President Bush heard that two Brazilian soldiers were killed in Iraq. In shock and disbelief, the grieving president held his head in his hands and asked “How many in a brazillion?”
Sorry.
Not really.
President Bush heard that two Brazilian soldiers were killed in Iraq. In shock and disbelief, the grieving president held his head in his hands and asked “How many in a brazillion?”
Sorry.
Not really.
Hadn’t found that earlier thread; thanks. So, if we accept Clarke’s monolith-driven deus ex machina, how long could Lucifer sustain fusion?
.
Since the whole enterprise would require, if I may borrow a phrase from Clarke, a technology indistinguishable from magic, it’s impossible to say.
Stranger
Didn’t 3001 postulate that Lucifer was already starting to run out of energy, a mere thousand years after it was created?
I’ve never read 3001, but if so, that was a piss-poor design. The idea was to give the Europans the opportunity to evolve to sentience, and there’s no way a mere millenium would be enough for that.
Well see, you do this trick with a humming monolith while playing Also Sprach Zarathustra just as the sun is about ready to rise…
I’m guessing that the Monolith Builders had a regime change, though, and the budget line item for “Sustainment and Maintanence, Lucifer, Sol, Milky Way Galaxy, Virgo Supercluster” got axed as part of a deal to get more funding for Kerr Metric subsidies.
Stranger
Upon further investigation, it appears that Clarke has deliberately employed retroactive continuity, saying that each novel is a separate “alternate-timeline” version of events. The story versions are inconsistant. In 2010: Odyssey Two, the epilogue states that Lucifer is still burning in 20,001 AD, while 2061: Odyssey Three states that Lucifer is burning out in 3001 AD.