Well, we’re talking about ‘in court,’ so…
There are limits as to what kind of subterfuge can be used set by various caselaw. It would be hard to make a quick definitive article about it since various state cases can also effect it and that makes it 50 slightly different standards.
I see that but ignorance is traditionally no defense for breaking the law. If you lie in court you’re guilty of perjury, oath or no oath. An oath is simply a reminder not to lie but if you didn’t take one you could surely still be convicted of perjury? In other words it would be unnecessary to show that the accused knew that it was a crime.
This reminds me of a bit in Dragnet when Sergeant Friday was questioning an uncooperative person of interest, and the person kept just naming state capitals. “Where were you last night?” “The capital of Nebraska is Lincoln.” “How did you know the victim?” “The capital of Mississippi is Jackson.” “Do you own a gun?” “The capital of Nevada is Las Vegas.” “Okay, we’ll be back in touch later… but one other thing.” “Yeah?” “The capital of Nevada… is Carson City.”
Then I’m picturing Friday shoving him up against the wall and arresting him for lying about the capital of Nevada.
No, we’re talking about lying to police officers.
On talking to police officers in a stop, might as well cite once more the classic, invaluable two-part video series.
Here’s Part II, as told by a LEO. Part I is from a lawyer.
Lies, and damn lies. Guess who gets damned.