# If The Presidential Election Were Held Today, Who Would You Vote For?

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461>\
**Category:** In My Humble Opinion\
**Created:** [July 5, 2002, 6:48am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461 "2002-07-05T06:48:49Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 20\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Neurotik](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/91b2a8/32.png) [@Neurotik](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Neurotik)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 7:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/21 "2002-07-05T19:31:36Z")

</div>

Stockdale!!!

Best VP debate ever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ivylass](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/i/9de053/32.png) [@ivylass](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/ivylass)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 7:38pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/22 "2002-07-05T19:38:39Z")

</div>

Whoever the Libertarian Party candidate is.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![BF](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/b5ac83/32.png) [@BF](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/BF)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 7:59pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/23 "2002-07-05T19:59:37Z")

</div>

Definitely Bush again, especially if it’s against McCain/whoever.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Palo\_Verde](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/65b543/32.png) [@Palo\_Verde](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Palo_Verde)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 8:11pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/24 "2002-07-05T20:11:26Z")

</div>

John McCain in a heatbeat.

It doesn’t matter to me if he runs as a Dem, Rep, or Independent.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TeaElle](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/t/8491ac/32.png) [@TeaElle](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/TeaElle)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 8:40pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/25 "2002-07-05T20:40:42Z")

</div>

There isn’t a Dem alive who could garner my vote, particularly not Gore, Clinton, Bayh, or any of them.

I would vote Bush, again. If he somehow does not run, then my vote will go to just about any Republican candidate, save McCain. I’m vehemently opposed to a cadre of his notions (McCain-Feingold most especially) and I don’t particularly trust him. I’d especially love to see Powell or Rice elevated to the VP level in '04, but I’d welcome Chaney again, as well.

Pretty darn predictable.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Punoqllads](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/d2c977/32.png) [@Punoqllads](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Punoqllads)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 9:51pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/26 "2002-07-05T21:51:29Z")

</div>

Pat Paulson, dammit.

Yes, he’s dead. I don’t recall there being a specific prohibition against dead people serving as President, is there? Yes, yes, there are rules for the transfer of power to others for deaths _whilst in office_ but what if he’s already kacked before day one?

Although, it might make the swearing-in difficult…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Profane](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/e47774/32.png) [@Profane](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Profane)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 9:55pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/27 "2002-07-05T21:55:12Z")

</div>

Another “anyone except Bush” here. Ashcroft has GOT to go.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 11:09pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/28 "2002-07-05T23:09:35Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> FWLIW I’ll happily “dips me lid” and hail as “El Prez” any candidate that wins the support of 50% of eligible US voters.

So you didn’t recognize the legitimacy of the winners of the presidential elections of the last 32 years? Because the highest **total** voter turnout as a percentage of the eligible voting-age population for any of those elections has been 55.2%, in 1972. Even landslide election winners only end up with 30-33% of the eligible voter total. (Reagan, for example, received 58% of the votes cast in 1984, but only 53.1% of eligible voters voted. That’s 31.2% of eligible voters who voted for Reagan.) Sorry, but U.S. elections just don’t work that way.

And I find it hard to believe that the “anyone but Bush” crowd would vote for, say, Jesse Helms.

Me, I can’t think of anyone in the Senate or House who I would vote for for President right now. Especially after the spectacle of the Senate falling all over each other to cast a 99-0 resolution for state-recognized religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [July 5, 2002, 11:18pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/29 "2002-07-05T23:18:58Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> FWLIW I’ll happily “dips me lid” and hail as “El Prez” any candidate that wins the support of 50% of eligible US voters.

So you didn’t recognize the legitimacy of the winners of the presidential elections of the last 32 years? Because the highest **total** voter turnout as a percentage of the eligible voting-age population for any of those elections has been 55.2%, in 1972. Even landslide election winners only end up with 30-33% of the eligible voter total. (Reagan, for example, received 58% of the votes cast in 1984, but only 53.1% of eligible voters voted. That’s 31.2% of eligible voters who voted for Reagan.) Sorry, but U.S. elections just don’t work that way.

And I find it hard to believe that the “anyone but Bush” crowd would vote for, say, Jesse Helms.

Me, I can’t think of anyone in the Senate or House who I would vote for for President right now. Especially after the spectacle of the Senate falling all over each other to cast a 99-0 resolution for state-recognized religion.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Flymaster](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/f/c4cdca/32.png) [@Flymaster](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Flymaster)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 12:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/30 "2002-07-06T00:41:37Z")

</div>

Anyone that isn’t Bush, but ideally Gore. I suppose I’d have to give a thought to McCain if he were to go Democrat, too, but I doubt I’d vote for him.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![even\_sven](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/e/dfb087/32.png) [@even\_sven](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/even_sven)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 2:26am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/31 "2002-07-06T02:26:57Z")

</div>

I’d probably vote for Nader again. If Hilary ran I’d vote for her in a heartbeat. But that just isn’t going to happen. Besides all the individual opposition to Hilary that is out there, this backwards-ass nation is still not ready to elect a female head of state (why? If Pakistan can do it, why can’t we?) and no major party would risk their chance with a woman.

I cannot hide my seetheing hatred of Bush and his friends… Ashcroft is doing damage to some pretty fundamental liberties that is going to be really really hard to undo. Bush has dedicated all too much of his time flipping the middle finger at atheists. Now his administration foaming at the mouth at the chance to start a war in Iraq for no apparent reason. It makes me embarrased to be American.

I usually accuse the Dems of being almost as bad as the Republicans, but I guess now that I am seeing the amount of damage that Bush can wreak, I am beginning to change my mind. I’d give anything to have Clinton back at this point. But still, I’d have to go with Nader.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/b19c9b/32.png) [@Kat](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Kat)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:00am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/32 "2002-07-06T03:00:50Z")

</div>

Cecil Adams

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Big\_Kahuna\_Burger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e0b2c6/32.png) [@Big\_Kahuna\_Burger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Big_Kahuna_Burger)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:10am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/33 "2002-07-06T03:10:04Z")

</div>

Joe Lieberman, I’m praying he runs because a) he can win b) most of our views are similar and c) I’m good friends with his former CoS, so a White House internship would not be out of the question. So Lieberman in 2004! Wooo!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Diceman](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/22d042/32.png) [@Diceman](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Diceman)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:30am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/34 "2002-07-06T03:30:51Z")

</div>

Quick quiz, **pldennison:** who was the popular vote winner in 2000? I believe that that’s what **woolly** is talking about.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:31am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/35 "2002-07-06T03:31:57Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Besides all the individual opposition to Hilary that is out there, this backwards-ass nation is still not ready to elect a female head of state (why? If Pakistan can do it, why can’t we?) and no major party would risk their chance with a woman.

I’ll bet you $1,000 that if Condoleeza Rice were to run for President as a Republican, she would be nominated and she would win. What’s more, I question your assertion that we are “not ready” to elect a woman; it’s a bit hard to elect someone who has not run for the office in modern memory. When was the last time a woman launched a serious bid for the Presidency – the suffragette era?

> [@](#):
>
> Now his administration foaming at the mouth at the chance to start a war in Iraq for no apparent reason.

Except, you know, Saddam Hussein being a fargin’ nutbag and trying desperately to get his hands on or create weapons of mass destruction. Know this: The day Hussein gets his hands on a nuclear weapon, Tel Aviv will disappear in a cloud of smoke that afternoon. I, for one, would prefer for that not to happen. It’s entirely possible that a war is not the _best_ course of action, but allowing Hussein to continue his pursuit of such weapons is not even an option.

> [@](#):
>
> It makes me embarrased to be American.

Like you love America so much otherwise. :rolleyes:

Tell me, what would Ralph Nader have done on 9/12? Held hearings on why Boeing couldn’t make a safer aircraft?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![pldennison](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/9fc29f/32.png) [@pldennison](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/pldennison)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:34am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/36 "2002-07-06T03:34:19Z")

</div>

**Diceman** , if that’s what he meant, he’s free to clarify, but he specifically said “50% of eligible U.S. voters,” and recently in a GD thread he expressed over U.S. voter turnout _vis a vis_ Australian voter turnout.

No animosity implied, BTW; I’ve shared beers with woolly and he’s a good guy.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mandielise](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/58956e/32.png) [@mandielise](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/mandielise)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/37 "2002-07-06T03:36:50Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> \*Originally posted by even sven \*  
> \*\*I’d probably vote for Nader again. If Hilary ran I’d vote for her in a heartbeat. But that just isn’t going to happen. Besides all the individual opposition to Hilary that is out there, this backwards-ass nation is still not ready to elect a female head of state (why? If Pakistan can do it, why can’t we?) and no major party would risk their chance with a woman.  
> \*\*

I agree with you with the GEAUX NADAR mentality (I read up on him and saw him speak at my university and was extremely impressed). However, I want to get something straight: I wouldn’t vote for Hillary cause I hate her. I think she’s a horrible leader, she has crooked politics, and she would do a bad job. You don’t have to agree with me, but please understand that no one’s against her cause she’s a woman. If anything, more people would vote for her BECAUSE she’s a woman. Just like most African Americans vote for the democrats because they have some false hope in their system. Show me a woman who’s capable and I’ll vote for her!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Big\_Kahuna\_Burger](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/b/e0b2c6/32.png) [@Big\_Kahuna\_Burger](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Big_Kahuna_Burger)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:38am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/38 "2002-07-06T03:38:35Z")

</div>

> [@](#):
>
> Know this: The day Hussein gets his hands on a nuclear weapon, Tel Aviv will disappear in a cloud of smoke that afternoon.

I’d have to disagree with you on that one. First off, the Middle East is small geographically, and a nuke to Tel Aviv would cause problems for the West Bank and Jordan too, ostensibly full of people Iraqis wouldn’t want to harm. Second, it’s difficult to conceal a nuke, they generate a lot of heat and we can find them. If he comes close to making one it’s bombs over Baghdad, hopefully destroying the weapon before it’s functional. Rather, I’m more afraid of chemical/biological weapons, he already used them on the Kurds :eek:.

I like what you said about Nader though :).

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lorenzo](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/l/4da419/32.png) [@Lorenzo](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Lorenzo)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 3:41am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/39 "2002-07-06T03:41:36Z")

</div>

Gore, again.

Nice, good looking man surrounded by conservative experts should not be enough. How bad does the economy have to get before this guy’s popularity rating drops below his percentage of the popular vote? What if the DOW hits 5,000? Would that be enough? We’re two years into his administration and not much economic improvement yet. Perhaps it’s all Clinton’s fault.

“We are voting for president of the U.S., not prom king.”

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Nacho4Sara](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/n/3d9bf3/32.png) [@Nacho4Sara](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/Nacho4Sara)\
**Post date:** [July 6, 2002, 4:20am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461/40 "2002-07-06T04:20:21Z")

</div>

I voted for Gore in 2000 - I don’t think I could stomach voting for him again, so I’m hoping for some better candidates next time around.

Right now I’m keeping a close eye on John Edwards, Bob Kerrey, and John McCain. I freaking _adore_ McCain and I sincerely hopes he runs again - I’d vote for him even if he is a Republican (as long as he maintains his ‘00 stance on womens’ reproductive rights).

I’d have to be heavily drugged, brainwashed, tortured, and deprived food and water for the next year and a half before I’d even consider voting for George W. Bush, and you’d probably have to check the ballot with my cold, dead finger anyway.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461.md?page=1)

[Next page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-the-presidential-election-were-held-today-who-would-you-vote-for/117461.md?page=3)
