Pubic hair?!? Do you mean that literally?
I haven’t encountered enough of these low-rise jeans to run into that particular surprise. I would think their underwear, even thongs, would cover it. Plus, I get the impression that many women are trimming their pubic hair to the point that there wouldn’t be much to see.
I’m just trying to understand the mechanics of jeans low enough to flash pubic hair.
I agree with Jodi who says
I own four pair of low rise pants, and they’re not my favorite. I’m afraid to bend over in them, and while I’m not fat, my hips are not tiny and birthing two children has left me stretch marks just below my navel that I don’t care to advertise. I bought the pants because I loved everything else about them except the rise. I have several long shirts that I wear with them.
Last week, I decided I was in need of a pair of new jeans. I went into a large jean shop and asked for a pair of jeans that are flare, but not low rise. Her response “There are none”. She finally selected me a jean (I think it’s a boot cut) that suited me fine. Yesterday, I tried another store. “Do you have any jeans that aren’t low rise?” He showed me a pair “Just got them in today.” Rejoice ladies. (They were flare, but a little snug for my comfort.)
Sure I’m getting a little old (29), and I’m not the thinnest person in the world, but that shouldn’t forbid me from having a few trendy clothes.
(I’ll get Dinsdale to start coming to my church yet!)
We had a baptism today and a member of the party had a skirt that rode so low I wondered if she had her ass crack spackled.
You atheists miss out on so much. 
I haven’t actually seen frontal pubic hair yet, but…
A couple of months ago, I was sitting on a bench in Madison, NJ. Two young women walked by wearing super-low-rise pants. As they passed, I saw that they both were sporting very visible thong underpants. The effect was somewhat ruined by the fact that one of them had a prodigious amount of ass-crack hair sticking out from under the thong.
Yeah, Clark, I’ve seen a few people running around in pants so low I could see the top of the pubic bone, so I can only assume that the wearers had waxed beforehand. They’re, umm, interesting.
Way, way, WAY too much information there my friend. 
I have seen this once in Ireland, too. Low-rise just that little bit too low (like, 5mm), and either no undies on beneath, or they’d slipped too, revealing a line of pubes.
And the other day in Dublin I saw a girl walking down the street with low-rise pants on that were hanging below her ass. She was holding the pants at that level with one hand (she was wearing boxer shorts underneath). Bizarre.
I firmly, firmly, firmly believe that the majority of people look best either mostly covered up or stark naked. It’s the consciously sexy looks that ruin most.
I have a question for all the guys here who claim to appreciate young women who show their butt to the world.
I’m female. If I were between 16 and 23, and lacked an SO, would wearing that stuff be a way for me to get dates?
Oh, for sure, you’d get hit on and propositioned like crazy - indeed you’d get asked out left right and centre. But you could also safely assume that 98% of the propositions would be with a view to bonking your brains out.
Conversely, if you were to dress in a far more tasteful, and classy kinda way, you’ll get asked out just as much - but you’ll be sending a different signal, and the guys who approach you, will by and large, be classier too.
Okay. Just wanted to know what kind of guys are out there nowadays.
Good job.
Should I ever get soft in the head to the point that I let my little daughter dress like that, I hope someone will take pity on me and put me out of my misery.
Freaking garbage the designers want to sell. God damned slit up the side miniskirts for 5 year old kids… grumble grumble.
Alas, this seems to be my complaint about the new low-rise trend: Not enough size 6 or smaller women wearing the damn things! If I see one more size 10+ woman/girl smashed into a size 6 or smaller low rise jean causing all excess fat to squash upward and outward I may just stop going out in public and save myself the stomach retching! It is worsened when combined with the ultra-tight belly shirt phenomenon. The combination results in a bulging ring around the mid-section that truly meets the age-old definition of a “spare tire” about the midsection.
MeanJoe - Probably about to be flamed but it’s okay.
So there are guys here that are actually complaining about seeing a nice young women’s tummy and ass?
I think you guys a getting a little old. 
I happen to enjoy the style on a good looking, athletic type body, early 20’s (OK, even late teens) woman.
you’re getting pubes? I’m in dallas and have yet to be introduced. Please tell me where.
Every time I see guys wearing that, I want to yell out, “Your pants are too high & tight!!”
Just to screw with 'em.
I hated the low-rise style when it first came out, but now I think the moderate low-rises look good.
Hehe, I’m 29 and when I put on my low rise pants and look in the mirror I’m quite pleased with what I see.
My complaint is that they need to make some low rise thongs to wear, as I am NOT going out with my undies hanging out. I’m very particular about these things.
I’ve seen several different designs of jeans that aren’t low rise. Express has regular jeans, that I know for sure. I’ve never had a problem finding different varietys.
I just had the weirdest flashback.
I’m in Sears with my mom circa 1982 (I’d be about 11) and I see those sweaters that were all the rage at the time: white or black with a rainbow going from one wrist, across the chest, then down to the other wrist.
Mom: “Those are cute.”
Me: “I want the black one!”
Mom: “You can’t have it. It’s not appropriate for little girls to wear black.”
Yeah I groused about it at the time (and it seems almost Victorian now!), but jeez…was that so hard? Why can’t a parent say “It’s not appropriate for a little girl to wear a backless halter top, leopard-print mini-skirt and high-heel hooker sandals”? Hell, it’s not appropriate for ADULTS to wear that for the most part.
Re: the pubic hair/thongs showing.
I was at the SF Giants game a couple weeks ago and some woman sitting in front of us was wearing low-rise jeans WITH THE WAISTBAND CUT OFF, a thong that was apparently a square of lace in the front connected to the back by a thin string (which nicely divided her flab into distinct rolls), and (what I can only assume was supposed to be a belt) some sort of stretchy scarflike piece of fabric halfway between her knees and waist. (!!!) After a bit she and her husband/date/pimp (?) realised they were in the wrong seats and got up and left. My husband sorta screwed up his face and said “What the? Why??! But…I. Um. Don’t understand?!?”
Bwa, ha ha, ha huh, huh, cough! I call 'em “Back Boobs”. They actually occur at two levels, the lower, which you described, and the upper, which are created when a chubby lady wears a bra at least two sizes too small.