# If you think racism doesn't happen, you're wrong.

**URL:** <https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512>\
**Category:** The BBQ Pit\
**Created:** [December 17, 2014, 7:29pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512 "2014-12-17T19:29:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 14\
**Page:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2014, 6:36pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/101 "2014-12-22T18:36:06Z")

</div>

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> AFAICT you are correct. It appears _People_ magazine assumed she was giving it as an example of racism because President Obama was talking in that context.

Right and she’s getting a lot of heat for that and there is no evidence she meant it like that. It was likely a long interview, and The Prez brought up one story and later or before Michelle mentioned her cute little story. People magazine took it out of context- deliberately, since they pushed it\*\* HARD!\*\*

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2014, 7:06pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/102 "2014-12-22T19:06:02Z")

</div>

> [@DrDeth](#):
>
> The second time- People magazine took it out of context. There’s nothing in her words that indicate she thought there was anything racist going on.

> [@Shodan](#):
>
> AFAICT you are correct. It appears _People_ magazine assumed she was giving it as an example of racism because President Obama was talking in that context.
> 
> Regards,  
> Shodan

So why did she say this, at the end:

> [@](#):
>
> Those kinds of things happen in life. So it isn’t anything new.

The context was they were discussing the idea that people figure the Obamas are shielded from racism, living in the White House:

> [@](#):
>
> “I think people forget that we’ve lived in the White House for six years,” the first lady told PEOPLE, laughing wryly, along with her husband, at the assumption that the first family has been largely insulated from coming face-to-face with racism.

Emphasis added.

Note: Even this “source article” I linked to is clipped, since they want you to join to get the full article. Ain’t gonna happen for me…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DrDeth](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/b487fb/32.png) [@DrDeth](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/DrDeth)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2014, 7:33pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/103 "2014-12-22T19:33:35Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> So why did she say this, at the end:
> 
> The context was they were discussing the idea that people figure the Obamas are shielded from racism, living in the White House:  
> Emphasis added.
> 
> Note: Even this “source article” I linked to is clipped, since they want you to join to get the full article. Ain’t gonna happen for me…

I dont see that as the context that the Obamas started with. It’s the context that People magazine pushed in order to sell zines.

“Those kinds of things happen in life. So it isn’t anything new” could mean that tall people are asked to help short people or that Celebrities arent always recognized.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2014, 10:31pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/104 "2014-12-22T22:31:53Z")

</div>

I guess if you try as hard as you possible can, you can pretend that comment wasn’t about racism. “Those kinds of things happen in life” is what you say about things that are tragic, disappointing, or unfortunate. Being tall is none of those things. Nor is being a celebrity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 22, 2014, 11:52pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/105 "2014-12-22T23:52:10Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> I guess if you try as hard as you possible can, you can pretend that comment wasn’t about racism. “Those kinds of things happen in life” is what you say about things that are tragic, disappointing, or unfortunate. Being tall is none of those things. Nor is being a celebrity.

Considering the way she explained this exact incident before, and there’s nothing that references racism in the second use/quote, it doesn’t seem stretching it that much to assume that this original explanation is how she actually feels about it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 1:06am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/106 "2014-12-23T01:06:39Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Considering the way she explained this exact incident before, and there’s nothing that references racism in the second use/quote, it doesn’t seem stretching it that much to assume that this original explanation is how she actually feels about it.

Except for the fact that she change an important detail the 2nd time around as already noted. And everything else in that article is about racism.

Now, you can believe that the magazine wrote an article that was 100% about racism and then decided to plop something unrelated to racism right in the middle without any indication that the subject had changed. But I would submit that is the least parsimonious explanation, not the most.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 1:15am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/107 "2014-12-23T01:15:14Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Except for the fact that she change an important detail the 2nd time around as already noted. And everything else in that article is about racism.

Could you refresh my memory about this detail?

> [@](#):
>
> Now, you can believe that the magazine wrote an article that was 100% about racism and then decided to plop something unrelated to racism right in the middle without any indication that the subject had changed. But I would submit that is the least parsimonious explanation, not the most.

I don’t think it’s the least or most parsimonious explanation, but falls right into the middle of normal journalistic practices (especially in ‘soft’ journalism).

It’s just not surprising to me at all if a magazine takes a quote out of context and applies to a different subject in which it superficially appears to fit. It’s not a hit piece – but it sounds like it could be normal, day-to-day lazy journalism.

Or it could be the First Lady changing the motives she assumed for why she was asked to reach the high-up thing in the store. That’s very possible, but I don’t think that’s clearly a more likely explanation than lazy journalism. Perhaps I’m biased by my belief that Michelle Obama is a very intelligent and coherent thinker and speaker, but I think lazy journalism is more likely in this case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 1:39am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/108 "2014-12-23T01:39:59Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> Could you refresh my memory about this detail?

Originally, she said she was “under cover”. She emphasized the fact that she was trying not to be recognized. In the second story (what we are talking about now), she described herself as “not heavily disguised”-- that is, she deemphasized it. The first time around, it was told as a humorous story. The second time it was one of “Those kinds of things happen in life. So it isn’t anything new.”

> [@](#):
>
> I don’t think it’s the least or most parsimonious explanation, but falls right into the middle of normal journalistic practices (especially in ‘soft’ journalism).
> 
> It’s just not surprising to me at all if a magazine takes a quote out of context and applies to a different subject in which it superficially appears to fit. It’s not a hit piece – but it sounds like it could be normal, day-to-day lazy journalism.
> 
> Or it could be the First Lady changing the motives she assumed for why she was asked to reach the high-up thing in the store. That’s very possible, but I don’t think that’s clearly a more likely explanation than lazy journalism. Perhaps I’m biased by my belief that Michelle Obama is a very intelligent and coherent thinker and speaker, but I think lazy journalism is more likely in this case.

What evidence do you have, other than pure speculation, that the quote was taken out of context? Without any actual evidence, I’d don’t see any reason to suspect that to be the case.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 1:57am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/109 "2014-12-23T01:57:57Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Originally, she said she was “under cover”. She emphasized the fact that she was trying not to be recognized. In the second story (what we are talking about now), she described herself as “not heavily disguised”-- that is, she deemphasized it. The first time around, it was told as a humorous story. The second time it was one of “Those kinds of things happen in life. So it isn’t anything new.”

That’s not changing a detail, that’s just saying something in different ways, with different emphasis.

> [@](#):
>
> What evidence do you have, other than pure speculation, that the quote was taken out of context? Without any actual evidence, I’d don’t see any reason to suspect that to be the case.

Only that when she told the story before, the motivations she ascribes are not racist. The only evidence, of course, that the quote is actually in context (with respect to racism) is that it’s in a story about racism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 2:43am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/110 "2014-12-23T02:43:27Z")

</div>

> [@iiandyiiii](#):
>
> That’s not changing a detail, that’s just saying something in different ways, with different emphasis.

Did you read the original account? If not, then I suggest you do. The first story is all about how she was so concerned that her “cover” had been blown. She changed a detail-- the detail being how she dressed.

> [@](#):
>
> Only that when she told the story before, the motivations she ascribes are not racist. The only evidence, of course, that the quote is actually in context (with respect to racism) is that it’s in a story about racism.

The only evidence that it’s about racism is that it’s in a story where everything else is about racism? Well, I can’t imagine why you’d want any other evidence unless you simply don’t want to believe that she was recounting a story about racism.

And that’s not the only evidence. You’ve never addressed how her statement that “Those kinds of things happen in life. So it isn’t anything new” is best described as NOT about racism.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 2:59am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/111 "2014-12-23T02:59:24Z")

</div>

Just to be clear: your thesis is that she was just talking about having her cover as First Lady being blown. Is that something that just happens in this life; something that’s not new? Makes no sense in your version. Makes perfect sense as an anecdote about subtle racism, which is how her husband refers to that and other stories in his next quote.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 10:36am UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/112 "2014-12-23T10:36:59Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> Just to be clear: your thesis is that she was just talking about having her cover as First Lady being blown. Is that something that just happens in this life; something that’s not new? Makes no sense in your version. Makes perfect sense as an anecdote about subtle racism, which is how her husband refers to that and other stories in his next quote.

That’s not what her first story was about (we’re talking about the late night talk show bit, right? That’s the one I watched) – it was about how she was worried her cover was blown, but it turned out someone was just asking her to reach for something high – so her cover was not blown. And yes, that kind of thing does “just happen” in life all the time.

You might be right – I just see lazy journalism as equally or more likely than MO changing her story.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![John\_Mace](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/john_mace/32/185_2.png) [@John\_Mace](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/John_Mace)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 2:05pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/113 "2014-12-23T14:05:34Z")

</div>

We’re going to have to agree to disagree, especially if you think “those things happen in life. It’s nothing new” is more likely to apply to the First Lady NOT having her cover blown as opposed to MO experiencing subtle racism.

It should also be noted that ALL the mainstream media reporting this event (including Rueters, AP, WashPo) interpreted this the way I did, not the way you did. I have not seen one mainstream media making a claim that this quote was taken out of context. Perhaps you have…

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![iiandyiiii](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/straightdope/user_avatar/boards.straightdope.com/iiandyiiii/32/7924_2.png) [@iiandyiiii](https://boards.straightdope.com/u/iiandyiiii)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2014, 7:13pm UTC](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512/114 "2014-12-23T19:13:27Z")

</div>

> [@John\_Mace](#):
>
> We’re going to have to agree to disagree, especially if you think “those things happen in life. It’s nothing new” is more likely to apply to the First Lady NOT having her cover blown as opposed to MO experiencing subtle racism.

I thought the “those things happen…” was from the President, not MO.

> [@](#):
>
> It should also be noted that ALL the mainstream media reporting this event (including Rueters, AP, WashPo) interpreted this the way I did, not the way you did. I have not seen one mainstream media making a claim that this quote was taken out of context. Perhaps you have…

I haven’t looked at any media at all for this story other than what was linked here.

[Previous page](https://boards.straightdope.com/t/if-you-think-racism-doesnt-happen-youre-wrong/707512.md?page=5)
