If Time Travel is possible

Since this requires speculation, let’s move it to IMHO.

Colibri
General Questions Moderator

I think I read the ‘cute idea’ in a Niven article first. However, you’re missing the point by saying “not discovered yet”. If time travel is possible and the past can be changed, that scenario is saying the only stable path for history/existence is one where it isn’t discovered. Any timeline where it is found will be changed until it isn’t discovered. And that would happen as many times as necessary, I guess.

It would be hilarious if it was discovered that time machines have been invented dozens of times and work exactly like in The Terminator, but nobody wanted to write a paper on how they turned up in the Victorian era buck naked.

No, the point is that there’s a timeline where time travel isn’t discovered at all. Are you arguing that in millions of different timelines, there isn’t even a single one where time travel isn’t discovered? It doesn’t matter how obvious it is - it’s possible that the idea got missed.

I don’t believe time travel to the past is possible at all, and it never will be. What’s happened has happened, and there’s no going back.

Now, I do believe we could send someone to the future. That would require a really fast space ship though, but at least it’s possible.

More like timey-wimey…wibbely-wobbely…stuff.

Or you can just take a nap, and in 5 minutes, a whole hour will have passed!

Alternatively: We’re ALL traveling into the future, and we’re doing it at a rate of 60 minutes per hour.

Begging for contact from Time Travelers never ends well.

[Steven Wright]I put instant coffee in a microwave and almost went back in time.[/SW]

If it’s possible into the future but not the past then that means it’s a one way trip.

Easily gotten around by postulating that the Many Worlds model of quantum mechanics is true; you travel back in time and kill your parents, and all you do is create a new universe where they and you no longer exist while your original past remains intact.

I’ve heard that used as an explanation for why we don’t see time travelers. Every time someone comes back they split off a new alternate universe; so if a million time travelers show up at an important historical event like the Crucifixion there’s not a mob of a million time travelers, there’s a million new universes with one time traveler each. Most of whom may well try to blend in, making it even harder to find evidence.

I thought this one was pretty good: caution for swearword and talking cartoon animals

Would all 1 million ppl try to blend in? I think if 20 ppl went back to then it would be difficult to make even all of them agree to blend in for many different reasons.

Reminded me of “Vintage Season”.

It would show up as a perfectly normal reply; once in the past, the time traveler would interact with the world just like any other person. In fact, before the person went back, he would be able to read the post his future self would have left in the past!

Source: personal experience (I read this post on January 28, 2014, just before I arrived today to post it)!

So in that case they’ll never receive a reply since the reply would already be there and the story would have said they got 1 reply.

The point is that if those 20 people or a million people went back, there would be at least a million separate new universes created, one for each (assuming they went back as individuals). It doesn’t matter if Time Traveler #4629 doesn’t blend in if he’s in another universe; you’ll never hear about him.

I might have done that too, but I won’t know for a while because I wasn’t here then yet.

Thank you. That makes sense.

Time travel is possible - in a single direction - to the future!