You tried to point to 6 deaths per year in Christmas Tree fires as some huge number, but probably a hundred million Christmas trees are used every year for on average, what, 6 weeks? How does that compare to, I don’t know, fireworks deaths or driving deaths from extra travel on Memorial day? It seems like it’d be pretty in line with other holiday-related random deaths. I would suspect leaving a heating plate unattended has a per-hour fatality rate somewhere in the area of 1000-10,000 times more than Christmas trees. Additionally, people are using Christmas trees for their intended purpose, more or less, whereas anyone with the slightest bit of common sense would realize that leaving something hot and cheap and electrical and designed for uses in short bursts on, unattended for 12+ hours is a really fucking awful idea.
I do wonder how many fatalities or significant injuries we could attribute per year to Sabbath related issues. There are probably a thousand unique ways in which Sabbath limitations and preparations could kill people, so it would be excessively difficult to pin a number on it.
And don’t get me wrong - the Sabbath rules are silly regardless of whether or not they kill anyone. We can evaluate how silly various religious practices are. I’m not saying that this one incident proves that it’s a stupid practice.
The premise is that everyone has a forced day of rest, and yet the extreme limitations put upon it make it so that you do signifcantly more work preparing for it than you would if you could simply do normal activities. Not being able to sort through your clothes to pick out an outfit isn’t restful, it’s just incredibly annoying. Not being able to open your doors, having to potentially contact and pay someone to come turn your laundry machine on or change the channel on your tv - having to plan your meals around both being unable to operate any devices and also not being able to seperate food items - there are countless little things like this. If the intention is for people to rest, then it’s obviously really fucking stupid and counterproductive since a whole lot of work goes into it. A rule like “at least one day a week you cannot do employment-related work or other hard labor” would seem reasonable. “Completely change your life around and make it a complete pain in the ass because you need to rest!” is not.
Religious practices can be more or less silly than others. Going to church/temple/mosque every week is pretty reasonable. You’d want to stay in touch with your fellow believers, you’d want to learn more about your religion, and whatever other functions your holy place serves. So it’s totally reasonable to me that religions would have places where people congregate regularly. On the other hand magic underwear, e-meters, exorcism, refusing blood transfusions - I’m just talking about common stuff that’s still around - not even the crazy old testament shit that even devout religious people find too evil or absurd to continue.
“Work hard to set up and live awkwardly as shit on your rest day” is a fairly silly practice. But not as silly as the ridiculous “I trick god with a string! Oh, it’s okay if I make a meal on a hot plate as long as I don’t press the power button!” style of rules lawyering on top of that. If you’re going to come up with absurd workarounds then just discard the whole damn thing anyway. Working yourself into ridiculous contortions to comply in a non-genuine way with arbitrary religious beliefs that could be discarded is silly. When it burns 7 kids to death, well, that makes it more sad than silly for a while. But it’s silly and mockable and shitty even if it didn’t.
I want to clear something up - Jews are pretty awesome. As far as religious people go, they don’t proselytize, they tend not to go to holy war, they tend to make good citizens. I would expect the average Jew was considerably ahead of the average non-Jew on useful metrics like crime rate and such.
But even so, their beliefs are based on a bunch of magic and shit that a bunch of goatherders made up thousands of years ago. Nothing about their beliefs deserves respect, except that if it’s a laudable belief anyway, like prohibitions on murder or theft. But then we don’t need magic to know that. So yes, their religious beliefs are idiotic, as are all religious beliefs, and any cultural trends that stem from those religious beliefs are equally tainted.
Christmas Trees are a poor comparison in the US because, as I explained before, the Christmas tree isn’t even codified in Christian dogma. It doesn’t serve any real religious role. It’s something they co-opted to try to steal someone else’s holiday hundreds of years after the Bible was written. And it has been taken back as a secular tradition in the same regard as lots and lots of the people who use them as holiday theming aren’t even religiously Christian. As far as silly beliefs go, having a tree during a certain season and a holiday festivity is way lower on the list than having 1/7th of your life completely fucked for silly, counterproductive reasons. The 7 deaths in this example are some minor icing on the “religion wasting the shit out of people’s time” cake.
Not that I really care - if you want to say it’s stupid to have a Christmas tree because you have somewhere around a 1 in 25,000,000 chance of dying from it - eh, so be it, it’s simple risk assessment vs enjoyment in that case. There’s nothing inherently contradictory, restrictive, forced, or counterproductive in voluntarily using Christmas trees in the same way there is in obeying the Sabbath and all of the silly workaround rules.
I may have clouded my motivation here by appealing to your knowledge of epidemiology - I merely wanted to show what a poor comparison Christmas trees were to Sabbath hot plates. My concern on this issue isn’t because Sabbath hotplates are killing millions of people, but when something that’s really fucking stupid on its own ends up killing people, it’s that much more tragic.
Let me try another analogy - I bet Catholic priests sometimes do hardcore shit during exorcisms that kills the person. If an exorcist killed a little mentally ill girl during the exorcism, I would both mock the ridiculous stone age shit that people believe, and it would be tragic because such silly beliefs lead to someone dying. Would you then come in telling me that hey, Christmas trees kill people too, and if I don’t get just as outraged about Christmas trees as I do about exorcisms, I’m a hypocrite? Would you be rushing to talk about how the exorcism related death wasn’t related to Catholicism at all, it’s just the priest making an individual, routine decision to shake her independent of his religion?
Nothing I’ve said has anything to do with beliefs being stupid because they’re minority. In fact, I’ve obviously contradicted such a notion since I’m very critical of the harm that stupid Christian beliefs can do. They are, in fact, the ones that most threaten my life because of Christian political dominance in the US. If your mischaracterization were remotely true, then I’d be fine with mainstream Christian practices, right?