If a blind person could suddenly see would the visual world make sense or not?

I wonder why there seem to be some many questions about blind people on here?

One thing not being considered too much is that if organs aren’t used they can atrophy.

In the 1999 film At First Sight Val Kilmer played a man who had blind since the age of three and went through a great struggle to adjust after having his sight restored. In particular he had difficulty comprehending distance and perspective. This was said to be based on a true story.

C. S. Lewis wrote a gloomy short story on the subject. He said he was inspired by the cryptic passage in the Gospels where Jesus restores sight to a man born blind who, when asked what he sees, responds “men as trees, walking”.

There was an excellent recent BBC documentary “The Man Who Learned to See” following a guy called Mike May who’d lost his sight as a child, but was getting it restored as an adult. Coping with trying to make sense of his new (still limited) capabilities was clearly a difficult process and all those involved seemed to accept that the obstacles were such that they had to feel ambiguous about the treatment. As I recall, Oliver Sacks was one of the interviewees.
There are some info and links by and about him available.

This MSNBC article may be of interest to those who read this thread previously as it is directly on point with respect to the questions raised by the OP.

Man’s vision gives insight on seeing - Procedure that restored vision after blindness gives clues — After 43 years of blindness, Michael May can see again

Part of long article.

Apparently credit is actually due bonzer who, on review, gave this same story through another source in the link just before mine.:o

Coincidentally, I was reminded of making that same post yesterday by an article about him in the Independent by the novelist Lisa Appignanesi. I didn’t think it was quite worth resurrecting the thread for, but since that’s been done anyway: here’s the link to it.