# If declaring national emergencies becomes a thing, what kinds of NEs could the democrats do

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-declaring-national-emergencies-becomes-a-thing-what-kinds-of-nes-could-the-democrats-do/829664>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 16, 2019, 1:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-declaring-national-emergencies-becomes-a-thing-what-kinds-of-nes-could-the-democrats-do/829664 "2019-02-16T13:51:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 30

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HurricaneDitka](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/96bed5/32.png) [@HurricaneDitka](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/HurricaneDitka)\
**Post date:** [February 16, 2019, 6:47pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-declaring-national-emergencies-becomes-a-thing-what-kinds-of-nes-could-the-democrats-do/829664/30 "2019-02-16T18:47:10Z")

</div>

> [@GIGObuster](#):
>
> That is nice, a nice straw man, but thank you for playing. …

And it’s not a straw man. I’m not the one inventing arguments about banning guns or shutting down manufacturers / FFLs. That was **Bryan Ekers** and **jasg** (if I understood him correctly), with perhaps some vague delusional assistance from Nancy:

> [@Bryan\_Ekers](#):
>
> Well, in that case, let the future Dem ban guns or whatever. It’s all nice and legal.

> [@jasg](#):
>
> … With the same justification, one could eliminate the direct economic contribution of civilian arms manufacture and sales.

---

_[View the full topic](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-declaring-national-emergencies-becomes-a-thing-what-kinds-of-nes-could-the-democrats-do/829664)._
