ekers](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Bryan_Ekers)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2008, 11:18am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/12 "2008-12-24T11:18:18Z")

</div>

I remember watching _Secretary_ which was supposed to be innovative and surprising for its bondage and S&M themes, and realizing it was hitting all the romcom formula points.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Alessan](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/alessan/32/465_2.png) [@Alessan](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Alessan)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2008, 11:45am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/13 "2008-12-24T11:45:05Z")

</div>

Hey, S&M freaks need love, too!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sr\_Siete](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/6de8d8/32.png) [@Sr\_Siete](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sr_Siete)\
**Post date:** [December 24, 2008, 12:20pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/identify-this-romantic-comedy/478424/14 "2008-12-24T12:20:46Z")

</div>

> [@Tyrrell\_McAllister](#):
>
> I hesitate now to judge too harshly, because my memory of the scene and its context is obviously not reliable. But I’ve always been irritated by movies that have a character acting in a childish, petty, and cruel fashion, with the clear intent that you, the viewer, find that behavior endearing.

I disagree. I believe that you (the viewer) should have felt their behaviour as obsessive, petty, unfair and ultimately self-destructive.
