Portals.
Thank you for the instructive link.
Personally, I have more of a problem with ‘Under God’ than I do with ‘In God We Trust’. Forcing children to blindly utter a pledge to the symbol of our country is bad enough, but to insert the words ‘Under God’ includes a kind of religious coercion that I find to be stealthily dangerous. In comparison, most people pay little or no attention to the wording on their coins and bills as long as such are acceptable tinder.
It wasn’t a holiday anywhere until right about that time, so that’s some circular reasoning. Why would schools be out if it wasn’t a holiday?
Really? For sure not all of the 90% would get their panties twisted over removing it, but from my experience, the number would be way more than half of them.
I can’t imagine any Congresscritter who voted to do so getting re-elected.
Pretty much as an ignorant, kneejerk backlash against the godless, heathen communists of the 50s, and we’ve been too lazy to change it back.
1860s. You’re thinking of “under God” in the pledge.
[QUOTE=Der Trihs]
It was put on the money in the 1950s specifically as a way of saying “we’re Christians, not Commie atheists”. That’s a lot more recent, and something the majority of the population still takes very seriously.
[/QUOTE]
It was put on PAPER money in 1956 and formally adopted as the official motto in either '56 or '57 (don’t remember which), but it had been periodically on US coinage since the 1860’s and had been kicking around since at least 1812 IIRC. As with many things, it wasn’t formalized until late in the game, but it wasn’t like it was invented in the 50’s to differentiate us from ‘Commie atheists’.
Hilarious.
-XT
[QUOTE=BobLibDem]
Meh. 90% may believe in God, but I sincerely doubt a majority of them get their panties twisted over the idea of losing the motto on the currency.
[/QUOTE]
I doubt it too. However, considering the overwhelming numbers of people who believe in God in the US, even if only a fraction of them got worked up over taking it off the money you are still talking about significant numbers. While the numbers of folks who would get worked up about the words being on the money are taken mainly from a group that has an extremely small number of representatives. Small fraction of a large number of people=something that has political ramifications. Small fraction of a marginal group=yawn, politically speaking. All I was saying.
-XT
Not so much. Yeah, the pledge was also kneejerk, but:
McCarthyism was still going strong in 1956.
The notes in my pocket have a picture of Darwin and a hummingbird on them. Your argument here is as ridiculous as a fundamentalist claiming a tenner is an attack on their faith would be.
Hey, as long as it lights my cigar, I don’t care what they print on this $100 bill.
Same here…as long as somewhere on the bill I can find the word “Monopoly.”
Because God wants it that way. His design, His rules.
Considering the uses for the dollar, I’m surprised there aren’t more religious calls for the statement to be erased lest God’s wrath be invoked.
God works as graphical designer for the US treasury?
I know we can always count on your unique perspective on these matters, but do you actually think that the Creator of the Cosmos is concerned with such minutia as what words are currently stamped on the coins used in the USA?
Didn’t God say something along the lines of “hate thy labour as thy love thine wealth”?
No, no, no. It was hate thy neighbor as thy love thine MILF.
Quite honestly yes. I believe He is that involved in all aspects of creation to this level and much more.
The reason for the saying I believe is God just wants to have His say to the people, bypassing the government’s illusion of trust in government currency. In other words don’t trust this money in your pocket to get you home this evening, it is only because I allow it that you can get home safely. The message is there for those who can heed it.
It is also Him demonstrating His absolute authority over our nation, along with the famed ‘one nation under (the authority of) God’ which is how I take this line of the pledge.
It is also Him laughing at our government’s authority by ordering them to place His name above theirs.
It is amusing in many ways to me that these debates as to why things are, when the answer is because God has made it so and He does what He wants.