# If Neoliberalism is dying, what will replace it?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704>\
**Category:** Great Debates\
**Created:** [February 19, 2014, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704 "2014-02-19T14:25:52Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Jumpin-Jack-Flash](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/j/c68b51/32.png) [@Jumpin-Jack-Flash](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Jumpin-Jack-Flash)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 2:25pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/1 "2014-02-19T14:25:52Z")

</div>

If we are now living through the last breaths of neoliberal economic theory in practice, what new system will replace it as the prevailing orthodoxy of capitalism?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 3:27pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/2 "2014-02-19T15:27:45Z")

</div>

Socialism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![QuickSilver](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/quicksilver/32/7832_2.png) [@QuickSilver](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/QuickSilver)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 3:30pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/3 "2014-02-19T15:30:39Z")

</div>

I was going to say socialism too, but I thought it too glib.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![silenus](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/silenus/32/166_2.png) [@silenus](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/silenus)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 3:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/4 "2014-02-19T15:38:28Z")

</div>

Socialism, most definitely.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lumpy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lumpy/32/446_2.png) [@Lumpy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lumpy)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 3:50pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/5 "2014-02-19T15:50:01Z")

</div>

> [@Jumpin-Jack-Flash](#):
>
> If we are now living through the last breaths of neoliberal economic theory in practice, what new system will replace it as the prevailing orthodoxy of capitalism?

If by neoliberal economic theory you mean the general system of “free market with some government controls, plus welfare”, then I’d say that the problem is three-fold:

First, the relative decline of the United States from its post-WW2 peak. We’re still spending like it’s 1965, even though Europe and the Pacific rim are now as much our economic rivals as they are our partners. The USA is suffering from severe “imperial overstretch” as Paul Kennedy termed it.

Second, the world economy is suffering from a shortage of cheap energy. Petroleum is slowly giving out and we don’t have an inexpensive alternative yet. High energy prices are stifling everything else.

Third, automation has increased to the point where there simply may not be any replacement jobs. Mechanization of farming was both caused by and resulted in agricultural labor becoming industrial labor. Increased industrial automation led to a movement from blue collar to white collar work. But now even white collar work is being impacted and it’s hard to see what might replace it. Not everyone can be a successful doctor, lawyer, stock trader or entertainer. Some have speculated that we might actually be in the nascent stages of a “post-scarcity” economy where human labor simply isn’t a vital factor anymore.

My guess is that “welfare” in one form or another will expand: raised minimum wages or tax-subsidized work, indefinitely extended unemployment insurance, etc.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sicks\_Ate](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Sicks\_Ate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sicks_Ate)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 3:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/6 "2014-02-19T15:55:10Z")

</div>

Hope this isn’t too much of a hijack, but let’s say that our Big Enemies in the Cold War weren’t Socialist, and our disagreement with them was over something unrelated to economic philosphy.

It’s pretty easy and common for people to demoize “socialism” because of our history with the USSR.

If not for that, would we already be well along in the process of slipping in to a comfortable form of socialism?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 3:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/7 "2014-02-19T15:59:09Z")

</div>

> [@Sicks\_Ate](#):
>
> Hope this isn’t too much of a hijack, but let’s say that our Big Enemies in the Cold War weren’t Socialist, and our disagreement with them was over something unrelated to economic philosphy.
> 
> It’s pretty easy and common for people to demoize “socialism” because of our history with the USSR.
> 
> If not for that, would we already be well along in the process of slipping in to a comfortable form of socialism?

Antisocialist feeling in America, even quite hysterical antisocialist feeling, long predated the Cold War. See the [First Red Scare](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_scare).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Sicks\_Ate](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/258eb7/32.png) [@Sicks\_Ate](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Sicks_Ate)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 4:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/8 "2014-02-19T16:31:52Z")

</div>

> [@BrainGlutton](#):
>
> Antisocialist feeling in America, even quite hysterical antisocialist feeling, long predated the Cold War. See the [First Red Scare](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_scare).

Ok, then let me edit the premise a bit…if socialism hadn’t previously been associated with left-wing radicalism, how likely is it that we’d have already adopted it today.

Or maybe this is just a stupid question…entirely possible considering how my day is going.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [February 19, 2014, 5:04pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/9 "2014-02-19T17:04:52Z")

</div>

> [@Sicks\_Ate](#):
>
> Ok, then let me edit the premise a bit…if socialism hadn’t previously been associated with left-wing radicalism, how likely is it that we’d have already adopted it today.
> 
> Or maybe this is just a stupid question…entirely possible considering how my day is going.

It was always LW radicalism by definition, but the radicals inspired more moderate social democrats/progressives, to whom we owe modern welfare states – or, in some cases, we owe welfare states to conservatives/reactionaries who were frightened of socialism and attempting to preempt some of its demands. That is why Bismarck created UHC in Germany. The same dynamic was probably in play in the New Deal, to some lesser extent; at any rate, FDR did crib several planks from the American Socialist Party’s platform, such as Social Security.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralfy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ralfy/32/600_2.png) [@ralfy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralfy)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 5:54am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/10 "2014-08-24T05:54:40Z")

</div>

In the long run, localization, especially given peak oil, credit crises, and environmental damage.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JKellyMap](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/jkellymap/32/15880_2.png) [@JKellyMap](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/JKellyMap)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 9:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/11 "2014-08-24T09:10:11Z")

</div>

> [@ralfy](#):
>
> In the long run, localization, especially given peak oil, credit crises, and environmental damage.

What do you mean by “localization”? The growth of the local _foods_ trend to the point where a significant portion if most people’s (Americans’? everyone’s?) food is grown within a certain geographic radius of oneself?  
That in itself would be a pretty radical shift. But perhaps by “localization” you mean even more than just about food. Or not. I’m genuinely curious!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralfy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ralfy/32/600_2.png) [@ralfy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralfy)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 1:56pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/12 "2014-08-24T13:56:36Z")

</div>

> [@JKellyMap](#):
>
> What do you mean by “localization”? The growth of the local _foods_ trend to the point where a significant portion if most people’s (Americans’? everyone’s?) food is grown within a certain geographic radius of oneself?  
> That in itself would be a pretty radical shift. But perhaps by “localization” you mean even more than just about food. Or not. I’m genuinely curious!

It’ll be more than just food, and it will take place in the long run due to the crises mentioned.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/q/f04885/32.png) [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Qin_Shi_Huangdi)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/13 "2014-08-24T15:48:37Z")

</div>

> [@ralfy](#):
>
> In the long run, localization, especially given peak oil, credit crises, and environmental damage.

Oh please, the last thing we need is anti-modernism of the leftist or the rightist variety.

Hopefully the New Deal liberalism/old-school social democracy that was unafraid of thinking big and strongly embraced modern science and the ideal of progress.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 3:48pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/14 "2014-08-24T15:48:53Z")

</div>

Where is this impression that neoliberalism is dying and needs replacing?

The distinction between neoliberalism and so-called socialist capitalism seems as fine as a hair on my chinny-chin-chin.

The current system isn’t going anywhere. We will continue with a moderately-regulated economy until the bifurcated have’s and have-not’s become too quarrelsome.

Where we go from there is anyone’s ominous speculation.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stringbean](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/d6d6ee/32.png) [@Stringbean](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Stringbean)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 3:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/15 "2014-08-24T15:51:12Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> Oh please, the last thing we need is anti-modernism of the leftist or the rightist variety.
> 
> Hopefully the New Deal liberalism/old-school social democracy that was unafraid of thinking big and strongly embraced modern science and the ideal of progress.

Curious that you equate modernism with increased centralization.

The old “bigger is better” mantra, despite poor performance of the glorious Progressive policies of yore.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Measure\_for\_Measure](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/measure_for_measure/32/557_2.png) [@Measure\_for\_Measure](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Measure_for_Measure)\
**Post date:** [August 24, 2014, 6:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/16 "2014-08-24T18:38:27Z")

</div>

I don’t accept the premise, but then again I don’t understand the premise because the terms have not been defined.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ralfy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/ralfy/32/600_2.png) [@ralfy](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ralfy)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2014, 2:25am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/17 "2014-08-25T02:25:31Z")

</div>

> [@Qin\_Shi\_Huangdi](#):
>
> Oh please, the last thing we need is anti-modernism of the leftist or the rightist variety.
> 
> Hopefully the New Deal liberalism/old-school social democracy that was unafraid of thinking big and strongly embraced modern science and the ideal of progress.

What I raised is not based on anti-modernism but the results of industrial capitalism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Human\_Action](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/h/ac91a4/32.png) [@Human\_Action](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Human_Action)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2014, 4:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/18 "2014-08-25T16:09:49Z")

</div>

> [@ralfy](#):
>
> It’ll be more than just food, and it will take place in the long run due to the crises mentioned.

Can you explain exactly what you mean by “localization”? Do you mean a reversal of globalization, wherein economic activity is confined to small areas instead of crossing national borders, or what?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BrainGlutton](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/82dd89/32.png) [@BrainGlutton](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BrainGlutton)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2014, 4:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/19 "2014-08-25T16:11:05Z")

</div>

> [@Stringbean](#):
>
> Curious that you equate modernism with increased centralization.
> 
> The old “bigger is better” mantra, despite poor performance of the glorious Progressive policies of yore.

😕 The only Progressive-Era policy I can recall that didn’t work was Prohibition.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lemur866](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/lemur866/32/434_2.png) [@Lemur866](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lemur866)\
**Post date:** [August 25, 2014, 6:02pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704/20 "2014-08-25T18:02:59Z")

</div>

His notion is that, due to increased energy costs–that is, Peak Oil–we won’t be able to ship goods across oceans and continents anymore, and so if you want an iPod you’ll have to make due with one built within a hundred miles of you.

Which is nonsense. The amount of energy it takes to run a container ship across the Pacific Ocean is a small fraction of the cost of an iPod. There will always be plenty of energy to run container ships, even if the energy costs are two or three or ten times greater than they are today.

For hundreds of years–more like thousands of years if we go back to the Roman Empire–goods were transported across the oceans. It was often cheaper to ship goods from one end of the Mediterranean to the other than it was to transport them overland a hundred kilometers. And so the Roman plebes were fed grain from Egypt. That sort of thing isn’t going to change just because the price of crude oil gets higher and higher. At some point wind powered transport becomes cost effective. Yes, a clipper ship filled with iPods from China seems anachronistic, but it makes much more sense than trying to make them in your backyard.

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-neoliberalism-is-dying-what-will-replace-it/681704.md?page=2)
